• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生态系统服务的空间差异及其驱动因素:中国长江经济带三大城市群的比较分析。

Spatial differences of ecosystem services and their driving factors: A comparation analysis among three urban agglomerations in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt.

机构信息

School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430070, China.

School of Urban Design, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430070, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 10;725:138452. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138452. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138452
PMID:32302846
Abstract

Understanding the spatial distribution characteristics of ecosystem service value (ESV) and their underlying driving factors is critical for ecosystem service management. Using three national-level urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, Cheng-Yu (CY), Middle-Reach Yangtze River (MRYR), and Yangtze River Delta (YRD), as a case study, this paper quantifies the ESVs and the spatial distribution characteristics, analyzes the driving factors of ESVs using the stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence, and technology model (STIRPAT). The results specify that: (1) Over the study period 2009-2016, the total ESV of the three urban agglomerations decreases by 5498.70 million USD. The regulating, supporting, and cultural service decrease by 4607.60, 2648.01, and 1182.25 million USD, respectively, while the provisioning service increases by 2795.15 million USD. (2) ESV in MRYR undergoes the largest reduction of 4269.70 million USD, followed by CY and YRD with 1015.66 and 213.35 million USD from 2009 to 2016. (3) In 2016, among the 70 cities at the prefecture level or above, the cities with high total ESV, per unit area ESV, and per capita EVS are mainly distributed to the areas of the south Yangtze River of MRYR and YRD, MRYR, and MRYR and YRD, respectively. (4) In general, land use and cover, population are the main factors affecting ESVs, followed by economic, social and political factors. Among the three urban agglomerations, population, land use and cover basically have the equally important impacts on ESV in CY; land use and cover, especially the proportion of urban construction land has the greatest impact on ESV in MRYR; population, especially the urbanization rate has the greatest impact in YRD. The comparative analysis of the driving factors of ESVs in different regions is helpful to propose differentiated ecological protection policies and promote the increase of ESV accordingly.

摘要

理解生态系统服务价值(ESV)的空间分布特征及其潜在驱动因素对于生态系统服务管理至关重要。本研究以长江经济带的三个国家级城市群——成渝(CY)、长江中游(MRYR)和长江三角洲(YRD)为例,量化了 ESV 及其空间分布特征,利用随机影响回归人口、富裕和技术模型(STIRPAT)分析了 ESV 的驱动因素。结果表明:(1)在 2009-2016 年期间,三个城市群的总 ESV 减少了 5498.70 亿美元。调节、支持和文化服务分别减少了 4607.60、2648.01 和 1182.25 亿美元,而供给服务增加了 2795.15 亿美元。(2)MRYR 的 ESV 减少量最大,为 4269.70 亿美元,其次是 CY 和 YRD,分别减少了 1015.66 亿美元和 213.35 亿美元。(3)2016 年,在 70 个以上的地级市中,总 ESV、单位面积 ESV 和人均 ESV 较高的城市主要分布在 MRYR 和 YRD 的江南地区、MRYR 以及 MRYR 和 YRD。(4)总体而言,土地利用和覆盖、人口是影响 ESV 的主要因素,其次是经济、社会和政治因素。在三个城市群中,人口、土地利用和覆盖对 CY 的 ESV 基本具有同等重要的影响;土地利用和覆盖,特别是城市建设用地比例对 MRYR 的 ESV 影响最大;人口,特别是城市化率对 YRD 的 ESV 影响最大。对不同区域 ESV 驱动因素的比较分析有助于提出有区别的生态保护政策,从而提高 ESV。

