Suppr超能文献

在植入左心室辅助装置前主动脉内球囊泵的术前使用。

Preoperative use of intra-aortic balloon pump before left ventricular assist device implantation.

作者信息

Sharaf Omar M, Liu Hua, Falasa Matheus, Brinkley Lindsey, Bilgili Ahmet, Neal Dan, Al-Ani Mohammad, Aranda Juan, Parker Alex, Ahmed Mustafa M, Vilaro Juan, Demos Daniel, Arnaoutakis George, Martin Tomas, Beaver Thomas M, Jeng Eric I

机构信息

University of Florida Health, Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Gainesville, Florida.

University of Florida Health, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.

出版信息

JHLT Open. 2025 Jan 30;8:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100222. eCollection 2025 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) have been employed to stabilize patients with acute-on-chronic cardiogenic shock. The use of IABP to optimize patients for successful left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has not been well-studied.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort of adults (>18 years) undergoing durable LVAD implantation between April 2011 and June 2019. One-to-one propensity matching paired patients requiring preoperative IABP placement with those who did not. The primary outcome assessed was 1-year mortality, with secondary outcomes, including hospital and intensive care unit (ICU), length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation, and complications. Further analysis examined postoperative changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), cardiac index (CI), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP).

RESULTS

Among 189 patients, preoperative IABP was used in 53 patients (28.0%). Of these, 32 patients were matched to 32 patients not requiring preoperative IABP placement. One-year mortality was not significantly different between IABP and non-IABP groups (17.0 vs 12.5%,  = 0.422). After matching, there were no significant differences in hospital LOS, ICU LOS, hours of postoperative mechanical ventilation, or complications including stroke, requirement for new renal replacement therapy, right heart failure, hemorrhagic complication, or infection requiring antibiotics. From the time of admission to within 24 hours prior to LVAD implantation, patients supported with IABP had greater reductions in systolic PAP and PCWP, and larger increases in CI.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, patients requiring IABP support for stabilization undergoing durable LVAD implant had similar 1-year survival to those not requiring IABP support. Patients supported on IABP had larger reductions in PCWP and sPAP with greater increases in CI prior to LVAD implant.

摘要

背景

主动脉内球囊反搏泵(IABP)已被用于稳定慢性心力衰竭急性失代偿患者。IABP用于优化患者以成功植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的研究尚不充分。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了2011年4月至2019年6月期间接受长期LVAD植入的18岁以上成年人。采用一对一倾向匹配法,将术前需要放置IABP的患者与不需要放置IABP的患者进行配对。评估的主要结局是1年死亡率,次要结局包括住院时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、机械通气时间和并发症。进一步分析术后收缩期肺动脉压(PAP)、心脏指数(CI)和肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)的变化。

结果

189例患者中,53例(28.0%)术前使用了IABP。其中,32例患者与32例术前不需要放置IABP的患者进行了匹配。IABP组和非IABP组的1年死亡率无显著差异(17.0%对12.5%,P = 0.422)。匹配后,两组在住院时间、ICU住院时间、术后机械通气时间或并发症(包括中风、新的肾脏替代治疗需求、右心衰竭、出血并发症或需要抗生素治疗的感染)方面无显著差异。从入院到LVAD植入前24小时,接受IABP支持的患者收缩期PAP和PCWP下降幅度更大,CI升高幅度更大。

结论

在我们的研究中,需要IABP支持以稳定病情并接受长期LVAD植入的患者与不需要IABP支持的患者1年生存率相似。在LVAD植入前,接受IABP支持的患者PCWP和sPAP下降幅度更大,CI升高幅度更大。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验