• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为预防血管内导管相关感染的皮肤消毒剂,洗必泰溶液比聚维酮碘溶液更有效:一项荟萃分析。

Chlorhexidine solutions are more effective than povidone-iodine solutions as skin disinfectants for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Deng Aiping, Xiong Fangli, Ren Qiuping

机构信息

West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92476-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-92476-w
PMID:40148400
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11950504/
Abstract

Catheter-related infections pose a significant risk to critically ill patients, making it crucial to select an appropriate sterilization solution. However, there is currently no consensus on the use of chlorhexidine-containing solutions or povidone-iodine (PVI) and the auxiliary ingredients in solutions. Meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers independently performed study screening and data extraction and used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2.0 (RoB 2.0) for quality assessment. We included 10 fully published RCTs with 12 pairs of comparisons, which included a total of 9,689 catheters. The analysis revealed that chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-containing solutions were significantly more effective than PVI in preventing CRBSI (RR = 0.460, 95% CI 0.323-0.654, P < 0.001), catheter-related sepsis (RR = 0.419, 95% CI 0.206-0.853, P = 0.016), and catheter colonization (RR = 0.409, 95% CI 0.266-0.630, P < 0.001). Further subgroup analysis demonstrated that, regardless of the concentration of CHG (≤ 1% or > 1%), it was superior to PVI in preventing CRBSI and catheter colonization (RR = 0.271 ~ 0.585, 95% CI 0.110 ~ 0.400‒0.590‒0.926). CHG-alcohol is most effective at preventing catheter-related infections, especially those caused by 70% alcohol. Compared to PVI, CHG-70% alcohol is the most effective disinfectant for preventing catheter-related infections, as it combines the rapid disinfection and evaporation properties of alcohol with the prolonged antimicrobial effects of chlorhexidine.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024507163.

