Shafieioun Arezoo, Ghaffari Hossein, Baradaran Mansoureh, Rigi Amirhossein, Shahir Eftekhar Mohammad, Shojaeshafiei Farzaneh, Korani Mohammad Amir, Hatami Bahareh, Shirdel Shabnam, Ghanbari Kimia, Ghaderi Salar, Moharrami Yeganeh Pegah, Shahidi Ramin
Rasa Medical Imaging and Therapy Center, Isfahan, Iran.
Faculty of Medicine, Organ Transplant Super-Speciality Montaseriyeh Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Mar 25;48(1):318. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03475-4.
Malignant cerebral edema (MCE) is a severe complication of acute ischemic stroke, with high mortality rates. Early and accurate prediction of MCE is critical for initiating timely interventions such as decompressive hemicraniectomy. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics have emerged as promising tools for predicting MCE, offering the potential to transform reactive stroke management into proactive care. However, variability in methodologies and inconsistent reporting limits the widespread adoption of these technologies. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus identified studies reporting on the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of AI models in MCE prediction. Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analyses. Subgroup analyses explored the impact of study design, machine learning input type, and other key factors on diagnostic accuracy. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plot analyses. Data from ten studies encompassing 1,594 unique stroke patients were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AI models for predicting MCE were 81.1% (95% CI: 73.0-87.2%) and 92.6% (95% CI: 91.2-93.9%), respectively, with an AUC of 0.939. The diagnostic odds ratio was 43.73 (95% CI: 24.78-77.15), demonstrating excellent discriminative ability. Subgroup analyses revealed higher sensitivity and specificity in prospective studies (92.0% and 93.3%) compared to retrospective studies (76.1% and 91.4%). Radiomics-based models showed slightly higher sensitivity (84.2%) compared to non-radiomics models (80.4%), though both input types achieved comparable specificity. Interestingly, patients undergoing revascularization had a higher prevalence of MCE, likely due to their more severe initial presentations. Minimal heterogeneity was observed in specificity across studies, while publication bias was noted for sensitivity estimates. AI models show excellent diagnostic performance for predicting malignant cerebral edema (MCE), offering high sensitivity and specificity. Prospective studies, radiomics integration, and multi-center collaborations enhance their accuracy. However, external validation and standardized methodologies are needed to ensure broader clinical adoption and improve outcomes for stroke patients at risk of MCE. Clinical trial number Not applicable.
恶性脑水肿(MCE)是急性缺血性卒中的一种严重并发症,死亡率很高。早期准确预测MCE对于及时启动减压性颅骨切除术等干预措施至关重要。人工智能(AI)和放射组学已成为预测MCE的有前景的工具,有望将反应性卒中管理转变为主动性护理。然而,方法的可变性和报告的不一致限制了这些技术的广泛应用。对PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Scopus进行全面检索,确定了报告AI模型在MCE预测中的敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)的研究。使用随机效应荟萃分析对数据进行综合。亚组分析探讨了研究设计、机器学习输入类型和其他关键因素对诊断准确性的影响。使用Egger检验和漏斗图分析评估发表偏倚。分析纳入了来自10项研究的1594例独特卒中患者的数据。AI模型预测MCE的合并敏感性和特异性分别为81.1%(95%CI:73.0-87.2%)和92.6%(95%CI:91.2-93.9%),AUC为0.939。诊断比值比为43.73(95%CI:24.78-77.15),显示出出色的鉴别能力。亚组分析显示,前瞻性研究的敏感性和特异性(分别为92.0%和93.3%)高于回顾性研究(分别为76.1%和91.4%)。基于放射组学的模型的敏感性(84.2%)略高于非放射组学模型(80.4%),尽管两种输入类型的特异性相当。有趣的是,接受血管重建的患者MCE的患病率较高,可能是因为他们最初的表现更严重。各研究在特异性方面观察到的异质性最小,而在敏感性估计方面存在发表偏倚。AI模型在预测恶性脑水肿(MCE)方面显示出出色的诊断性能,具有高敏感性和特异性。前瞻性研究、放射组学整合和多中心合作提高了其准确性。然而,需要进行外部验证和标准化方法,以确保更广泛的临床应用,并改善有MCE风险的卒中患者的预后。临床试验编号:不适用。