• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一家急症医院对库尔特S-Plus IV三分群血细胞分析仪的评估

Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential in an acute care hospital.

作者信息

Griswold D J, Champagne V D

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Jul;84(1):49-57. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.1.49.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/84.1.49
PMID:4014075
Abstract

An evaluation of the three-part white cell differential count on the Coulter S-Plus IV was carried out in a 500-bed acute care hospital. Automated counts were compared with manual differential counts over a seven-month period. The S-Plus IV categorizes cells by volume after treatment with diluent and lysing solution. The three categories are labeled lymphocyte, mononuclear, and granulocyte, and, in normal samples, these correspond with lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils. Eosinophils are counted either as mononuclear cells or granulocytes. Automated counts agree well with manual counts for the lymphocyte and granulocyte categories. Agreement is poor for the mononuclear category; this is likely due to the imprecision of the manual differential count. The S-Plus IV accurately classifies most samples as normal or abnormal. When all parameters of the hematology panel were evaluated, the false negative rate was less than 1%. Sixteen percent of results from the S-Plus IV were flagged, and 79% of these indicated an abnormality. False positive flags are usually due to a failure to adequately segregate mononuclear cells from granulocytes. Most commonly encountered abnormalities and hematologic disorders have abnormal three-part differential counts. The authors think the three-part differential cannot totally replace the manual differential but can decrease the number of repeat manual differentials on inpatients. It also offers quality control features useful to the hematology laboratory.

摘要

在一家拥有500张床位的急症医院对库尔特S-Plus IV型血细胞分析仪的三分群白细胞分类计数进行了评估。在七个月的时间里,将自动计数结果与手工分类计数结果进行了比较。S-Plus IV型血细胞分析仪在用稀释液和溶血剂处理后,根据细胞体积对细胞进行分类。这三个类别分别标记为淋巴细胞、单核细胞和粒细胞,在正常样本中,它们分别对应淋巴细胞、单核细胞和中性粒细胞。嗜酸性粒细胞要么被计为单核细胞,要么被计为粒细胞。自动计数结果与淋巴细胞和粒细胞类别的手工计数结果吻合良好。单核细胞类别的吻合度较差;这可能是由于手工分类计数的不精确性所致。S-Plus IV型血细胞分析仪能准确地将大多数样本分类为正常或异常。当对血液学检测项目的所有参数进行评估时,假阴性率低于1%。S-Plus IV型血细胞分析仪的结果中有16%被标记,其中79%表明存在异常。假阳性标记通常是由于未能充分将单核细胞与粒细胞区分开所致。最常见的异常情况和血液学疾病都有异常的三分群分类计数结果。作者认为三分群分类计数不能完全取代手工分类计数,但可以减少住院患者重复进行手工分类计数的次数。它还提供了对血液学实验室有用的质量控制功能。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential in an acute care hospital.在一家急症医院对库尔特S-Plus IV三分群血细胞分析仪的评估
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Jul;84(1):49-57. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.1.49.
2
Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential as a screening tool in a tertiary care hospital.评估库尔特S-Plus IV三分类法作为三级医院筛查工具的性能。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Jun;87(6):745-51. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/87.6.745.
3
Evaluation of an automated method for leukocyte differential counts based on electronic volume analysis.基于电子体积分析的白细胞分类计数自动化方法的评估
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1985 Jun;109(6):534-9.
4
Hematologic parameters and leukocyte histogram patterns in infectious mononucleosis.传染性单核细胞增多症的血液学参数及白细胞直方图模式
Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Apr;87(4):485-90. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/87.4.485.
5
An assessment of the three-population differential count on the Coulter Counter Model S Plus IV.对库尔特S Plus IV型血细胞分析仪上的三分类血细胞计数进行评估。
Clin Lab Haematol. 1986;8(4):347-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.1986.tb00123.x.
6
Evaluation of Coulter S-Plus three-part differential in population with a high prevalence of abnormalities.在异常高患病率人群中对库尔特S-Plus三分群血细胞分析仪进行评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Nov;84(5):620-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.5.620.
7
Differential white cell counting on the Coulter Counter Model S Plus IV (three population) and the Technicon H6000; a comparison by simple and multiple regression.
Clin Lab Haematol. 1985;7(4):335-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.1985.tb00048.x.
8
Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.自动化五分类白细胞计数。血液分析仪Sysmex SE - 9000、Sysmex NE - 8000和库尔特STKS软件生成的白细胞可疑标记的效率。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Jun;121(6):573-7.
9
Peripheral blood film review. The demise of the eyecount leukocyte differential.外周血涂片检查。白细胞分类计数的衰落。
Clin Lab Med. 2002 Mar;22(1):279-97. doi: 10.1016/s0272-2712(03)00075-1.
10
[Leukocyte differential of the Coulter VCS. Evaluation and modalities of use in comparison with the Coulter STKR and manual count].[库尔特VCS白细胞分类。与库尔特STKR及手工计数相比的评估及使用方式]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1990;48(4):247-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Reference value and annual trend of white blood cell counts among adult Japanese population.日本成年人白细胞计数的参考值和年度变化趋势。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2013 Mar;18(2):143-50. doi: 10.1007/s12199-012-0304-8. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
2
Coulter Plus IV leukocyte volume analysis instrument: sensitivity of blast identification in peripheral blood.库尔特Plus IV型白细胞体积分析仪:外周血中原始细胞识别的灵敏度
J Clin Pathol. 1988 Oct;41(10):1136-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.10.1136-b.
3
Eosinophils. Assays and interpretation.嗜酸性粒细胞。检测与解读。
Clin Rev Allergy. 1988 Summer;6(2):163-90.
4
Detection of important abnormalities of the differential count using the Coulter STKR blood counter.使用库尔特STKR血液计数器检测血细胞分类计数中的重要异常情况。
J Clin Pathol. 1989 Jul;42(7):772-6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.7.772.