Borovecki A, ten Have H, Oresković S
Andrija Stampar School of Public Health, Medical School, University of Zagreb, Rockefellerova 4, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.
J Med Ethics. 2006 Mar;32(3):138-42. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.011643.
To study knowledge and attitudes of hospital ethics committee members at the first workshop for ethics committees in Croatia.
Before/after cross-sectional study using a self administered questionnaire.
Educational workshop for members of hospital ethics committees, Zagreb, 2003.
Knowledge and attitudes of participants before and after the workshop; everyday functioning of hospital ethics committees.
The majority of the respondents came from committees with at least five members. The majority of ethics committees were appointed by the governing bodies of their hospitals. Most committees were founded after the implementation of the law on health protection in 1997. Membership structure (three physicians and two members from other fields) and functions were established on the basis of that law. Analysis of research protocols was the main part of their work. Other important functions-education, case analysis, guidelines formation-were neglected. Members' level of knowledge was not sufficient for the complicated tasks they were supposed to perform. However, it was significantly higher after the workshop. Most respondents felt their knowledge should be improved by additional education. Their views on certain issues and bioethical dilemmas displayed a high level of paternalism and over protectiveness, which did not change after the workshop.
The committees developed according to bureaucratic requirements. Furthermore, there are concerns about members' knowledge levels. More efforts need to be made to use education to improve the quality of the work. Additional research is necessary to explore ethics committees' work in Croatia especially in the hospital setting.
研究克罗地亚首届伦理委员会研讨会上医院伦理委员会成员的知识水平和态度。
采用自行填写问卷的前后横断面研究。
2003年于萨格勒布为医院伦理委员会成员举办的教育研讨会。
研讨会前后参与者的知识水平和态度;医院伦理委员会的日常运作。
大多数受访者来自成员至少有五人的委员会。大多数伦理委员会由其医院的管理机构任命。大多数委员会是在1997年《健康保护法》实施后成立的。成员结构(三名医生和两名其他领域成员)和职能是根据该法律确定的。对研究方案的分析是其工作的主要部分。其他重要职能——教育、案例分析、指南制定——被忽视了。成员的知识水平不足以胜任他们应执行的复杂任务。然而,研讨会后这一水平有了显著提高。大多数受访者认为应通过继续教育来提高他们的知识水平。他们对某些问题和生物伦理困境的看法表现出高度的家长作风和过度保护倾向,研讨会后这一点并未改变。
这些委员会是按照官僚要求发展起来的。此外,人们对成员的知识水平也有所担忧。需要做出更多努力利用教育来提高工作质量。有必要进行更多研究以探索克罗地亚伦理委员会的工作,尤其是在医院环境中的工作。