• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用基于计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影图像的深度学习模型对随机急性肺栓塞病例进行定量评估和风险分层。

Quantitative assessment and risk stratification of random acute pulmonary embolism cases using a deep learning model based on computed tomography pulmonary angiography images.

作者信息

Qiao Yang, Gao Yaozong, Chen Yanbo, Ye Xiaodan, Yan Cheng, Zeng Mengsu

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):1950-1962. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1412. Epub 2025 Feb 26.

DOI:10.21037/qims-24-1412
PMID:40160671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11948401/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). The semi-quantitative clot burden scoring based on imaging is related to the risk stratification and prognosis of acute PE, but it cannot be widely applied in the clinic due to the difficulty of calculation. This study developed a high-quality VB-Net deep learning (DL) model combined with Transformer, which can detect PE from images and automatically calculate the clot burden score (CBS). The aim of this study was to help patients via earlier diagnosis, risk stratification, and determination of treatment plans, thereby improving prognosis, as well as alleviate the burden on radiologists. To our knowledge, no related studies have been reported.

METHODS

A retrospective inclusion of 2,424 CTPA examination cases (44% male) were conducted to train and test the VB-Net DL model for the detection of PE and to evaluate the clot burden volume and scoring. Area under the curve (AUC), and sensitivity and specificity on the case or clot level were used to evaluate the model's performance. Random CTPA data from Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University (30 cases with acute PE, 40 cases without PE) were applied to test the relationship between the clot burden automatically calculated by the model and the Qanadli score determined manually, as well as other imaging parameters.

RESULTS

The performance of the VB-Net DL model on the testing set had an AUC of 0.972 based on the case level. The sensitivity at the operational point of the model threshold selected was 94.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8650-0.9828], and the specificity was 89.4% (95% CI: 0.8407-0.9308). In the random CTPA examinations from this research center, the model's sensitivity based on the case was 76.67% (95% CI: 0.5880-0.8848), the specificity was 95.00% (95% CI: 0.8261-0.9950), the positive predictive value (PPV) was 92.00%, and the accuracy was 87.14%. On the clot-based level, the sensitivity was 84.43%, the PPV was 87.29%, and the false positive rate was 0.19 per case. The clot burden volume and score automatically measured by the model were significantly correlated with the manually determined Qanadli score (r=0.866, P<0.001 and r=0.899, P<0.001, respectively). The severity grading of the CBS groups was consistent with the degree of right ventricular dilation.

CONCLUSIONS

The VB-Net DL model based on CTPA could conveniently and efficiently detect and quantitatively evaluate PE.

摘要

背景

计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影(CTPA)是诊断肺栓塞(PE)的金标准。基于影像的半定量血栓负荷评分与急性PE的危险分层及预后相关,但由于计算困难,无法在临床广泛应用。本研究开发了一种结合Transformer的高质量VB-Net深度学习(DL)模型,该模型可从图像中检测PE并自动计算血栓负荷评分(CBS)。本研究的目的是通过早期诊断、危险分层和确定治疗方案来帮助患者,从而改善预后,并减轻放射科医生的负担。据我们所知,尚未有相关研究报道。

方法

回顾性纳入2424例CTPA检查病例(44%为男性),用于训练和测试VB-Net DL模型以检测PE并评估血栓负荷量及评分。采用曲线下面积(AUC)以及病例或血栓水平的敏感性和特异性来评估模型性能。应用复旦大学附属中山医院的随机CTPA数据(30例急性PE、40例无PE)来测试模型自动计算的血栓负荷与手动确定的Qanadli评分以及其他影像参数之间的关系。

结果

VB-Net DL模型在测试集上基于病例水平的AUC为0.972。所选模型阈值操作点处的敏感性为94.6%[95%置信区间(CI):0.8650 - 0.9828],特异性为89.4%(95%CI:0.8407 - 0.9308)。在本研究中心的随机CTPA检查中,基于病例的模型敏感性为76.67%(95%CI:0.5880 - 0.8848),特异性为95.00%(95%CI:0.8261 - 0.9950),阳性预测值(PPV)为92.00%,准确性为87.14%。在基于血栓的水平上,敏感性为84.43%,PPV为87.29%,每例假阳性率为0.19。模型自动测量的血栓负荷量和评分与手动确定的Qanadli评分显著相关(分别为r = 0.866,P < 0.001和r = 0.899,P < 0.001)。CBS组的严重程度分级与右心室扩张程度一致。

