• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健患者出行产生的碳排放。

Carbon Emissions From Patient Travel for Health Care.

作者信息

Zurl Hanna, Qian Zhiyu, Stelzl Daniel R, Dagnino Filippo, Korn Stephan M, Labban Muhieddine, Lipsitz Stuart R, Leitsmann Marianne, Ahyai Sascha, Ellimoottil Chad, Loeb Stacy, Iyer Hari S, Trinh Quoc-Dien, Cole Alexander P

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Department of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252513. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2513.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2513
PMID:40163116
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11959441/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The US health care sector accounts for about 8.5% of national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Reliable estimates of emissions associated with health care-related travel are essential for informing policy changes.

OBJECTIVE

To generate a comprehensive national estimate of carbon emissions due to patient health care-related travel in the US.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study used data from the 2022 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS), conducted from January 2022 to January 2023. Participants were selected using an address-based sample from the US Postal Service Delivery Sequence File. Participating households reported all trips taken within 24 hours by all household members aged 5 years or older. Approximate emissions per mile were obtained from typical vehicle emissions data provided by US government institutions. Data were analyzed between March 11 and May 29, 2024.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Estimated annual CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emissions from patient health care-related travel per year, per patient, per trip, and per mile. A survey-weighted λ regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with higher CO2e emissions per trip. An alternative scenario analysis estimated reductions if 30% or 50% of private vehicle users switched to electric vehicles.

RESULTS

The sample included 16 997 participants with a weighted total of 3 506 325 536 US health care trips. Of these trips, 52.0% were reported by female travelers, 80.1% were made in urban areas, and 19.9% were made in rural areas. These trips accounted for 84 057 963 340 miles, resulting in weighted annual estimated emissions of 35.7 megatons (Mt) (95% CI, 27.5-43.9 Mt) CO2e. Each mile traveled generated an estimated 424 g (95% CI, 418-428 g) CO2e. Emissions per trip were higher (exponentiated coefficient [exp(β)], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.51-2.86; P < .001) for rural patients compared with urban patients. However, 69.3% of emissions were attributable to urban patients and 30.7% to rural patients. Patients with annual median household incomes of $50 000 to $99 999 generated higher trip emissions (exp[β], 1.92; 95% CI, 1.09-2.76; P = .003) compared with those with incomes of $25 000 or less. A 30% shift to electric vehicles was estimated to reduce health care-related carbon emissions to 27.6 Mt (95% CI, 20.7-34.6 Mt) CO2e, and a 50% shift was estimated to lower emissions to 22.3 Mt (95% CI, 16.0-28.6 Mt) CO2e.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study estimated that annual patient health care-related travel in the US generated 35.7 Mt CO2e, which accounts for a small but important proportion of total health care-related emissions in the US. These findings are essential for informing health care policy decisions and suggest that strategies such as telehealth and the adoption of electric vehicles may contribute to a small but significant reduction in health care-related GHG emissions.

摘要

重要性

美国医疗保健部门约占全国温室气体(GHG)排放量的8.5%。准确估算与医疗保健相关出行的排放量对于指导政策变化至关重要。

目的

对美国患者因医疗保健相关出行产生的碳排放进行全面的全国性估算。

设计、背景和参与者:这项横断面研究使用了2022年1月至2023年1月进行的2022年全国家庭出行调查(NHTS)的数据。参与者是从美国邮政服务投递顺序文件中基于地址的样本中选取的。参与家庭报告了所有5岁及以上家庭成员在24小时内进行的所有出行。每英里的近似排放量来自美国政府机构提供的典型车辆排放数据。数据于2024年3月11日至5月29日进行分析。

主要结果和指标

估算每年、每位患者、每次出行以及每英里因患者医疗保健相关出行产生的二氧化碳当量(CO2e)排放量。使用调查加权λ回归分析来确定与每次出行较高CO2e排放量相关的因素。一项替代情景分析估计了如果30%或50%的私家车使用者改用电动汽车,排放量的减少情况。