摘要

导管相关感染对重症患者构成重大风险,因此选择合适的消毒溶液至关重要。然而,目前对于含氯己定溶液或聚维酮碘(PVI)及其溶液中的辅助成分的使用尚无共识。荟萃分析。检索了PubMed、EMBASE、OVID、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆数据库。两名评价员独立进行研究筛选和数据提取,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具2.0(RoB 2.0)进行质量评估。我们纳入了10项完全发表的随机对照试验,包含12组比较,共涉及9689根导管。分析显示,含葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)的溶液在预防中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)(RR = 0.460,95%可信区间0.323 - 0.654,P < 0.001)、导管相关败血症(RR = 0.419,95%可信区间0.206 - 0.853,P = 0.016)和导管定植(RR = 0.409,95%可信区间0.266 - 0.630,P < 0.001)方面显著优于PVI。进一步的亚组分析表明,无论CHG浓度(≤1%或>1%)如何,其在预防CRBSI和导管定植方面均优于PVI(RR = 0.271至0.585,95%可信区间0.110至0.400 - 0.590至0.926)。CHG - 酒精在预防导管相关感染方面最有效,尤其是由70%酒精引起的感染。与PVI相比,CHG - 70%酒精是预防导管相关感染最有效的消毒剂,因为它结合了酒精的快速消毒和挥发特性以及氯己定的长效抗菌作用。PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024507163。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ac/11950504/2a3f94fb8855/41598_2025_92476_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ac/11950504/24cf69574859/41598_2025_92476_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ac/11950504/3c550fc10c37/41598_2025_92476_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ac/11950504/93f205020a19/41598_2025_92476_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ac/11950504/2a3f94fb8855/41598_2025_92476_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ac/11950504/24cf69574859/41598_2025_92476_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ac/11950504/3c550fc10c37/41598_2025_92476_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ac/11950504/93f205020a19/41598_2025_92476_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ac/11950504/2a3f94fb8855/41598_2025_92476_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Chlorhexidine solutions are more effective than povidone-iodine solutions as skin disinfectants for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections: A meta-analysis.作为预防血管内导管相关感染的皮肤消毒剂,洗必泰溶液比聚维酮碘溶液更有效:一项荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 27;15(1):10657. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92476-w.
2
Comparison of the efficacy of three topical antiseptic solutions for the prevention of catheter colonization: a multicenter randomized controlled study.三种局部抗菌溶液预防导管定植效果的比较:一项多中心随机对照研究。
Crit Care. 2017 Dec 21;21(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1890-z.
3
Chlorhexidine disinfectant can reduce the risk of central venous catheter infection compared with povidone: a meta-analysis.洗必泰消毒剂与聚维酮相比,可降低中心静脉导管感染的风险:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Oct;47(10):1255-1262. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.02.024. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
4
Effect of skin antiseptic solutions on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.皮肤抗菌溶液对导管相关血流感染发生率的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2021 Apr;110:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.01.017. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
5
Skin antisepsis for reducing central venous catheter-related infections.用于减少中心静脉导管相关感染的皮肤消毒
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 13;7(7):CD010140. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010140.pub2.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol solution in the prevention of intravascular-catheter-related bloodstream infections in France.法国:洗必泰-酒精与聚维酮碘-酒精溶液在预防血管内导管相关血流感染中的成本效果分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 25;13(5):e0197747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197747. eCollection 2018.
7
Antimicrobial dressings for the prevention of catheter-related infections in newborn infants with central venous catheters.用于预防新生儿中心静脉导管相关感染的抗菌敷料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 23;3(3):CD011082. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011082.pub2.
8
Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis.氯己定与聚维酮碘溶液用于血管导管部位护理的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 4;136(11):792-801. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00007.
9
Skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol, with and without skin scrubbing, for prevention of intravascular-catheter-related infection (CLEAN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, two-by-two factorial trial.氯己定-酒精与聚维酮碘-酒精皮肤消毒,联合或不联合皮肤刷洗,用于预防血管内导管相关感染(CLEAN):一项开放标签、多中心、随机、对照、两因素析因试验。
Lancet. 2015 Nov 21;386(10008):2069-2077. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00244-5. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
10
Chlorhexidine plus alcohol versus povidone iodine plus alcohol, combined or not with innovative devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter infection and failure (CLEAN 3 study): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single centre, randomised-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial.氯己定加酒精与聚维酮碘加酒精对比,联合或不联合创新设备,用于预防短期外周静脉导管感染和失败(CLEAN 3研究):一项研究者发起的、开放标签、单中心、随机对照、二乘二析因试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;21(7):1038-1048. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30738-6. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
The practice of arterial catheters in ICUs and nurses' perceptions of infection prevention: A multicentre cross-sectional study.重症监护病房动脉置管的实践和护士对感染预防的认知:一项多中心横断面研究。
J Vasc Access. 2024 Mar;25(2):592-598. doi: 10.1177/11297298221129000. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
2
Tunneled catheter-related bacteremia in hemodialysis patients: incidence, risk factors and outcomes. A 14-year observational study.血液透析患者隧道式导管相关菌血症:一项 14 年观察性研究的发生率、危险因素和结局。
J Nephrol. 2023 Jan;36(1):203-212. doi: 10.1007/s40620-022-01408-8. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
3
Multiple cases of sensitization to an antiseptic containing chlorhexidine digluconate/benzalkonium chloride/benzyl alcohol with different profiles of sensitization in adults and children.
多例成人和儿童对含有氯己定葡萄糖酸盐/苯扎氯铵/苯甲醇的消毒剂出现不同过敏谱的致敏反应。
Contact Dermatitis. 2022 Jul;87(1):62-70. doi: 10.1111/cod.14085. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
4
Chlorhexidine plus alcohol versus povidone iodine plus alcohol, combined or not with innovative devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter infection and failure (CLEAN 3 study): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single centre, randomised-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial.氯己定加酒精与聚维酮碘加酒精对比,联合或不联合创新设备,用于预防短期外周静脉导管感染和失败(CLEAN 3研究):一项研究者发起的、开放标签、单中心、随机对照、二乘二析因试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;21(7):1038-1048. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30738-6. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Effect of skin antiseptic solutions on the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.皮肤抗菌溶液对导管相关血流感染发生率的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Hosp Infect. 2021 Apr;110:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.01.017. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
6
Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit.基于专家共识的重症监护病房血管内导管管理临床实践指南
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00713-4.
7
Excluding non-English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: a meta-epidemiological study.排除非英语文献对证据综合没有改变结论:一项meta 流行病学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;118:42-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
8
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
9
Chlorhexidine disinfectant can reduce the risk of central venous catheter infection compared with povidone: a meta-analysis.洗必泰消毒剂与聚维酮相比,可降低中心静脉导管感染的风险:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Oct;47(10):1255-1262. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.02.024. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
10
A retrospective study of tunnelled haemodialysis central line-associated bloodstream infections.一项关于带隧道血液透析中心静脉导管相关血流感染的回顾性研究。
J Chemother. 2019 May;31(3):132-136. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2019.1595894. Epub 2019 Apr 1.