• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Preoperative use of intra-aortic balloon pump before left ventricular assist device implantation.在植入左心室辅助装置前主动脉内球囊泵的术前使用。
JHLT Open. 2025 Jan 30;8:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100222. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Response and Predictors of Stabilization.慢性心力衰竭和心源性休克患者的主动脉内球囊反搏:临床反应及稳定的预测因素
J Card Fail. 2015 Nov;21(11):868-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.06.383. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
3
Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.血管内微型轴流左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者中的应用与院内死亡率和大出血的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 25;323(8):734-745. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0254.
4
Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Insights From the INTERMACS Registry.主动脉内球囊泵在左心室辅助装置植入前的应用:来自 INTERMACS 注册研究的见解。
ASAIO J. 2018 Mar/Apr;64(2):218-224. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000629.
5
Long-Term Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Support as Bridge to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.长期主动脉内球囊泵支持作为左心室辅助装置植入的桥梁
J Card Surg. 2016 Jul;31(7):467-71. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12759. Epub 2016 May 15.
6
Outcomes of Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients Managed With an Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.主动脉内球囊反搏泵在左心室辅助装置植入前对门诊心力衰竭患者的治疗结果。
ASAIO J. 2021 Apr 1;67(4):430-435. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001249.
7
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.经皮左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊反搏治疗心原性休克的对比:对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2009 Sep;30(17):2102-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp292. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
8
Efficacy of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in chronic heart failure patients undergoing cardiac surgery.预防性主动脉内球囊反搏治疗在接受心脏手术的慢性心力衰竭患者中的疗效
Artif Organs. 2014 Nov;38(11):967-72. doi: 10.1111/aor.12276. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
9
Clinical Outcomes and Cost Associated With an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Presenting With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.临床结局和成本与血管内微轴左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊泵在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Sep 1;182(9):926-933. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2735.
10
Percutaneous Left Axillary Artery Placement of Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Advanced Heart Failure Patients.经皮左腋动脉内置入主动脉内球囊反搏泵治疗晚期心力衰竭患者。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;8(4):313-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.01.011.

本文引用的文献

1
Hemodynamic reserve predicts early right heart failure after LVAD implantation.血流动力学储备预测左心室辅助装置植入后早期右心衰竭。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Dec;41(12):1716-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
2
Outcomes of Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients Managed With an Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.主动脉内球囊反搏泵在左心室辅助装置植入前对门诊心力衰竭患者的治疗结果。
ASAIO J. 2021 Apr 1;67(4):430-435. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001249.
3
Altered Hemodynamics and End-Organ Damage in Heart Failure: Impact on the Lung and Kidney.心力衰竭中的血液动力学改变和靶器官损伤:对肺和肾的影响。
Circulation. 2020 Sep 8;142(10):998-1012. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045409.
4
Right heart failure before LVAD implantation predicts right heart failure after LVAD implantation - is it that easy?左心室辅助装置植入前的右心衰竭可预测植入后的右心衰竭——有那么简单吗?
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 May 25;15(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01150-x.
5
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2019 Annual Report: The Changing Landscape of Devices and Indications.胸外科医生协会 Intermacs 2019 年度报告:设备和适应证的变化格局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar;109(3):649-660. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.005.
6
Short- and long-term adverse events in patients on temporary circulatory support before durable ventricular assist device: An IMACS registry analysis.临时循环支持患者在植入永久性心室辅助装置前的短期和长期不良事件:IMACS 注册分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Apr;39(4):342-352. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
Longitudinal impact of temporary mechanical circulatory support on durable ventricular assist device outcomes: An IMACS registry propensity matched analysis.临时机械循环支持对持久心室辅助装置结局的纵向影响:一项国际机械辅助循环学会(IMACS)注册研究的倾向匹配分析
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Feb;39(2):145-156. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
8
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database Annual Report: Evolving Indications, Outcomes, and Scientific Partnerships.《胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 数据库年度报告:不断变化的适应证、结果和科学合作》。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Feb;107(2):341-353. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.011.
9
Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Insights From the INTERMACS Registry.主动脉内球囊泵在左心室辅助装置植入前的应用:来自 INTERMACS 注册研究的见解。
ASAIO J. 2018 Mar/Apr;64(2):218-224. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000629.
10
Frequency and Consequences of Right-Sided Heart Failure After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.连续流左心室辅助装置植入术后右心衰竭的发生率及后果
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Feb 1;121(3):336-342. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

在植入左心室辅助装置前主动脉内球囊泵的术前使用。

Preoperative use of intra-aortic balloon pump before left ventricular assist device implantation.

