Zhao Wenzhi, Jia Zhongwei, Shi Hanping
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
National Institute of Drug Dependence, School of Public Health, Peking University, Peking University, Beijing, China.
BMC Nutr. 2025 Mar 27;11(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40795-025-00999-2.
Chinese cuisines are celebrated for their remarkable qualities in color, aroma, and taste. There are eight major culinary styles, each characterized by its distinct flavors. The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) serves as a comprehensive measure of the inflammatory potential of diet and is designed for universal applicability in dietary assessments across all human studies.
The ingredients, food composition, and Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) of dishes from the eight major cuisines of China were analyzed based on two cookbooks. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was utilized for the analysis of non-normally distributed data. Additionally, systematic cluster analysis and chi-square analysis were conducted.
A total of 980 dishes representing eight distinct cuisines were included in this study. Condiments emerged as the most prevalent ingredient across the various cuisines. In terms of standard servings (per 100 g), Sichuan cuisine exhibited the highest levels of energy (calories) and fat content. Conversely, Zhejiang cuisine displayed the highest carbohydrate content, whereas Sichuan cuisine recorded the lowest. When evaluated per energy-equivalent serving (per 2056 kcal), dishes from Sichuan cuisine contained the highest amounts of total fat and dietary fiber. In contrast, Fujian cuisine had the highest carbohydrate content, while Sichuan cuisine again had the lowest. Similarly, dishes from Anhui cuisine demonstrated the highest levels of protein and niacin, whereas Sichuan cuisine had the lowest. A significant difference was observed among the cuisines concerning the distribution of the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII). The percentage of pro-inflammatory dishes was highest in Anhui cuisine (63.1%) and lowest in Sichuan cuisine (41.9%). Additionally, Sichuan cuisine exhibited the highest percentage of high fat-protein dishes, while Anhui cuisine had the lowest, with a statistically significant difference.
Distinct Chinese cuisines demonstrated varying preferences for ingredient selection, which can be partially attributed to the unique tastes associated with local culinary traditions. The energy and nutrient composition across different cuisines exhibited significant variability. Notably, the proportion of pro-inflammatory dishes was highest in Anhui cuisine, while Sichuan cuisine surprisingly contained the lowest percentage.
中国菜肴以其在色、香、味方面的卓越品质而闻名。有八大主要烹饪风格,每种风格都有其独特的风味。饮食炎症指数(DII)是饮食炎症潜力的综合衡量指标,旨在普遍适用于所有人类研究中的饮食评估。
基于两本食谱分析了中国八大菜系菜肴的食材、食物成分和饮食炎症指数(DII)。采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验分析非正态分布数据。此外,还进行了系统聚类分析和卡方分析。
本研究共纳入代表八大菜系的980道菜肴。调味品是各菜系中最常见的食材。按标准份量(每100克)计算,川菜的能量(卡路里)和脂肪含量最高。相反,浙菜的碳水化合物含量最高,而川菜的碳水化合物含量最低。按能量等效份量(每2056千卡)计算,川菜的总脂肪和膳食纤维含量最高。相比之下,闽菜的碳水化合物含量最高,而川菜再次最低。同样,徽菜的蛋白质和烟酸含量最高,而川菜最低。各菜系在饮食炎症指数(DII)分布上存在显著差异。促炎菜肴的比例在徽菜中最高(63.1%),在川菜中最低(41.9%)。此外,川菜中高脂肪高蛋白菜肴的比例最高,而徽菜中最低,差异具有统计学意义。
不同的中国菜系在食材选择上表现出不同的偏好,这部分可归因于当地烹饪传统所带来的独特口味。不同菜系的能量和营养成分存在显著差异。值得注意的是,促炎菜肴的比例在徽菜中最高,而川菜中令人惊讶地最低。