Koruk Fatma, Kahraman Selma, Turan Zeliha, Nur Özgen Hatice, Beyazgül Burcu
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, Harran University Faculty of Health Sciences, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
Department of Public Health Nursing, Harran University Faculty of Health Sciences, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2025 Jul-Aug;70(4):610-623. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13742. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
Breastfeeding self-efficacy can be increased through effective interventions to improve breastfeeding rates and promote maternal and infant health. Improving breastfeeding self-efficacy in the prenatal period is important for successful breastfeeding and sustainable breastfeeding practices after birth. Although randomized controlled trials have shown that antenatal and postnatal interventions can boost breastfeeding self-efficacy, evidence is lacking on which interventions are most effective and on the key characteristics of such interventions. The purpose of this review was (1) to examine the effects of various antenatal interventions on breastfeeding self-efficacy and (2) to identify the most effective intervention.
In this meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials and experimental studies were searched using 5 search engines in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis protocols declaration guidelines. In total, 34 studies were identified, which included 4698 participants. A random effects model, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression analysis were used to pool the results.
During pregnancy, all types of interventions except model-based counseling provided without prior education and simulation methods have been effective in increasing breastfeeding self-efficacy (P <.05). Intervention type was the only intervention characteristic that showed statistically significant differences in effect size using the between-group heterogeneity statistic (Q, 13.888; P = .016). A meta-regression analysis found a significant effect of differences in intervention types across studies (heterogeneity: τ, 0.672; Q value = 662.100; df = 33; P < .001; I = 95.016%; test for overall effect: z, 7.020; P = .001), and this difference was found to be due to model-based education and counseling, which had the largest effect size in increasing breastfeeding self-efficacy. Intervention type explained 16% of the relationship between interventions to increase breastfeeding self-efficacy during pregnancy and breastfeeding self-efficacy (r = 0.16).
There is a relationship between the types of interventions for breastfeeding during pregnancy and breastfeeding self-efficacy. To increase breastfeeding self-efficacy during pregnancy, it is recommended that health care professionals primarily develop programs that include model-based education and counseling.
通过有效的干预措施可以提高母乳喂养自我效能,从而提高母乳喂养率并促进母婴健康。在孕期提高母乳喂养自我效能对于产后成功进行母乳喂养及维持母乳喂养习惯至关重要。尽管随机对照试验表明产前和产后干预可以提高母乳喂养自我效能,但缺乏关于哪些干预措施最有效以及这些干预措施的关键特征的证据。本综述的目的是:(1)研究各种产前干预措施对母乳喂养自我效能的影响;(2)确定最有效的干预措施。
在这项荟萃分析中,按照系统评价与荟萃分析优先报告项目声明指南,使用5个搜索引擎检索随机对照试验和实验研究。总共确定了34项研究,包括4698名参与者。采用随机效应模型、亚组分析和荟萃回归分析来汇总结果。
在孕期,除了未经事先教育提供的基于模型的咨询和模拟方法外,所有类型的干预措施均能有效提高母乳喂养自我效能(P<.05)。使用组间异质性统计量(Q,13.888;P=.016)时,干预类型是唯一在效应量上显示出统计学显著差异的干预特征。荟萃回归分析发现,各研究间干预类型的差异具有显著效应(异质性:τ,0.672;Q值=662.100;自由度=33;P<.001;I=95.016%;总体效应检验:z,7.020;P=.001),并且发现这种差异是由于基于模型的教育和咨询,其在提高母乳喂养自我效能方面的效应量最大。干预类型解释了孕期增加母乳喂养自我效能的干预措施与母乳喂养自我效能之间16%的关系(r=0.16)。
孕期母乳喂养干预措施的类型与母乳喂养自我效能之间存在关联。为了在孕期提高母乳喂养自我效能,建议医疗保健专业人员主要制定包括基于模型的教育和咨询的项目。