作者信息

Sharaf Omar M, Liu Hua, Falasa Matheus, Brinkley Lindsey, Bilgili Ahmet, Neal Dan, Al-Ani Mohammad, Aranda Juan, Parker Alex, Ahmed Mustafa M, Vilaro Juan, Demos Daniel, Arnaoutakis George, Martin Tomas, Beaver Thomas M, Jeng Eric I

机构信息

University of Florida Health, Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Gainesville, Florida.

University of Florida Health, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.

出版信息

JHLT Open. 2025 Jan 30;8:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100222. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100222
PMID:40144729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11935405/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs) have been employed to stabilize patients with acute-on-chronic cardiogenic shock. The use of IABP to optimize patients for successful left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has not been well-studied.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort of adults (>18 years) undergoing durable LVAD implantation between April 2011 and June 2019. One-to-one propensity matching paired patients requiring preoperative IABP placement with those who did not. The primary outcome assessed was 1-year mortality, with secondary outcomes, including hospital and intensive care unit (ICU), length of stay (LOS), duration of mechanical ventilation, and complications. Further analysis examined postoperative changes in systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), cardiac index (CI), and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP).

RESULTS

Among 189 patients, preoperative IABP was used in 53 patients (28.0%). Of these, 32 patients were matched to 32 patients not requiring preoperative IABP placement. One-year mortality was not significantly different between IABP and non-IABP groups (17.0 vs 12.5%,  = 0.422). After matching, there were no significant differences in hospital LOS, ICU LOS, hours of postoperative mechanical ventilation, or complications including stroke, requirement for new renal replacement therapy, right heart failure, hemorrhagic complication, or infection requiring antibiotics. From the time of admission to within 24 hours prior to LVAD implantation, patients supported with IABP had greater reductions in systolic PAP and PCWP, and larger increases in CI.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, patients requiring IABP support for stabilization undergoing durable LVAD implant had similar 1-year survival to those not requiring IABP support. Patients supported on IABP had larger reductions in PCWP and sPAP with greater increases in CI prior to LVAD implant.

摘要

背景

主动脉内球囊反搏泵(IABP)已被用于稳定慢性心力衰竭急性失代偿患者。IABP用于优化患者以成功植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的研究尚不充分。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了2011年4月至2019年6月期间接受长期LVAD植入的18岁以上成年人。采用一对一倾向匹配法,将术前需要放置IABP的患者与不需要放置IABP的患者进行配对。评估的主要结局是1年死亡率,次要结局包括住院时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、机械通气时间和并发症。进一步分析术后收缩期肺动脉压(PAP)、心脏指数(CI)和肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)的变化。

结果

189例患者中,53例(28.0%)术前使用了IABP。其中,32例患者与32例术前不需要放置IABP的患者进行了匹配。IABP组和非IABP组的1年死亡率无显著差异(17.0%对12.5%,P = 0.422)。匹配后,两组在住院时间、ICU住院时间、术后机械通气时间或并发症(包括中风、新的肾脏替代治疗需求、右心衰竭、出血并发症或需要抗生素治疗的感染)方面无显著差异。从入院到LVAD植入前24小时,接受IABP支持的患者收缩期PAP和PCWP下降幅度更大,CI升高幅度更大。

结论

在我们的研究中,需要IABP支持以稳定病情并接受长期LVAD植入的患者与不需要IABP支持的患者1年生存率相似。在LVAD植入前,接受IABP支持的患者PCWP和sPAP下降幅度更大,CI升高幅度更大。