Suppr超能文献

确定运动员中可靠且相关的力-时间指标——等长中大腿拉和反向移动跳的考量因素

Identifying Reliable and Relatable Force-Time Metrics in Athletes-Considerations for the Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull and Countermovement Jump.

作者信息

Merrigan Justin J, Stone Jason D, Hornsby W Guy, Hagen Joshua A

机构信息

Human Performance Innovation Center, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.

College of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.

出版信息

Sports (Basel). 2020 Dec 31;9(1):4. doi: 10.3390/sports9010004.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate intrasession reliability of countermovement jump (CMJ) and isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) force-time characteristics, as well as relationships between CMJ and IMTP metrics. Division I sport and club athletes ( = 112) completed two maximal effort CMJ and IMTP trials, in that order, on force plates. Relative and absolute reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) > 0.80 and coefficients of variation (CVs) < 10%. Intrasession reliability was acceptable for the majority of the CMJ force-time metrics except for concentric rate of force development (RFD), eccentric impulse and RFD, and lower limb stiffness. The IMTP's time to peak force, instantaneous force at 150 ms, instantaneous net force, and RFD measures were not reliable. Statistically significant weak to moderate relationships ( = 0.20-0.46) existed between allometrically scaled CMJ and IMTP metrics, with the exception of CMJ eccentric mean power not being related with IMTP performances. A majority of CMJ and IMTP metrics met acceptable reliability standards, except RFD measures which should be used with caution. Provided CMJs and IMTPs are indicative of distinct physical fitness capabilities, it is suggested to monitor athlete performance in both tests via changes in those variables that demonstrate the greatest degree of reliability.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估反向纵跳(CMJ)和等长中大腿拉(IMTP)力-时特征的组内可靠性,以及CMJ和IMTP指标之间的关系。一级体育和俱乐部运动员(n = 112)在测力台上按此顺序完成了两次最大努力的CMJ和IMTP测试。使用组内相关系数(ICC)> 0.80和变异系数(CV)< 10%来评估相对和绝对可靠性。除了向心力量发展速率(RFD)、离心冲量和RFD以及下肢刚度外,大多数CMJ力-时指标的组内可靠性是可接受的。IMTP的峰值力时间、150毫秒时的瞬时力、瞬时净力和RFD测量值不可靠。在按比例缩放的CMJ和IMTP指标之间存在统计学上显著的弱至中度关系(r = 0.20 - 0.46),但CMJ离心平均功率与IMTP表现无关。除了应谨慎使用的RFD测量值外,大多数CMJ和IMTP指标符合可接受的可靠性标准。假设CMJ和IMTP能够反映不同的身体素质能力,建议通过那些显示出最高可靠性程度的变量变化来监测运动员在这两项测试中的表现。

相似文献

8
Kinetic Predictors of Weightlifting Performance in Young Weightlifters.青少年举重运动员举重表现的动力学预测指标。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Sep 1;38(9):1551-1560. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004850. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Monitoring Neuromuscular Performance in Military Personnel.监测军事人员的神经肌肉表现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;17(23):9147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239147.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验