结果

样本包括16997名参与者,加权后的美国医疗保健出行总数为3506325536次。在这些出行中,52.0%由女性出行者报告,80.1%在城市地区进行,19.9%在农村地区进行。这些出行共计84057963340英里,导致加权年度估计排放量为35.7兆吨(Mt)(95%置信区间,27.5 - 43.9 Mt)CO2e。每行驶一英里估计产生424克(95%置信区间,418 - 428克)CO2e。与城市患者相比,农村患者每次出行的排放量更高(指数系数[exp(β)],2.19;95%置信区间,1.51 - 2.86;P <.001)。然而,69.3%的排放量归因于城市患者,30.7%归因于农村患者。家庭年收入中位数为50000美元至99999美元的患者与收入为25000美元或以下的患者相比,每次出行产生的排放量更高(exp[β],1.92;95%置信区间,1.09 - 2.76;P = 0.003)。估计30%改用电动汽车将使医疗保健相关碳排放降至27.6 Mt(95%置信区间:20.7 - 34.6 Mt)CO2e,50%改用电动汽车估计将排放量降至22.3 Mt(95%置信区间:16.0 - 28.6 Mt)CO2e。

结论与意义

这项横断面研究估计,美国每年患者因医疗保健相关出行产生35.7 Mt CO2e,这在美国医疗保健相关总排放量中占比虽小但很重要。这些发现对于为医疗保健政策决策提供信息至关重要,并表明远程医疗和采用电动汽车等策略可能有助于小幅但显著减少医疗保健相关的温室气体排放。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bbb/11959441/29cf82471e49/jamanetwopen-e252513-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bbb/11959441/29cf82471e49/jamanetwopen-e252513-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bbb/11959441/29cf82471e49/jamanetwopen-e252513-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Carbon Emissions From Patient Travel for Health Care.医疗保健患者出行产生的碳排放。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252513. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2513.
2
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Annual Meeting All-in-person Attendance Results in Immense Carbon Expenditure.美国矫形足踝外科学会年会全员现场参会导致巨大碳支出。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Dec 1;481(12):2469-2480. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002764. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Increasing Trends of Pediatric Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fractures in the United States from 2004 to 2023: A 20-year National Injury Review Depicting Shifts in Mechanisms of Injury.2004年至2023年美国儿童胸腰椎骨折的增长趋势:一项为期20年的全国性损伤回顾,描绘损伤机制的变化
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 25. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003421.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
9
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Geographic variability in contemporary utilization of PET imaging for prostate cancer: a medicare claims cohort study.当代前列腺癌PET成像应用的地理差异:一项医疗保险索赔队列研究
Cancer Imaging. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00898-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Urology on a changing planet: links between climate change and urological disease.变化中的星球上的泌尿学:气候变化与泌尿系统疾病之间的联系。
Nat Rev Urol. 2025 Apr;22(4):208-222. doi: 10.1038/s41585-024-00979-4. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
2
Climate Change, Extreme Heat, and Health.气候变化、酷热与健康。
N Engl J Med. 2024 May 16;390(19):1793-1801. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2210769.
3
Introduction to JAMA Climate Change and Health Series.
JAMA. 2024 Feb 6;331(5):436-437. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.25878.
4
The Impact of Telemedicine in Reducing the Carbon Footprint in Health Care: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of 68 Million Clinical Consultations.远程医疗对减少医疗保健碳足迹的影响:对 6800 万次临床咨询的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Nov;9(6):873-887. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.11.013. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
5
The 2023 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for a health-centred response in a world facing irreversible harms.柳叶刀倒计时 2023 年健康与气候变化报告:在世界面临不可逆转损害的情况下,以健康为中心应对的紧迫性。
Lancet. 2023 Dec 16;402(10419):2346-2394. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01859-7. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
6
Disparities in Travel-Related Barriers to Accessing Health Care From the 2017 National Household Travel Survey.2017 年美国家庭旅行调查:旅行相关障碍导致获得医疗保健服务的机会不平等。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2325291. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.25291.
7
The Plant-based Prescription: How Dietary Change Can Improve Both Urological and Planetary Health.植物性饮食处方:饮食改变如何改善泌尿健康和地球健康
Eur Urol. 2023 Oct;84(4):357-358. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.020. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
8
Climate Change and Cancer.气候变化与癌症。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Jul 5;32(7):869-875. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1234.
9
Greenhouse Gas Emission Savings in Relation to Telemedicine and Associated Patient Benefits: A Systematic Review.远程医疗的温室气体减排及其相关患者益处:一项系统评价
Telemed J E Health. 2022 Apr 20. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0047.
10
The environmental impacts of telemedicine in place of face-to-face patient care: a systematic review.远程医疗取代面对面患者护理的环境影响:一项系统综述。
Future Healthc J. 2022 Mar;9(1):28-33. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0148.