结论

基于CTPA的VB-Net DL模型能够方便、高效地检测并定量评估PE。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/d5ac8bc2e609/qims-15-03-1950-f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/28b2d57c7c56/qims-15-03-1950-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/73e163badca4/qims-15-03-1950-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/48e48053c471/qims-15-03-1950-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/e8d0d2cce053/qims-15-03-1950-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/ad06a363a970/qims-15-03-1950-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/139a4288817e/qims-15-03-1950-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/5945be358505/qims-15-03-1950-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/c7546c28945a/qims-15-03-1950-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/4e27aa1be08f/qims-15-03-1950-f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/d5ac8bc2e609/qims-15-03-1950-f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/28b2d57c7c56/qims-15-03-1950-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/73e163badca4/qims-15-03-1950-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/48e48053c471/qims-15-03-1950-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/e8d0d2cce053/qims-15-03-1950-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/ad06a363a970/qims-15-03-1950-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/139a4288817e/qims-15-03-1950-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/5945be358505/qims-15-03-1950-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/c7546c28945a/qims-15-03-1950-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/4e27aa1be08f/qims-15-03-1950-f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2aec/11948401/d5ac8bc2e609/qims-15-03-1950-f10.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantitative assessment and risk stratification of random acute pulmonary embolism cases using a deep learning model based on computed tomography pulmonary angiography images.使用基于计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影图像的深度学习模型对随机急性肺栓塞病例进行定量评估和风险分层。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):1950-1962. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1412. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
2
Evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism and clot burden on CTPA with deep learning.基于深度学习的 CTPA 评估急性肺栓塞和栓子负荷。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jun;30(6):3567-3575. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06699-8. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
3
Clot burden of acute pulmonary thromboembolism: comparison of two deep learning algorithms, Qanadli score, and Mastora score.急性肺血栓栓塞症的血栓负荷:两种深度学习算法、Qanadli评分和Mastora评分的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Jan;12(1):66-79. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-140.
4
Clot ratio, new clot burden score with deep learning, correlates with the risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism.凝血比例,即通过深度学习得出的新的血栓负荷评分,与急性肺栓塞患者的风险分层相关。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Jan 3;14(1):86-97. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-322. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
5
Risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism based on the clot volume and right ventricular dysfunction on CT pulmonary angiography.基于CT肺血管造影的血栓体积和右心室功能障碍对急性肺栓塞进行风险分层。
Clin Respir J. 2019 Nov;13(11):674-682. doi: 10.1111/crj.13064. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
6
To Study the Correlation of Clinical Severity and Cytokine Storm in COVID-19 Pulmonary Embolism Patients by Using Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) Qanadli Clot Burden Scoring System.利用计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影(CTPA)Qanadli血栓负荷评分系统研究COVID-19合并肺栓塞患者临床严重程度与细胞因子风暴的相关性。
Cureus. 2023 May 20;15(5):e39263. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39263. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Detection and severity quantification of pulmonary embolism with 3D CT data using an automated deep learning-based artificial solution.使用基于深度学习的自动化人工解决方案对3D CT数据进行肺栓塞的检测和严重程度量化。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2024 Mar;105(3):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
8
nnU-Net-based deep-learning for pulmonary embolism: detection, clot volume quantification, and severity correlation in the RSPECT dataset.基于 nnU-Net 的深度学习在肺动脉栓塞中的应用:在 RSPECT 数据集上的检测、血栓体积量化和严重程度相关性。
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Aug;177:111592. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111592. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
9
Prediction of short-term adverse clinical outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism using conventional machine learning and deep Learning based on CTPA images.基于CTPA图像,使用传统机器学习和深度学习预测急性肺栓塞的短期不良临床结局。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Feb;58(2):331-339. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-03044-4. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
10
Diagnostic implications of computed tomography pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary embolism.计算机断层扫描肺动脉造影对肺栓塞患者的诊断意义。
Ann Thorac Med. 2016 Oct-Dec;11(4):269-276. doi: 10.4103/1817-1737.191868.

本文引用的文献

1
Deep learning empowered volume delineation of whole-body organs-at-risk for accelerated radiotherapy.深度学习赋能全身危器官加速放疗的体积勾画。
Nat Commun. 2022 Nov 2;13(1):6566. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34257-x.
2
Clot burden of acute pulmonary thromboembolism: comparison of two deep learning algorithms, Qanadli score, and Mastora score.急性肺血栓栓塞症的血栓负荷:两种深度学习算法、Qanadli评分和Mastora评分的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Jan;12(1):66-79. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-140.
3
CT Angiography Clot Burden Score from Data Mining of Structured Reports for Pulmonary Embolism.
CT 血管造影血栓负担评分来自肺栓塞结构化报告的数据挖掘。
Radiology. 2022 Jan;302(1):175-184. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021211013. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
4
Preliminary study on artificial intelligence diagnosis of pulmonary embolism based on computer in-depth study.基于计算机深度学习的肺栓塞人工智能诊断初步研究
Ann Transl Med. 2021 May;9(10):838. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-975.
5
Automated calculation of the right ventricle to left ventricle ratio on CT for the risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism.CT上右心室与左心室比值的自动计算用于急性肺栓塞患者的风险分层
Eur Radiol. 2021 Aug;31(8):6013-6020. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07605-y. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
6
Automated detection of pulmonary embolism in CT pulmonary angiograms using an AI-powered algorithm.使用人工智能算法自动检测 CT 肺动脉造影中的肺栓塞。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6545-6553. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06998-0. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
7
Evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism and clot burden on CTPA with deep learning.基于深度学习的 CTPA 评估急性肺栓塞和栓子负荷。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jun;30(6):3567-3575. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06699-8. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
8
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS).2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)合作制定的急性肺栓塞诊断和管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 21;41(4):543-603. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz405.
9
Relationship between clot burden in pulmonary computed tomography angiography and different parameters of right cardiac dysfunction in acute pulmonary embolism.急性肺栓塞患者肺部计算机断层扫描血管造影中的血栓负荷与右心功能不全不同参数之间的关系
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2020;31(1):21-24. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2019-041. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
10
Risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism based on the clot volume and right ventricular dysfunction on CT pulmonary angiography.基于CT肺血管造影的血栓体积和右心室功能障碍对急性肺栓塞进行风险分层。
Clin Respir J. 2019 Nov;13(11):674-682. doi: 10.1111/crj.13064. Epub 2019 Sep 4.