相似文献

1
Spatial differences of ecosystem services and their driving factors: A comparation analysis among three urban agglomerations in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt.生态系统服务的空间差异及其驱动因素:中国长江经济带三大城市群的比较分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 10;725:138452. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138452. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
2
Does China's Yangtze River Economic Belt policy impact on local ecosystem services?中国的长江经济带政策对当地生态系统服务有影响吗?
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Aug 1;676:231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.135. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
3
Impact of Land Use/Cover Change on Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration Ecosystem Services Value: Temporal-Spatial Patterns and Cold/Hot Spots Ecosystem Services Value Change Brought by Urbanization.土地利用/覆被变化对长江三角洲城市群生态系统服务价值的影响:时空格局及城市化带来的冷/热点生态系统服务价值变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 4;16(1):123. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010123.
4
Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics and Driving Forces of PM2.5 in Three Urban Agglomerations of the Yangtze River Economic Belt.长江经济带三大城市群 PM2.5 的时空分布特征及驱动因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 24;18(5):2222. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052222.
5
Ecosystem Services and Their Driving Forces in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China.中国长江中游城市群的生态系统服务及其驱动因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 25;17(10):3717. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103717.
6
[Regional Difference and Spatial Convergence of Land Use Carbon Emissions in Three Urban Agglomerations of Yangtze River Economic Belt].长江经济带三大城市群土地利用碳排放的区域差异与空间收敛性
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Aug 8;45(8):4656-4669. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202309059.
7
Exploring the formulation of ecological management policies by quantifying interregional primary ecosystem service flows in Yangtze River Delta region, China.探讨通过量化中国长江三角洲地区跨区域主要生态系统服务流动来制定生态管理政策。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Apr 15;284:112042. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112042. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
8
What is the spatiotemporal relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services? A case from 110 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.城市化与生态系统服务之间的时空关系是什么?来自中国长江经济带 110 个城市的案例。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 1;321:115709. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115709. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
9
Coupling Coordination Relationship and Driving Mechanism between Urbanization and Ecosystem Service Value in Large Regions: A Case Study of Urban Agglomeration in Yellow River Basin, China.大区域城市化与生态系统服务价值的耦合协调关系及驱动机制——以黄河流域城市群为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;18(15):7836. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157836.
10
Efficient population size of urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from a financial perspective.从金融视角看长江经济带城市群的有效人口规模。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 27;19(9):e0311090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311090. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the synergistic evolution of land use transformation and ecosystem service value in the Anning River Basin.安宁河流域土地利用转型与生态系统服务价值协同演变研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 4;15(1):28430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12657-5.
2
Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Capacity Using the Integrated Ecosystem Services Index at Optimal Scale in Central Yunnan, China.基于综合生态系统服务指数的滇中地区生态系统服务能力最优尺度评估
Ecol Evol. 2025 Apr 11;15(4):e71222. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71222. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
The coupling relationship and driving mechanism between ecological environment and high-quality economic development in the Middle Yellow River Basin.
黄河中游流域生态环境与高质量经济发展的耦合关系及驱动机制
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 28;15(1):10688. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94462-8.
4
Exploring the driving mechanism path of ecosystem service relationships based on the social-ecological system framework.基于社会-生态系统框架探索生态系统服务关系的驱动机制路径。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 25;15(1):10216. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94352-z.
5
Dynamics of ecosystem services and nonlinear responses to increased anthropogenic pressure.生态系统服务的动态变化及对人为压力增加的非线性响应。
Ambio. 2024 Nov;53(11):1649-1663. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02042-3. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
6
Integrating Spatial Heterogeneity into an Analysis between Ecosystem Service Value and Its Driving Factors: A Case Study of Dalian, China.将空间异质性纳入生态系统服务价值及其驱动因素分析中:以中国大连为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17055. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417055.
7
Estimation of Ecosystem Services Value at a Basin Scale Based on Modified Equivalent Coefficient: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin (Henan Section), China.基于修正等效系数的流域尺度生态系统服务价值估算:以中国黄河流域(河南段)为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 11;19(24):16648. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416648.
8
Trade-Off Analyses of Multiple Ecosystem Services and Their Drivers in the Shandong Yellow River Basin.山东黄河流域多种生态系统服务权衡及其驱动因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15681. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315681.
9
Quantifying the Relationship between Land Use Intensity and Ecosystem Services' Value in the Hanjiang River Basin: A Case Study of the Hubei Section.量化汉江流域土地利用强度与生态系统服务价值之间的关系:以湖北段为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):10950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710950.
10
Ecosystem Service Values in the Dongting Lake Eco-Economic Zone and the Synergistic Impact of Its Driving Factors.洞庭湖生态经济区生态系统服务价值及其驱动因素的协同影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 7;19(5):3121. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053121.