Liu Mu-N, Chang Hsin-I, Huang Shu-Hua, Huang Chi-Wei, Hsu Shih-Wei, Lin Kun-Ju, Ho Tsung-Ying, Huang Kuo-Lun, Cheng Chih-Ming, Chang Chiung-Chih
Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112201, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112304, Taiwan.
Department of Neurology, Cognition and Aging Center, Institute for Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 2;138:111343. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111343. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
Tau-specific positron emission tomography (tau-PET) is valuable for assessing Alzheimer's disease (AD) severity, with phenotypic differences between young-onset AD (YOAD) and late-onset AD (LOAD) likely driven by distinct relationships between tau pathology and cognition.
This study developed a global tau severity (gTS) scale using Florzolotau (18F) PET and compared it with the CenTauR score for standardizing tau burden quantification.
A total of 186 participants were enrolled, including a pilot group (15 cognitive unimpaired controls [CTL], 15 AD patients) and a validation group (27 CTL, 67 YOAD, and 62 LOAD patients). In the validation group, cutoffs for diagnosing YOAD and LOAD using the gTS or CenTauR score were calculated.
The white matter region was identified as the most suitable reference for Florzolotau (18F). The gTS cutoff values of 24.1 for both AD and YOAD and 34.1 for LOAD demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, as indicated by the area under the curve (AUC). The gTS score showed a higher AUC compared to CenTauR in YOAD versus CTL or LOAD versus CTL. The gTS scores significantly predicted total scores and subdomains on cognitive ability screening instruments. Cognitive-gTS curve features were found to have quadratic and linear relationships with YOAD and LOAD, respectively, illustrating different relationships between gTS scores and cognition.
The gTS score, derived from Florzolotau (18F) PET scans, provides significant predictions regarding tau burden and cognitive measurements. The higher AUC of gTS compared to the CenTauR universal scores indicates that gTS scores offer a robust method for differentiating AD from CTL.
tau特异性正电子发射断层扫描(tau-PET)对于评估阿尔茨海默病(AD)的严重程度具有重要价值,早发型AD(YOAD)和晚发型AD(LOAD)之间的表型差异可能是由tau病理与认知之间独特的关系所驱动。
本研究使用Florzolotau(18F)PET开发了一种全球tau严重程度(gTS)量表,并将其与CenTauR评分进行比较,以标准化tau负荷定量。
共纳入186名参与者,包括一个试点组(15名认知未受损对照[CTL],15名AD患者)和一个验证组(27名CTL,67名YOAD患者和62名LOAD患者)。在验证组中,计算使用gTS或CenTauR评分诊断YOAD和LOAD的临界值。
白质区域被确定为Florzolotau(18F)最合适的参考区域。AD和YOAD的gTS临界值均为24.1,LOAD的临界值为34.1,曲线下面积(AUC)表明其诊断准确性最高。与CenTauR相比,在YOAD与CTL或LOAD与CTL的比较中,gTS评分显示出更高的AUC。gTS评分显著预测了认知能力筛查工具的总分和子领域。发现认知-gTS曲线特征与YOAD和LOAD分别具有二次和线性关系,说明了gTS评分与认知之间的不同关系。
源自Florzolotau(18F)PET扫描的gTS评分提供了有关tau负荷和认知测量的重要预测。与CenTauR通用评分相比,gTS的AUC更高,表明gTS评分提供了一种区分AD与CTL的可靠方法。