Molecular Medicine Research Center, Biomedicine Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 5166614711, Iran.
Department of Biochemistry and Dietetics, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 5166614711, Iran.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022 Aug;76(8):1073-1087. doi: 10.1038/s41430-021-01039-5. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
This updated meta-analysis sought to determine whether the pro-inflammatory potential of diet is a risk factor for breast cancer (BrCa) development, for the first time focusing on the effects of design heterogeneity. The search was performed using Scopus, PubMed, and Embase databases. Data were extracted from twenty-one eligible studies, including eleven cohorts (336,085 participants/20,033 incidence cases), and ten case-control studies (9,833 cases/12,752controls). The random-effect was used to calculate the relative risk (RR) using STATA 16 software. The highest dietary inflammatory index (DII) vs. the lowest category showed 16% increased risk of BrCa (95% CI: 1.06-1.26; I = 62.8%, P (I) < 0.001). This was notable in post-menopausal status (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04-1.22), women with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.07-1.63), and study populations from developing countries (RR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.12-2.47). Methodological covariates were subject to subgroup meta-analyses and showed stronger results among case-control studies (RR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.20-1.80), studies considered age-matched controls (RR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.19-1.93) and hospital-based controls (RR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.58-2.64), and cohort studies identified by prolong follow-up durations (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.22). This updated meta-analysis highlighted the pro-inflammatory diet as a risk factor for BrCa, especially among women in post-menopausal status, obese groups, and developing countries. Meta-analysis in methodological subgroups could improve results, less affected by heterogeneity, and suggested subclassification with important implications for future epidemiological designs and even clinical management.
本更新的荟萃分析旨在确定饮食的促炎潜力是否是乳腺癌(BrCa)发展的风险因素,这是首次关注设计异质性的影响。使用 Scopus、PubMed 和 Embase 数据库进行了搜索。数据取自 21 项符合条件的研究,包括 11 项队列研究(336085 名参与者/20033 例发病)和 10 项病例对照研究(9833 例/12752 例对照)。使用 STATA 16 软件采用随机效应计算相对风险(RR)。最高的饮食炎症指数(DII)与最低类别相比,BrCa 的风险增加了 16%(95%CI:1.06-1.26;I=62.8%,P(I)<0.001)。绝经后状态(RR=1.13,95%CI:1.04-1.22)、体重指数(BMI)≥30kg/m(RR=1.35,95%CI:1.07-1.63)和发展中国家的研究人群中,这一差异更为显著(RR=1.79,95%CI:1.12-2.47)。方法学协变量进行了亚组荟萃分析,结果表明病例对照研究中的结果更强(RR=1.50,95%CI:1.20-1.80)、考虑年龄匹配对照(RR=1.56,95%CI:1.19-1.93)和基于医院的对照(RR=2.11,95%CI:1.58-2.64)以及随访时间较长的队列研究(RR=1.13,95%CI:1.03-1.22)。本更新的荟萃分析强调了促炎饮食是 BrCa 的一个风险因素,特别是绝经后妇女、肥胖人群和发展中国家的女性。方法学亚组中的荟萃分析可以改善结果,受异质性的影响较小,并建议进行亚分类,这对未来的流行病学设计甚至临床管理具有重要意义。