培养人工智能伦理方面的生物伦理专业人员：一个框架
Training Bioethics Professionals in AI Ethics: A Framework.
作者信息
Aucouturier Etienne, Grinbaum Alexei
机构信息
CEA-Saclay, France.
出版信息
J Law Med Ethics. 2025 Mar 27;53(1):1-8. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.57.
Abstract
We present a training module in AI ethics designed to prepare a broad group of professionals to recognize and address potential ethical challenges of AI applications in healthcare. Training materials include a two-page checklist, a brief glossary, and three practical case studies. While we have developed and applied this framework for training Research Ethics Committee members in France and South Africa, it can also be helpful in university courses ranging from public health and healthcare law to biomedical engineering and applied ethics.
摘要
我们展示了一个人工智能伦理培训模块，旨在让广大专业人士做好准备，以识别和应对人工智能在医疗保健领域应用中潜在的伦理挑战。培训材料包括一份两页的清单、一个简短的术语表和三个实际案例研究。虽然我们已经开发并应用了这个框架来培训法国和南非的研究伦理委员会成员，但它在从公共卫生、医疗保健法到生物医学工程和应用伦理等大学课程中也会有所帮助。
相似文献
1
Training Bioethics Professionals in AI Ethics: A Framework.培养人工智能伦理方面的生物伦理专业人员：一个框架
J Law Med Ethics. 2025 Mar 27;53(1):1-8. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.57.
2
"We're all in it together": uniting a diverse range of professionals and people with lived experience within the development of a complex, theory-based paediatric speech and language therapy intervention.“我们同舟共济”：在一项基于理论的复杂儿科言语和语言治疗干预措施的开发过程中，团结各类专业人员以及有实际经验的人士。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 19;11(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00738-8.
3
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果：面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
4
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”：成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Redefining Mentorship in Medical Education with Artificial Intelligence: A Delphi Study on the Feasibility and Implications.利用人工智能重新定义医学教育中的导师指导：关于可行性和影响的德尔菲研究
Teach Learn Med. 2025 Jun 18:1-11. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2025.2521001.
6
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
The ethical dimensions of utilizing Artificial Intelligence in palliative care.在姑息治疗中使用人工智能的伦理维度。
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Jun;32(4):1285-1296. doi: 10.1177/09697330241296874. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
8
Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Future of Medical AI: Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Expert Workshop.信任、可信度与医学人工智能的未来：跨学科专家研讨会成果
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 2;27:e71236. doi: 10.2196/71236.
9
Safety and User Experience of a Generative Artificial Intelligence Digital Mental Health Intervention: Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.生成式人工智能数字心理健康干预的安全性与用户体验：探索性随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 23;27:e67365. doi: 10.2196/67365.
10
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法：定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
本文引用的文献
1
Embedded ethics: a proposal for integrating ethics into the development of medical AI.嵌入式伦理：将伦理融入医疗 AI 开发的建议。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 26;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00746-3.
2
Ethics and society review: Ethics reflection as a precondition to research funding.伦理与社会评论：伦理反思是研究资助的前提。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 28;118(52). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117261118.
3
Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?大数据研究的伦理审查：哪些应保留，哪些应改革？
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 30;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00616-4.
4
Governing AI-Driven Health Research: Are IRBs Up to the Task?人工智能驱动的健康研究治理：伦理审查委员会能胜任这项任务吗？
Ethics Hum Res. 2021 Mar;43(2):35-42. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500085.
5
How to tackle the conundrum of quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature/information? Analysing the problems of three possible strategies (translation of a German paper).如何解决规范性文献/信息系统评价中的质量评估难题？分析三种可能策略（一篇德文论文的翻译）的问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Nov 14;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0423-5.
6
Beyond Research Ethics: Dialogues in Neuro-ICT Research.超越研究伦理：神经信息通信技术研究中的对话
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Mar 29;13:105. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00105. eCollection 2019.
7
Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences.伦理培训项目是否在改进？对科学领域过去和现在的伦理教学的元分析综述。
Ethics Behav. 2017;27(5):351-384. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2016.1182025. Epub 2016 May 27.
8
Education of ethics committee members: experiences from Croatia.伦理委员会成员的培训：来自克罗地亚的经验
J Med Ethics. 2006 Mar;32(3):138-42. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.011643.
Zotero 插件