de Visser Mara, Juurlink Trees, Bosma Astrid, Zijl Marloes, Anema Johannes R, Huysmans Maaike A
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van Der Boechorstraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Societal Participation and Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):1164. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22300-7.
Previous studies among people with work disabilities (WD) showed that during the COVID-19 pandemic they were at risk for negative outcomes on work participation and health. These studies focused on people's own accounts of their difficulties to work and did not include the policy and practice perspective. The aim of the present study was to explore the policy and practice perspective on what can be learned from the impact of the COVID-19 crisis, and what is needed to enhance work participation among people with WD, in times of crisis and beyond.
We used a multi-stakeholder perspective qualitative approach. Between March 2021 and September 2022, twenty-five semi-structured in-depth online interviews were conducted with occupational health professionals (13), employers (7) and policymakers (5). Participants were asked to share their experiences about employees or job seekers with work disabilities on (re)gaining and maintaining paid employment, barriers and facilitators for work participation during the Covid-19 crisis and what is needed to enhance work participation among people with WD in times of crisis and beyond. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis.
The results indicated that, although employers rapidly implemented new working arrangements, people with WD had a vulnerable labour market position during the COVID-19 crisis, especially those with temporary contracts. Job loss and detrimental effects on mental health were identified. Other barriers to work participation included hampered collaboration between stakeholders during lockdowns and fewer job opportunities due to workplace shutdowns. Nevertheless, employers and occupational health professionals noticed that some employees were surprisingly flexible and capable with regard to performing alternative work tasks. We also identified ways to improve work participation for people with WD, including simplifying legislation and establishing sustainable policies on employment, investing in career development, creating an inclusive organizational culture and increasing accessibility to information and support assistance.
People with WD had a vulnerable labour market position during the COVID-19 crisis. The introduction of new working arrangements became widespread during the COVID-19 crisis, which had both positive and negative consequences for people with WD. Our results showed that improving work participation for people with WD requires a multifaceted approach, which can be achieved by the practical and policy recommendations offered by this study.
先前针对有工作障碍(WD)人群的研究表明,在新冠疫情期间,他们在工作参与和健康方面面临负面结果的风险。这些研究侧重于人们对自身工作困难的描述,未纳入政策和实践视角。本研究的目的是从政策和实践角度探讨从新冠危机的影响中可以学到什么,以及在危机期间及之后提高有WD人群的工作参与度需要什么。
我们采用了多利益相关者视角的定性方法。在2021年3月至2022年9月期间,对职业健康专业人员(13名)、雇主(7名)和政策制定者(5名)进行了25次半结构化深度在线访谈。参与者被要求分享他们关于有工作障碍的员工或求职者在(重新)获得和维持有偿就业方面的经历、新冠危机期间工作参与的障碍和促进因素,以及在危机期间及之后提高有WD人群工作参与度需要什么。使用主题内容分析法对数据进行分析。
结果表明,尽管雇主迅速实施了新的工作安排,但在新冠危机期间,有WD的人在劳动力市场上处于弱势地位,尤其是那些持有临时合同的人。发现了失业以及对心理健康的不利影响。工作参与的其他障碍包括封锁期间利益相关者之间的协作受阻以及工作场所关闭导致的就业机会减少。然而,雇主和职业健康专业人员注意到,一些员工在执行替代工作任务方面出奇地灵活且有能力。我们还确定了提高有WD人群工作参与度的方法,包括简化立法并制定可持续的就业政策、投资职业发展、营造包容的组织文化以及增加信息和支持援助的可及性。
在新冠危机期间,有WD的人在劳动力市场上处于弱势地位。新工作安排在新冠危机期间广泛推行,这对有WD的人既有积极影响也有消极影响。我们的结果表明,提高有WD人群的工作参与度需要多方面的方法,这可以通过本研究提出的实践和政策建议来实现。