Goldberg S J, Dickinson D F, Wilson N
Br Heart J. 1985 Jul;54(1):68-75. doi: 10.1136/hrt.54.1.68.
To evaluate a method for measuring blood flow through the mitral valve 18 normal subjects and 19 patients with cardiac disease in whom mitral and aortic blood flows were identical were studied. Initially the mitral ring area was planimetered from the echocardiographic image, but the results of area calculation using the mathematical formula for the area of an ellipse were found to approximate to within 8% of the planimetered result in most cases. The formula was therefore used if the ring appeared elliptical on the cross sectional echo image, and other shapes were planimetered. Mitral velocity, aligned with flow in three planes, was recorded just distal to the ring. Mitral flow calculated using the elliptical technique correlated closely with flow measured in the ascending aorta by the Doppler technique and also with systemic flow measured by the Fick method at cardiac catheterisation in 10 patients. The mitral flow technique that assumed a circular orifice correlated almost as well with Doppler aortic flow and with Fick flow but overestimated flow by a mean of 1446 ml, whereas the elliptical method had a mean error of only 138 ml. Both methods correlated well with standards, but the elliptical method was easy to apply and gave a better correlation with comparison reference values.
为评估一种测量通过二尖瓣血流量的方法,对18名正常受试者和19名二尖瓣与主动脉血流量相同的心脏病患者进行了研究。最初,通过超声心动图图像用求积仪测量二尖瓣环面积,但发现使用椭圆面积数学公式计算面积的结果在大多数情况下与求积仪测量结果的误差在8%以内。因此,如果在横截面回声图像上二尖瓣环呈椭圆形,则使用该公式,其他形状则用求积仪测量。在二尖瓣环远端记录与三个平面血流对齐的二尖瓣流速。使用椭圆技术计算的二尖瓣血流与通过多普勒技术在升主动脉中测量的血流密切相关,并且与通过菲克法在10名患者心导管检查时测量的全身血流也密切相关。假设为圆形孔口的二尖瓣血流技术与多普勒主动脉血流和菲克血流的相关性几乎相同,但平均高估血流1446毫升,而椭圆法的平均误差仅为138毫升。两种方法与标准的相关性都很好,但椭圆法易于应用,并且与比较参考值的相关性更好。