Cao Chen, Yu Guilan, Chen Liwei, Qin Jun, Lin Zhongyong
School of Business and Management, Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.
Department of Food, Chongqing Institute for Food and Drug Control, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Mar 21;18:719-731. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S508588. eCollection 2025.
Network modeling has been suggested as an effective approach to uncover intricate relationships among emotional states and their underlying symptoms. This study aimed to explore the dynamic interactions between subjective well-being (SWB) and depressive symptoms over time, using cross-sectional and cross-lagged network analysis.
Data were drawn from three waves (2016, 2018, and 2020) of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), including 13,409 participants aged 16 and above. SWB was measured through indicators like life satisfaction and future confidence, while depressive symptoms were assessed using the CES-D8 scale. Symptom-level interactions were analyzed via cross-sectional network analysis at each wave, and cross-lagged panel network analysis was employed to examine the temporal dynamics and bidirectional relationships between SWB and depressive symptoms.
The cross-sectional symptom network analysis showed that the number of non-zero edges at T1, T2, and T3 were 50, 44, and 49, respectively, with network densities of 0.90, 0.80, and 0.89. The core symptom "feeling sad" (D7) consistently had a significantly higher strength than other symptoms. The negative correlation between "life satisfaction" (Z2) and depressive symptoms was particularly evident at T3. The cross-lagged symptom network analysis revealed the key roles of "feeling lonely" (D5) and "feeling sad" (D7), as well as "feeling unhappy" (D4) and "not enjoying life" (D6) across different time periods, which may form a negative feedback loop. "Life satisfaction" (Z2) and "confidence in the future" (Z3) exhibited significant protective effects, forming a positive feedback loop that suppresses negative emotions through mutual reinforcement. Stability analysis showed that the network structure was stable, with a centrality stability coefficient of 0.75.
The study reveals a dynamic, bidirectional relationship between SWB and depressive symptoms. These results offer valuable insights for targeted interventions and public health initiatives aimed at improving mental well-being.
网络建模已被视为一种揭示情绪状态及其潜在症状之间复杂关系的有效方法。本研究旨在通过横断面和交叉滞后网络分析,探讨主观幸福感(SWB)与抑郁症状随时间的动态相互作用。
数据来自中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)的三个调查波次(2016年、2018年和2020年),包括13409名16岁及以上的参与者。主观幸福感通过生活满意度和未来信心等指标来衡量,而抑郁症状则使用CES-D8量表进行评估。在每个调查波次通过横断面网络分析来分析症状水平的相互作用,并采用交叉滞后面板网络分析来检验主观幸福感与抑郁症状之间的时间动态和双向关系。
横断面症状网络分析表明,T1、T2和T3时的非零边数量分别为50、44和49,网络密度分别为0.90、0.80和0.89。核心症状“感到悲伤”(D7)的强度始终显著高于其他症状。“生活满意度”(Z2)与抑郁症状之间的负相关在T3时尤为明显。交叉滞后症状网络分析揭示了“感到孤独”(D5)和“感到悲伤”(D7)以及“感到不开心”(D4)和“不享受生活”(D6)在不同时间段的关键作用,它们可能形成一个负反馈回路。“生活满意度”(Z2)和“对未来的信心”(Z3)表现出显著的保护作用,形成一个通过相互强化来抑制负面情绪的正反馈回路。稳定性分析表明网络结构稳定,中心性稳定性系数为0.75。
该研究揭示了主观幸福感与抑郁症状之间动态、双向的关系。这些结果为旨在改善心理健康的针对性干预措施和公共卫生倡议提供了有价值的见解。