• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估库尔特S-Plus IV三分类法作为三级医院筛查工具的性能。

Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential as a screening tool in a tertiary care hospital.

作者信息

Miers M K, Fogo A B, Federspiel C F, McAllister N W, Phillips P A, Cousar J B

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Jun;87(6):745-51. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/87.6.745.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/87.6.745
PMID:3591747
Abstract

The Coulter S-Plus IV separates leukocytes in peripheral blood by volume analysis into granulocytes, lymphocytes, and mononuclear cell fractions, the so-called three-part differential (3PD). White blood cell (WBC) counts, hemoglobin concentrations, platelet counts, 3PDs, and histograms were compared with smear differentials on 3,861 samples, including samples from oncology patients, to determine the predictive value of the Coulter parameters in detecting smear abnormalities. Results showed good correlation between the 3PD and smear differential for granulocytes and lymphocytes (correlation coefficients were 0.883 and 0.868, respectively) and poor correlation for mononuclear cells (0.492). No histogram region flag indicators were observed in the following samples: 15 of 40 samples with greater than or 1% blasts; 105 of 183 with greater than or 1 nucleated red blood cell (NRBC) per 100 WBCs; 65 of 113 with monocytosis greater than 1,600/microL (1.6 X 10(9)/L); 425 of 548 with greater than 2,000 bands/microL (2.0 X 10(9)/L); 84 of 112 with eosinophilia greater than 600/microL (0.6 X 10(9)L); and 88 of 149 with greater than 2% immature granulocytes. All samples with greater than 5% blasts were indicated by region flags and abnormal histograms. Oncology patient data were analyzed, yielding similar results. The authors established guidelines for using the Coulter 3PD data in their tertiary care laboratory to select samples that require smear evaluation.

摘要

库尔特S-Plus IV型血细胞分析仪通过体积分析将外周血中的白细胞分离为粒细胞、淋巴细胞和单核细胞组分,即所谓的三分群分类法(3PD)。对3861份样本(包括肿瘤患者的样本)的白细胞(WBC)计数、血红蛋白浓度、血小板计数、3PD结果和直方图与涂片分类结果进行比较,以确定库尔特参数在检测涂片异常方面的预测价值。结果显示,粒细胞和淋巴细胞的3PD结果与涂片分类结果之间具有良好的相关性(相关系数分别为0.883和0.868),而单核细胞的相关性较差(0.492)。在以下样本中未观察到直方图区域标记指标:40份有大于或等于1%原始细胞的样本中的15份;183份每100个WBC中有大于或等于1个有核红细胞(NRBC)的样本中的105份;113份单核细胞增多大于1600/μL(1.6×10⁹/L)的样本中的65份;548份杆状核细胞大于2000/μL(2.0×10⁹/L)的样本中的425份;112份嗜酸性粒细胞大于600/μL(0.6×10⁹/L)的样本中的84份;以及149份未成熟粒细胞大于2%的样本中的88份。所有原始细胞大于5%的样本均通过区域标记和异常直方图显示。对肿瘤患者的数据进行分析,得出了类似的结果。作者制定了在其三级医疗实验室中使用库尔特3PD数据来选择需要涂片评估的样本的指导原则。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential as a screening tool in a tertiary care hospital.评估库尔特S-Plus IV三分类法作为三级医院筛查工具的性能。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Jun;87(6):745-51. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/87.6.745.
2
Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential in an acute care hospital.在一家急症医院对库尔特S-Plus IV三分群血细胞分析仪的评估
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Jul;84(1):49-57. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.1.49.
3
Evaluation of the Coulter STKS five-part differential.库尔特STKS五分类法的评估
Am J Clin Pathol. 1993 Jan;99(1):72-81. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/99.1.72.
4
Evaluation of Coulter S-Plus three-part differential in population with a high prevalence of abnormalities.在异常高患病率人群中对库尔特S-Plus三分群血细胞分析仪进行评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Nov;84(5):620-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.5.620.
5
Evaluation of the Coulter three-part differential screen.库尔特三分群血细胞分析仪的评估
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Oct;84(4):481-4. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.4.481.
6
Evaluation of an automated method for leukocyte differential counts based on electronic volume analysis.基于电子体积分析的白细胞分类计数自动化方法的评估
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1985 Jun;109(6):534-9.
7
[Evaluation of the Coulter STKR differential histogram and the Coulter VCS formula analysis: a strategy of joint utilization].[库尔特STKR差异直方图与库尔特VCS公式分析的评估:联合应用策略]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1989 Sep;37(7):851-6.
8
[Leukocyte differential of the Coulter VCS. Evaluation and modalities of use in comparison with the Coulter STKR and manual count].[库尔特VCS白细胞分类。与库尔特STKR及手工计数相比的评估及使用方式]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1990;48(4):247-52.
9
An assessment of the three-population differential count on the Coulter Counter Model S Plus IV.对库尔特S Plus IV型血细胞分析仪上的三分类血细胞计数进行评估。
Clin Lab Haematol. 1986;8(4):347-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.1986.tb00123.x.
10
[Laboratory evaluation of the Sysmex NE-7000 flagging system; a tool for the recognition of abnormal cells in white cell differentials].[Sysmex NE-7000 标记系统的实验室评估;一种识别白细胞分类中异常细胞的工具]
Rinsho Byori. 1991 Jun;39(6):615-22.