• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在异常高患病率人群中对库尔特S-Plus三分群血细胞分析仪进行评估。

Evaluation of Coulter S-Plus three-part differential in population with a high prevalence of abnormalities.

作者信息

Cornbleet J, Kessinger S

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Nov;84(5):620-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.5.620.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/84.5.620
PMID:4061385
Abstract

The authors evaluated the Coulter S-Plus three-part differential and compared it with the total of component cells obtained by manual slide differential. The patient population (N = 989) was strikingly abnormal, in that 109 samples contained nucleated red blood cells, 118 samples contained one or more abnormal cells (blasts, promyelocytes, or lymphoma cells), and 95 samples had greater than 10% monocytes. The GRAN and LYMPH fractions were accurately measured in the specimens that did not display region (R) flags. The MONO fraction correlated poorly with the manual differential and underestimated monocytes when they were increased. Not all samples with small numbers of abnormal cells or nucleated red blood cells were flagged by the three-part differential. Specimens with eosinophilia and reactive lymphocytosis likewise did not always show R-flags. The following findings (prevalence = 23.9%) were arbitrarily defined to constitute an "abnormal" manual differential: nrbc greater than 0%, blasts greater than 0%, promyel greater than 0%, lymphoma cells greater than 0%, baso greater than 5%, myel greater than 5%, meta greater than 5%, eos greater than 10%, reactive lymphs greater than 10%. Sensitivity of R-flagging for these abnormalities was 81.7% and specificity 73.3%. The predictive value of an R-flagged ("positive") result was 48.3% and of an unflagged ("negative") result, 93.0%. Efficiency (accuracy) was calculated to be 75.5%.

摘要

作者评估了库尔特S-Plus三分群血细胞分析仪,并将其与手工涂片分类计数所得的各类细胞总数进行比较。患者群体(N = 989)异常情况显著,其中109份样本含有有核红细胞,118份样本含有一种或多种异常细胞(原始细胞、早幼粒细胞或淋巴瘤细胞),95份样本单核细胞比例大于10%。在未显示区域(R)标记的标本中,粒细胞(GRAN)和淋巴细胞(LYMPH)比例测量准确。单核细胞(MONO)比例与手工分类计数的相关性较差,且在单核细胞增多时会低估其数量。并非所有含有少量异常细胞或有核红细胞的样本都会被三分群血细胞分析仪标记。嗜酸性粒细胞增多和反应性淋巴细胞增多的标本同样并非总是显示R标记。以下发现(发生率 = 23.9%)被任意定义为构成“异常”手工分类计数:有核红细胞大于0%、原始细胞大于0%、早幼粒细胞大于0%、淋巴瘤细胞大于0%、嗜碱性粒细胞大于5%、中幼粒细胞大于5%、晚幼粒细胞大于5%、嗜酸性粒细胞大于10%、反应性淋巴细胞大于10%。这些异常情况的R标记敏感性为81.7%,特异性为73.3%。R标记(“阳性”)结果的预测值为48.3%,未标记(“阴性”)结果的预测值为93.0%。计算得出效率(准确性)为75.5%。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Coulter S-Plus three-part differential in population with a high prevalence of abnormalities.在异常高患病率人群中对库尔特S-Plus三分群血细胞分析仪进行评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Nov;84(5):620-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.5.620.
2
Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential as a screening tool in a tertiary care hospital.评估库尔特S-Plus IV三分类法作为三级医院筛查工具的性能。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Jun;87(6):745-51. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/87.6.745.
3
Evaluation of the Coulter STKS five-part differential.库尔特STKS五分类法的评估
Am J Clin Pathol. 1993 Jan;99(1):72-81. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/99.1.72.
4
Evaluation of the Coulter S-Plus IV three-part differential in an acute care hospital.在一家急症医院对库尔特S-Plus IV三分群血细胞分析仪的评估
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Jul;84(1):49-57. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.1.49.
5
Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.自动化五分类白细胞计数。血液分析仪Sysmex SE - 9000、Sysmex NE - 8000和库尔特STKS软件生成的白细胞可疑标记的效率。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Jun;121(6):573-7.
6
Evaluation of the CELL-DYN 3000 differential.CELL-DYN 3000血细胞分析仪的鉴别能力评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1992 Dec;98(6):603-14. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/98.6.603.
7
Evaluation and performance of the Coulter STKS.库尔特STKS的评估与性能
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1993 Mar;31(3):179-86.
8
Use of Coulter VCS for differential leukocyte counts.使用库尔特VCS进行白细胞分类计数。
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978). 1990;32(3):211-6.
9
Evaluation of an automated method for leukocyte differential counts based on electronic volume analysis.基于电子体积分析的白细胞分类计数自动化方法的评估
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1985 Jun;109(6):534-9.
10
Laboratory and clinical evaluation of white blood cell differential counts. Comparison of the Coulter VCS, Technicon H-1, and 800-cell manual method.白细胞分类计数的实验室及临床评估。库尔特VCS、Technicon H-1与800细胞手工计数法的比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1991 Mar;95(3):381-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/95.3.381.

引用本文的文献

1
Coulter Plus IV leukocyte volume analysis instrument: sensitivity of blast identification in peripheral blood.库尔特Plus IV型白细胞体积分析仪:外周血中原始细胞识别的灵敏度
J Clin Pathol. 1988 Oct;41(10):1136-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.41.10.1136-b.