Gu Yiyun, Wang Xiaojiao, Wu Jiangnan, Zhu Chunxiang, Min Hui, Zhang Jialu, Mao Liping, Sun Hangyun, Dai Yaming, Gu Chunyi
Department of Nursing, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China; School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China.
Department of Nursing, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China.
Midwifery. 2025 Jun;145:104380. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104380. Epub 2025 Mar 16.
Labour pain management remains a critical concern, as pharmacological methods often carry side effects and potential risks. Non-pharmacological approaches, such as acupoint stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) are being explored as viable alternatives. However, evidence regarding their combined use and overall effect on maternal and fetal outcomes remains limited.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of acupoint stimulation combined with TENS on labour pain, delivery outcomes, and childbirth experience for women undergoing a trial of labour.
A parallel multi-arm, stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted with 600 women randomized into four groups: TENS, acupoint stimulation, TENS combined with acupoint stimulation, and a control group. The study assessed Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Non-Pharmacological to Pharmacological Pain Management Interval (NPI), the rate of epidural analgesia, delivery outcomes, and childbirth experience.
After intervention, women's VAS scores in the TENS, acupoint stimulation, and combined groups were significantly lower than the control group at multiple time points (at 30 , 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, and 270 min, P < 0.05). Non-pharmacological to pharmacological pain management intervals (NPIs) were significantly longer in all intervention groups compared to the control group (P < 0.001), with median NPIs ranging from 178 to 183.5 min in the intervention groups versus 104 min in the control group. A positive correlation was observed between NPI and childbirth experience scores (r = 0.101, P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in epidural analgesia rates, delivery outcomes, postpartum bleeding, Apgar scores, labour duration, or perineal tear rates (all P > 0.05). Childbirth experience scores (CEQ) were significantly higher in the TENS and combined groups compared to the control group (P < 0.01).
Acupoint stimulation combined with TENS is an effective non-pharmacological approach for alleviating labour pain and enhancing the overall childbirth experience. This integrated method is recommended for incorporation into labour pain management protocols, providing women with a valuable alternative or adjunct to pharmacological interventions.
分娩疼痛管理仍然是一个关键问题,因为药物治疗方法往往会带来副作用和潜在风险。非药物方法,如穴位刺激和经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS),正在作为可行的替代方法进行探索。然而,关于它们联合使用及其对母婴结局的总体影响的证据仍然有限。
本研究旨在评估穴位刺激联合TENS对进行分娩试验的女性的分娩疼痛、分娩结局和分娩体验的有效性。
进行了一项平行多臂、阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验,将600名女性随机分为四组:TENS组、穴位刺激组、TENS联合穴位刺激组和对照组。该研究评估了视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、非药物到药物疼痛管理间隔时间(NPI)、硬膜外镇痛率、分娩结局和分娩体验。
干预后,TENS组、穴位刺激组和联合组女性在多个时间点(30、90、120、150、180、210、240和270分钟)的VAS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,所有干预组的非药物到药物疼痛管理间隔时间(NPIs)显著更长(P<0.001),干预组的NPIs中位数为178至183.5分钟,而对照组为104分钟。观察到NPI与分娩体验评分之间存在正相关(r = 0.101,P<0.05)。在硬膜外镇痛率、分娩结局、产后出血、阿普加评分、产程或会阴撕裂率方面未发现显著差异(所有P>0.05)。与对照组相比,TENS组和联合组的分娩体验评分(CEQ)显著更高(P<0.01)。
穴位刺激联合TENS是一种有效的非药物方法,可减轻分娩疼痛并增强总体分娩体验。建议将这种综合方法纳入分娩疼痛管理方案,为女性提供一种有价值的替代或辅助药物干预的方法。