McNicol Emily Lynn, Osuagwu Bethel, Vučković Aleksandra
Centre for Rehabilitation, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Mar 10;19:1556325. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1556325. eCollection 2025.
The task-dependent frequency of common neural drive to muscles has important applications for motor rehabilitation therapies. While it is well established that muscle dynamics influence the synchronicity of neural drive, the modulation of this coherence between static and dynamic movements remains unclear. Transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation (TESCS) is believed to enhance spinal cord excitability, potentially improving brain-muscle communication; however, its effect on common neural drive to muscles has not yet been reported. This study aimed to investigate differences in intermuscular coherence (IMC) frequency between static and dynamic movement tasks and determine whether it is feasible to enhance it by TESCS. Participants performed static and dynamic hand grip tasks at different timepoints with respect to stimulation, set to 80% tolerable intensity. Surface EMG signals were recorded from the (FDS) and (EDC) muscles during each trial to determine beta- (15-30 Hz) and gamma- (30-48 Hz) band intermuscular coherence. The sum of IMC ( ) was significantly greater ( = 0.018, = 0.0183, = 0.0172, = 0.0206, = 0.0183, = 0.0172) in the gamma-band for the dynamic task compared to the static task at every timepoint (before TESCS, during TESCS and immediately, 5-min, 10-min, and 15-min after TESCS) which may reflect a mechanism of increased efficiency of corticospinal interactions and could have implications for the types of movements that should be performed while receiving TESCS. There was no immediate measurable effect of TESCS on at any timepoint in the beta-band ( = 0.25, = 0.31) or gamma-band ( = 0.52, = 0.73) for either the static or dynamic task respectively. This could be explained by corticospinal networks already working at maximum capacity in able-bodied individuals or that a longer duration of TESCS is required to elicit a measurable effect. While the intra-task difference in beta- and gamma-band between static and dynamic tasks was statistically significant ( = 0.0275, = 0.0275, = 0.0031) at timepoints after stimulation, we did not find direct evidence that TESCS influenced this beta-gamma interaction. Thus, further investigation is needed to establish any causal relationship.
依赖任务的肌肉共同神经驱动频率在运动康复治疗中具有重要应用。虽然肌肉动力学影响神经驱动的同步性这一点已得到充分证实,但静态和动态运动之间这种相关性的调节仍不清楚。经皮脊髓电刺激(TESCS)被认为可增强脊髓兴奋性,可能改善脑-肌肉通信;然而,其对肌肉共同神经驱动的影响尚未见报道。本研究旨在调查静态和动态运动任务之间肌间相干性(IMC)频率的差异,并确定通过TESCS增强IMC是否可行。参与者在相对于刺激的不同时间点执行静态和动态握力任务,刺激强度设定为80%的耐受强度。在每次试验期间,从(FDS)和(EDC)肌肉记录表面肌电图信号,以确定β(15 - 30Hz)和γ(30 - 48Hz)频段的肌间相干性。在每个时间点(TESCS前、TESCS期间以及TESCS后立即、5分钟、10分钟和15分钟),动态任务在γ频段的IMC总和()均显著大于静态任务(= 0.018,= 0.0183,= 0.0172,= 0.0206,= 0.0183,= 0.0172),这可能反映了皮质脊髓相互作用效率提高的一种机制,并且可能对接受TESCS时应执行的运动类型有影响。对于静态或动态任务,在β频段(= 0.25,= 0.31)或γ频段(= 0.52,= 0.73)的任何时间点,TESCS均未产生立即可测量的对的影响。这可能是由于皮质脊髓网络在健全个体中已经以最大能力工作,或者需要更长时间的TESCS才能产生可测量的效果。虽然在刺激后的时间点,静态和动态任务之间β和γ频段的任务内差异具有统计学意义(= 0.0275,= 0.0275,= 0.0031),但我们没有找到直接证据表明TESCS影响这种β - γ相互作用。因此,需要进一步研究以确定任何因果关系。