• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Creative constraints: Brain activity and network dynamics underlying semantic interference during idea production.创造性限制:创意生成过程中语义干扰背后的大脑活动和网络动态
Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 8.
2
Default network contributions to episodic and semantic processing during divergent creative thinking: A representational similarity analysis.默认网络在发散性创造性思维过程中对情景和语义处理的贡献:基于代表性相似性分析。
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 1;209:116499. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116499. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
3
Intrinsic default-executive coupling of the creative aging brain.创意老化大脑的内在默认执行耦合。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Mar 5;14(3):291-303. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz013.
4
Brain networks underlying novel metaphor production.产生新颖隐喻的脑网络。
Brain Cogn. 2017 Feb;111:163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
5
Creative aging: functional brain networks associated with divergent thinking in older and younger adults.创意老龄化:与老年人和年轻人发散思维相关的功能性大脑网络。
Neurobiol Aging. 2019 Mar;75:150-158. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
6
Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest.创造力与默认网络:静息状态下创造性大脑的功能连接性分析。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Nov;64:92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.019. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
7
Chain free association, creativity, and the default mode network.无链自由联想、创造力与默认模式网络。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Sep;118(Pt A):40-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
8
EEG signals respond differently to idea generation, idea evolution and evaluation in a loosely controlled creativity experiment.脑电图信号在一个松散控制的创造力实验中对创意生成、创意演变和评估的反应不同。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 22;11(1):2119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81655-0.
9
Default Mode and Executive Networks Areas: Association with the Serial Order in Divergent Thinking.默认模式网络和执行网络区域:与发散性思维中的序列顺序的关联。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 14;11(9):e0162234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162234. eCollection 2016.
10
Neural Mechanisms of Episodic Retrieval Support Divergent Creative Thinking.情节检索的神经机制支持发散性创造性思维。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jan 1;29(1):150-166. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx312.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia as a model for understanding the cognitive and cerebral determinants of verbal creativity.行为变异型额颞叶痴呆作为理解言语创造力的认知和大脑决定因素的模型。
Behav Brain Funct. 2025 Aug 23;21(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12993-025-00292-z.
2
Neural basis underlying the association between openness/intellect and scientific creativity achievement: the mediation role of the inferior frontal gyrus.开放性/智力与科学创造力成就之间关联的神经基础:额下回的中介作用。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 12;13(1):899. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03157-2.
3
Semantic memory and creative evaluation.语义记忆与创造性评估。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 24;13(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03124-x.
4
Creativity supports learning through associative thinking.创造力通过联想思维支持学习。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2025 Jul 1;10(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00334-1.
5
Neural dynamics of semantic control underlying generative storytelling.生成性叙事背后语义控制的神经动力学
Commun Biol. 2025 Mar 28;8(1):513. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07913-3.
6
Hidden Brain States Reveal the Temporal Dynamics of Neural Oscillations During Metaphor Generation and Their Role in Verbal Creativity.隐藏的脑状态揭示隐喻生成过程中神经振荡的时间动态及其在语言创造力中的作用。
Psychophysiology. 2025 Feb;62(2):e70023. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70023.
7
Oxytocin enhances creativity specifically in approach-motivated individuals.催产素特别能增强有进取动机个体的创造力。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Mar 4;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf004.
8
How Psychedelics Modulate Multiple Memory Mechanisms in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.迷幻剂如何调节创伤后应激障碍中的多种记忆机制。
Drugs. 2024 Nov;84(11):1419-1443. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02106-4. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
9
EEG-based study of design creativity: a review on research design, experiments, and analysis.基于脑电图的设计创造力研究:关于研究设计、实验与分析的综述
Front Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug 1;18:1331396. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1331396. eCollection 2024.
10
Individual differences and creative ideation: neuromodulatory signatures of mindset and response inhibition.个体差异与创造性思维:思维模式和反应抑制的神经调节特征
Front Neurosci. 2023 Dec 6;17:1238165. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1238165. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Longitudinal Alterations of Frontoparietal and Frontotemporal Networks Predict Future Creative Cognitive Ability.前额顶叶和额颞叶网络的纵向变化可预测未来的创造性认知能力。
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Jan 1;28(1):103-115. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw353.
2
Functional Fixedness in Creative Thinking Tasks Depends on Stimulus Modality.创造性思维任务中的功能固着取决于刺激方式。
Psychol Aesthet Creat Arts. 2016 Nov;10(4):425-435. doi: 10.1037/aca0000050. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
3
Remembering the past and imagining the future: Identifying and enhancing the contribution of episodic memory.铭记过去,畅想未来:识别并增强情景记忆的作用。
Mem Stud. 2016;9(3):245-255. doi: 10.1177/1750698016645230. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
4
Brain morphometry predicts individual creative potential and the ability to combine remote ideas.脑形态测量学可预测个体的创造性潜力以及整合远距离想法的能力。
Cortex. 2017 Jan;86:216-229. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.021. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
5
Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework.思维漫游即自发性思维:一个动态框架。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Nov;17(11):718-731. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.113. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
6
Episodic specificity induction impacts activity in a core brain network during construction of imagined future experiences.情景特异性诱导在构建想象的未来经历过程中影响核心脑网络的活动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 20;113(38):10696-701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612278113. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
7
Down but not out in posterior cingulate cortex: Deactivation yet functional coupling with prefrontal cortex during demanding semantic cognition.后扣带回皮层虽受抑制但未失活:在要求较高的语义认知过程中与前额叶皮层失活却存在功能耦合
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 1;141:366-377. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.060. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
8
The imaginative mind.富有想象力的头脑。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Nov;37(11):4197-4211. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23300.
9
Dynamic network interactions supporting internally-oriented cognition.支持内导向认知的动态网络交互。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016 Oct;40:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2016.06.014. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
10
Changes in Brain Activation Associated with Spontaneous Improvization and Figural Creativity After Design-Thinking-Based Training: A Longitudinal fMRI Study.基于设计思维训练的自发性即兴创作和图形创造力相关的大脑激活变化:一项纵向 fMRI 研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Jul 1;27(7):3542-3552. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw171.

