Shrestha Rima, Sohail Mohammad Nasim, Varga Csaba
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine Peoria, Peoria, IL 61605, USA.
Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Mar 9;14(3):282. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030282.
: Understanding beef cattle farmers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices on infectious disease prevention, antimicrobial use, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is important to developing stewardship programs. : A cross-sectional stratified mail or phone survey of beef cattle producers in Illinois was conducted between June and August 2022. Ordinal logistic regression models assessed the impact of having a biosecurity plan on beef cattle farmers' familiarity with cattle diseases. Logistic regression models evaluated associations between antimicrobial treatment practices and the type of cattle operations. : A total of 514 producers responded to all or some of the questions. Only 45% of producers were familiar with AMR, and 11% were concerned about cattle infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Producers agreed or strongly agreed (64%) that inappropriate AMU contributes to the development of AMR. Most producers (70%) thought that antimicrobials were as effective in treating infectious diseases as 5 years ago. Only 50% of farms were visited by a veterinarian in the previous year and 35% had their biosecurity evaluated. Producers were more familiar with infectious diseases if their farm biosecurity was assessed. Treating respiratory infections was the most common reason for antimicrobial use. Compared to cow-calf farmers, whole-cycle farmers had a higher probability of having their farm's biosecurity evaluated (OR = 1.66) and having a veterinarian visit in the previous year (OR = 2.16). Whole-cycle (OR = 3.92) and stocker/backgrounder (OR = 2.18) farmers had a higher probability of treating their cattle with antibiotics than cow-calf farmers. : Antimicrobial stewardship and farm biosecurity programs are needed to raise awareness of disease prevention, AMU, and AMR among Illinois beef cattle producers.
了解肉牛养殖户在传染病预防、抗菌药物使用及抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)方面的知识、态度和做法,对于制定管理计划至关重要。2022年6月至8月期间,对伊利诺伊州的肉牛养殖户开展了一项横断面分层邮件或电话调查。有序逻辑回归模型评估了制定生物安全计划对肉牛养殖户熟悉牛病情况的影响。逻辑回归模型评估了抗菌治疗做法与养牛场类型之间的关联。共有514名养殖户回答了全部或部分问题。只有45%的养殖户了解AMR,11%的养殖户担心牛感染抗生素耐药菌。养殖户同意或强烈同意(64%)不恰当的抗菌药物使用会导致AMR的产生。大多数养殖户(70%)认为抗菌药物治疗传染病的效果与5年前一样。上一年只有50%的养殖场接受过兽医检查,35%的养殖场接受过生物安全评估。如果养殖场进行了生物安全评估,养殖户对传染病会更熟悉。治疗呼吸道感染是使用抗菌药物最常见的原因。与母牛-犊牛养殖户相比,全周期养殖户对养殖场进行生物安全评估(比值比=1.66)以及上一年有兽医来访(比值比=2.16)的可能性更高。全周期养殖户(比值比=3.92)和饲养/育成期养殖户(比值比=2.18)给牛使用抗生素的可能性高于母牛-犊牛养殖户。需要开展抗菌药物管理和养殖场生物安全计划,以提高伊利诺伊州肉牛养殖户对疾病预防、抗菌药物使用及AMR的认识。