Khankeh Hamidreza, Shirozhan Shima, Dirnagl Ulrich
QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Berlin, Germany. Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, Social Health Research Institute, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Nursing, Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, Social Health Research Institute, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70231. doi: 10.1111/hex.70231.
Patient and public involvement in the research process, despite its novelty and importance in enhancing the quality of studies, still has many unknown dimensions that need to be discovered and explained through qualitative research. Conducting qualitative research to understand experiences in newly emerging topics is challenging and can pose significant difficulties for researchers.
Development of a directed qualitative content analysis study protocol to identify challenges and facilitators to patient and public involvement in stroke research.
Study protocol of qualitative content analysis.
This study protocol outlines the step-by-step design for a directed qualitative content analysis. The study will use a directed approach, following the methodology proposed by Hsieh and Shannon (2005). Participants will be selected based on their experience or knowledge of involvement in the research process, including stakeholders such as researchers, people who are affected by stroke, caregivers, and healthcare providers in stroke research. Participants will be purposefully chosen for their willingness and ability to contribute. Data will be gathered through semi-structured in-depth interviews. The quality of the study will be ensured by applying the criteria established by Lincoln and Guba.
This study protocol offers a comprehensive guide for conducting directed qualitative content analysis, outlining the research process step-by-step to aid researchers using similar methodologies. It addresses common language-related challenges and suggests solutions. The protocol emphasizes maintaining high research standards through specific criteria and provides a detailed discussion of ethical considerations. The authors advocate for publishing qualitative research protocols before implementation to improve research quality, foster ethical and integrated practices, and support novice researchers.
Stakeholder involvement was crucial in developing the interview guide. Feedback was gathered from six experts: three researchers (quantitative and qualitative fields), one stroke rehabilitation specialist, and two Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) experts. Their insights guided the research team in determining research areas, proposing participant recruitment strategies, addressing language barriers, and ensuring necessary details were provided for the study protocol.
患者和公众参与研究过程,尽管在提高研究质量方面具有新颖性和重要性,但仍有许多未知方面需要通过定性研究来发现和解释。针对新出现的主题开展定性研究以了解相关经历具有挑战性,可能给研究人员带来重大困难。
制定一项定向定性内容分析研究方案,以确定患者和公众参与中风研究的挑战和促进因素。
定性内容分析研究方案。
本研究方案概述了定向定性内容分析的逐步设计。该研究将采用定向方法,遵循谢和香农(2005年)提出的方法。将根据参与者在研究过程中的参与经验或知识进行选择,包括研究人员、中风患者、护理人员以及中风研究领域的医疗保健提供者等利益相关者。将有目的地选择愿意且有能力做出贡献的参与者。数据将通过半结构化深度访谈收集。将应用林肯和古巴确立的标准确保研究质量。
本研究方案为进行定向定性内容分析提供了全面指南,逐步概述了研究过程,以帮助使用类似方法的研究人员。它解决了与语言相关的常见挑战并提出了解决方案。该方案强调通过特定标准维持高研究标准,并对伦理考量进行了详细讨论。作者主张在实施前发表定性研究方案,以提高研究质量、促进符合伦理和综合的实践,并支持新手研究人员。
利益相关者的参与对制定访谈指南至关重要。从六位专家收集了反馈意见:三位研究人员(定量和定性领域)、一位中风康复专家以及两位患者和公众参与(PPI)专家。他们的见解指导研究团队确定研究领域、提出参与者招募策略、解决语言障碍,并确保为研究方案提供必要细节。