Lee Jimin J, Bortolussi-Courval Émilie, Filosa Eva, Rej Soham, Godard-Sebillote Claire, Tamblyn Robyn, Lee Todd C, McDonald Emily G
Division of Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, Lady Davis Institute/Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jun;73(6):1918-1928. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19457. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
Polypharmacy is a major risk factor for adverse drug events (ADEs), which are a common cause of hospitalization, especially among older adults. Deprescribing is a promising strategy to prevent ADEs; however, clinicians may hesitate to deprescribe for fear of causing adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs). Collectively, ADWEs are the re-emergence of symptoms or a disease state due to the discontinuation of a medication. Although capturing ADWEs is critical to understanding the complications that might arise from deprescribing, these events may not be routinely or systematically captured in clinical trials.
We aimed to determine the frequency of ADWE reporting, compare the strengths and limitations of different approaches, and compare the rates of the number of ADWEs detected across trials.
A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. The search strategy was developed with a research librarian, and studies were identified using Ovid Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 2, 2024. We included all randomized controlled trials testing a deprescribing intervention in older adults (mean or median age ≥ 65 years) and analyzed a subsample of the studies reporting ADWEs as an outcome.
Among the 139 eligible studies that were identified, only 12 reported an ADWE. These studies utilized 6 approaches to capture ADWEs: Naranjo ADWE Probability Scale; clinical monitoring for specific withdrawal symptoms; identification through ICD-10 codes; identification of ADWEs as a subset of confirmed ADEs; patient/caregiver self-report; and clinical judgment.
Results confirmed that few deprescribing studies capture ADWEs and there is a lack of standardized reporting. A harmonized approach to capturing ADWEs with specific criteria could ensure more consistent results in deprescribing trials, improve our understanding of this important outcome, and facilitate future meta-analyses.
多重用药是不良药物事件(ADEs)的主要风险因素,而ADEs是住院的常见原因,在老年人中尤为如此。减药是预防ADEs的一种有前景的策略;然而,临床医生可能因担心引起药物撤药不良事件(ADWEs)而犹豫是否进行减药。总体而言,ADWEs是由于停药导致症状或疾病状态再次出现。尽管记录ADWEs对于理解减药可能引发的并发症至关重要,但这些事件在临床试验中可能未被常规或系统地记录。
我们旨在确定ADWE报告的频率,比较不同方法的优缺点,并比较各试验中检测到的ADWE数量的发生率。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目清单进行系统评价。搜索策略由一名研究馆员制定,使用Ovid Medline、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库从数据库建立至2024年7月2日识别研究。我们纳入了所有在老年人(平均或中位年龄≥65岁)中测试减药干预的随机对照试验,并分析了将ADWEs作为结果报告的研究的一个子样本。
在识别出的139项符合条件的研究中,只有12项报告了ADWEs。这些研究采用了6种方法来记录ADWEs:纳伦霍ADWE概率量表;对特定撤药症状的临床监测;通过国际疾病分类第10版(ICD - 10)编码识别;将ADWEs识别为已确认ADEs的一个子集;患者/照顾者自我报告;以及临床判断。
结果证实,很少有减药研究记录ADWEs,且缺乏标准化报告。采用统一方法并制定特定标准来记录ADWEs,可以确保减药试验结果更一致,增进我们对这一重要结果的理解,并促进未来的Meta分析。