Thakur Suman, Chauhan Vivek, Galwankar Sagar, Lateef Fatimah, Daniel Pia, Cakir Zeynep, Lugo Katia M, Basnet Samjhana, Bildik Busra, Azahaf Siham, Vural Sevilay, Difyeli Busra H, Moreno-Walton Lisa
Indira Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Shimla, India.
Indira Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Department of Medicine, Shimla, India.
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;26(2):338-346. doi: 10.5811/westjem.29331.
The Female Leadership Academy for Medical Excellence, members of the World Academic Council of Emergency Medicine, conducted this systematic review, which explores gender disparities in burnout among emergency physicians (EP) using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Burnout is a critical issue in healthcare, particularly in emergency medicine where high stress and demanding work environments prevail.
Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed and Epistemonikos for studies using MBI-HSS to measure burnout in EPs. Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed, English-language articles reporting burnout by sex. Data extraction focused on proportions of burnout and its subcomponents, mean scores, and odds ratios, with quality assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute criteria.
We included 18 studies spanning 26,939 EPs from 10 countries. While overall burnout rates did not significantly differ between the sexes, the proportion of female EPs with high emotional exhaustion (EE) (69%) and low sense of personal accomplishment (PA) (45%) were significantly higher compared to males with high EE in 57% and low PA in 29%, respectively ( < 0.001 for both). Proportion with high depersonalization (DP) score was 44% in both male and female EPs. Mean scores revealed females experiencing higher mean EE (26.8 ± 15.7) scores vs males (25.4 ± 15.9) < 0.001. Males had mean DP scores (8.6 ± 8.0) and mean PA scores (26.6 ± 12.7) compared to females with lower mean DP scores (7.4 ± 7.2) and higher PA scores (27.7 ± 11.9), respectively < 0.001 for both. Odds ratios indicated varying risks, predominantly higher EE odds among females, varying from 0.72 to 2.3.
This review underscores gender-specific manifestations of burnout among emergency physicians, with females more susceptible to emotional exhaustion and lower sense of personal accomplishment. Standardized reporting methods are crucial for future meta-analyses to refine gender-specific interventions combating burnout in emergency medicine. Targeted strategies addressing distinct manifestations of burnout are imperative to support the well-being and retention of EPs, fostering sustainable healthcare delivery.
卓越医学女性领导力学院作为世界急诊医学学术委员会的成员,开展了这项系统评价,该评价使用马氏职业倦怠量表-人类服务调查(MBI-HSS)探讨急诊医师(EP)职业倦怠中的性别差异。职业倦怠是医疗保健领域的一个关键问题,尤其是在高压力和高要求的工作环境普遍存在的急诊医学领域。
按照PRISMA指南,我们在PubMed和Epistemonikos中检索使用MBI-HSS测量急诊医师职业倦怠的研究。纳入标准包括经同行评审的、报告按性别划分职业倦怠情况的英文文章。数据提取重点关注职业倦怠及其子成分的比例、平均得分和比值比,并使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的标准评估质量。
我们纳入了来自10个国家的18项研究,涉及26939名急诊医师。虽然总体职业倦怠率在性别之间没有显著差异,但情绪耗竭(EE)程度高的女性急诊医师比例(69%)和个人成就感(PA)低的女性急诊医师比例(45%)分别显著高于情绪耗竭程度高的男性(57%)和个人成就感低的男性(29%)(两者均P<0.001)。去人格化(DP)得分高的男性和女性急诊医师比例均为44%。平均得分显示,女性的平均情绪耗竭得分(26.8±15.7)高于男性(25.4±15.9)(P<0.001)。男性的平均去人格化得分(8.6±8.0)和平均个人成就感得分(26.6±12.7),而女性的平均去人格化得分较低(7.4±7.2),个人成就感得分较高(27.7±11.9),两者均P<0.001。比值比表明存在不同的风险,主要是女性情绪耗竭的风险较高,范围从0.72到2.3。
本评价强调了急诊医师职业倦怠的性别特异性表现,女性更容易出现情绪耗竭和个人成就感较低的情况。标准化报告方法对于未来的荟萃分析至关重要,以便完善针对急诊医学中职业倦怠的性别特异性干预措施。针对职业倦怠不同表现的针对性策略对于支持急诊医师的身心健康和留用、促进可持续的医疗服务提供至关重要。