Kenney Martha O, Limkakeng Alexander T, Ochoa Timothy N, Mathias Joacy G, Knisely Mitchell R, Keefe Francis
Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 20;18:1465-1478. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S507983. eCollection 2025.
Vaso-occlusive events (VOEs) are the primary cause of acute pain in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD), where high-dose opioids are the current standard treatment. Ketamine, a non-opioid analgesic, holds potential for managing acute SCD due to its opioid-sparing properties. This study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to an inpatient clinical trial of ketamine infusion for treatment of acute SCD pain.
A mixed-methods design integrated quantitative survey data from 70 sickle cell and emergency medicine clinicians with qualitative insights from 10 patient focus group participants. Survey responses (n = 77 total, including seven registered nurses) were analyzed descriptively and via Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney -tests, while focus groups were thematically coded using themes from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Clinicians showed varied comfort levels with ketamine, with significant differences between sickle cell and emergency medicine clinicians. Barriers to future trials included the lack of standardized protocols (50.6%) and providers' attitudes regarding ketamine (32.5%). Patients cited trust in providers and potential health benefits as key facilitators but also expressed concerns about safety, confidentiality, and time commitment of trial participation.
Successful implementation of inpatient trials of pain interventions, such as ketamine infusions, requires a multidisciplinary approach, transparent communication about risks, strong clinical frameworks, and patient-centered trial designs. While study limitations, such as potential selection bias and low survey response rate, should be considered, these findings provide actionable insights to guide the design of future clinical trials and improve non-opioid pain management for SCD.
血管闭塞性事件(VOE)是镰状细胞病(SCD)患者急性疼痛的主要原因,目前高剂量阿片类药物是标准治疗方法。氯胺酮作为一种非阿片类镇痛药,因其节省阿片类药物的特性,在治疗急性SCD方面具有潜力。本研究旨在探讨进行氯胺酮输注治疗急性SCD疼痛的住院临床试验的障碍和促进因素。
采用混合方法设计,整合了70名镰状细胞病和急诊医学临床医生的定量调查数据以及10名患者焦点小组参与者的定性见解。对调查回复(共77份,包括7名注册护士)进行描述性分析,并通过Fisher精确检验和Mann-Whitney检验进行分析,而焦点小组则使用实施研究综合框架中的主题进行主题编码。
临床医生对氯胺酮的接受程度各不相同,镰状细胞病和急诊医学临床医生之间存在显著差异。未来试验的障碍包括缺乏标准化方案(50.6%)和提供者对氯胺酮的态度(32.5%)。患者认为对提供者的信任和潜在的健康益处是关键促进因素,但也表达了对安全性、保密性以及参与试验所需时间投入的担忧。
成功实施疼痛干预的住院试验,如氯胺酮输注,需要多学科方法、关于风险的透明沟通、强大的临床框架以及以患者为中心的试验设计。虽然应考虑研究的局限性,如潜在的选择偏倚和低调查回复率,但这些发现提供了可操作的见解,以指导未来临床试验的设计,并改善SCD的非阿片类疼痛管理。