创造性限制:创意生成过程中语义干扰背后的大脑活动和网络动态

Creative constraints: Brain activity and network dynamics underlying semantic interference during idea production.

作者信息

Beaty Roger E, Christensen Alexander P, Benedek Mathias, Silvia Paul J, Schacter Daniel L

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.012
PMID:28082106
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6083214/
Abstract

Functional neuroimaging research has recently revealed brain network interactions during performance on creative thinking tasks-particularly among regions of the default and executive control networks-but the cognitive mechanisms related to these interactions remain poorly understood. Here we test the hypothesis that the executive control network can interact with the default network to inhibit salient conceptual knowledge (i.e., pre-potent responses) elicited from memory during creative idea production. Participants studied common noun-verb pairs and were given a cued-recall test with corrective feedback to strengthen the paired association in memory. They then completed a verb generation task that presented either a previously studied noun (high-constraint) or an unstudied noun (low-constraint), and were asked to "think creatively" while searching for a novel verb to relate to the presented noun. Latent Semantic Analysis of verbal responses showed decreased semantic distance values in the high-constraint (i.e., interference) condition, which corresponded to increased neural activity within regions of the default (posterior cingulate cortex and bilateral angular gyri), salience (right anterior insula), and executive control (left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) networks. Independent component analysis of intrinsic functional connectivity networks extended this finding by revealing differential interactions among these large-scale networks across the task conditions. The results suggest that interactions between the default and executive control networks underlie response inhibition during constrained idea production, providing insight into specific neurocognitive mechanisms supporting creative cognition.

摘要

功能神经影像学研究最近揭示了在创造性思维任务执行过程中的大脑网络交互作用——尤其是在默认网络和执行控制网络的区域之间——但与这些交互作用相关的认知机制仍知之甚少。在这里,我们检验了一个假设,即执行控制网络可以与默认网络相互作用,以抑制在创造性想法产生过程中从记忆中引发的显著概念性知识(即优势反应)。参与者学习了常见的名词 - 动词对,并进行了带有纠正反馈的线索回忆测试,以加强记忆中的配对关联。然后,他们完成了一个动词生成任务,该任务呈现了一个之前学习过的名词(高约束条件)或一个未学习过的名词(低约束条件),并要求他们在寻找与呈现的名词相关的新颖动词时“创造性地思考”。对言语反应的潜在语义分析表明,在高约束(即干扰)条件下语义距离值降低,这与默认网络(后扣带回皮质和双侧角回)、突显网络(右前脑岛)和执行控制网络(左背外侧前额叶皮质)区域内神经活动的增加相对应。对内在功能连接网络的独立成分分析扩展了这一发现,揭示了跨任务条件下这些大规模网络之间的差异交互作用。结果表明,默认网络和执行控制网络之间的交互作用是受限想法产生过程中反应抑制的基础,为支持创造性认知的特定神经认知机制提供了见解。