Roithmeier Maximilian, Geck Simon, Bühner Markus, Wehr Sophia, Weigel Lucia, Priller Josef, Davis John M, Leucht Stefan
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802, Munich, Germany.
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Mar 31;11(1):51. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00600-6.
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is widely used to assess schizophrenia symptoms. Initially designed with three subscales, Marder et al.´s 5-factor-Model (M5M) first proposed in 1997 has been frequently used in treatment trials, but it has never been systematically reviewed for its measurement properties. We utilized the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analytical procedures to assess the psychometric properties of the M5M-PANSS. COSMIN comprises several steps: literature search, risk-of-bias assessments, assessing the updated criteria for good measurement properties, feasibility aspects and grading the quality of the evidence. We further assessed the goodness of fit of other PANSS factor models. We included 95 publications. The M5M-PANSS showed good construct validity, but "insufficient" structural validity. Evidence of other COSMIN domains is largely lacking. Among the multiple (73) factor solutions examined with confirmatory methods, several other 5-factor solutions had better model fit. According to COSMIN rules the M5M should not be recommended for use. Other five-factor models such as the one proposed by Wallwork et al. warrant further evaluation. Nevertheless, the factor composition of the M5M and these other models was relatively similar, so previously published results should not be disregarded.
阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)被广泛用于评估精神分裂症症状。最初设计为三个分量表,1997年首次提出的马德等人的五因素模型(M5M)在治疗试验中经常被使用,但从未对其测量特性进行过系统评价。我们利用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析程序,以评估M5M-PANSS的心理测量特性。COSMIN包括几个步骤:文献检索、偏倚风险评估、评估良好测量特性的更新标准、可行性方面以及对证据质量进行分级。我们进一步评估了其他PANSS因子模型的拟合优度。我们纳入了95篇出版物。M5M-PANSS显示出良好的结构效度,但结构效度“不足”。在很大程度上缺乏其他COSMIN领域的证据。在用验证性方法检验的多个(73个)因子解中,其他几个五因素解具有更好的模型拟合。根据COSMIN规则,不建议使用M5M。其他五因素模型,如沃尔克等人提出的模型,值得进一步评估。然而,M5M和这些其他模型的因子组成相对相似,因此不应忽视先前发表的结果。