Ponte Sofia Bizarro, Oliveira Joana, Rei Andreia, Salgueiro Paulo
Department of Gastroenterology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 3;32(2):95-108. doi: 10.1159/000540702. eCollection 2025 Apr.
The incidence of hemorrhoidal disease (HD) in cirrhotic patients is similar to that of general population, varying between 21% and 79%. Managing this clinical condition in these patients is challenging, due to the need to differentiate between bleeding originating from hemorrhoids or anorectal varices, and the unique hemostatic balance of each patient, which can lead to a decompensation of liver function and subsequently increase the anesthetic risk. To date, there are no systematic reviews specifically addressing this topic.
This was a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were retrieved from three electronic databases. Efficacy (symptomatic improvement, patient satisfaction, quality of life improvement, disease recurrence/need for surgery and/or hemorrhoidal prolapse reduction in anoscopy) and safety (reported adverse events) outcomes were evaluated. Data from each study were initially described individually, followed by a comparative analysis for procedures applied in multiple studies.
Six studies were included - 1 randomized clinical trial (RCT), 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 retrospective cohort study, and 2 case series. The considered techniques encompassed rubber band ligation (RBL), injection sclerotherapy (IS) using 3 agents - aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA), ethanolamine oleate 5% (EAO), or N-butyl-cyanoacrylate, hemorrhoidopexy, and emborrhoid technique. RBL showed great symptomatic improvement and patient satisfaction in 63% and 73% of patients, respectively, and in 90% was associated with one-grade prolapse reduction after only one session. The most frequently reported adverse events included pain (16%) and ulceration/fissure (1-17%). Concerning IS, symptomatic improvement was observed in all patients. Recurrence rates varied with the agent used (EAO: 13% at 12 months; N-butyl-cyanoacrylate: 40% at 12 months; ALTA: 18% at 5 years), and 86.7% of patients exhibited more than one-grade reduction after the initial session. The most frequent adverse event was pain (EAO: 63%; N-butyl-cyanoacrylate: 60%). Stapled hemorrhoidopexy resulted in symptomatic improvement in all patients, although associated with a recurrence rate of 25% within 4 months. With an emborrhoid technique, 80% of the patients showed clinical improvement at a 3-month follow-up, without significant adverse events, at the cost of a 40% recurrence rate.
All the treatment methods assessed in the included studies appear to be effective and safe in cirrhotic patients. This assumption challenges previous concerns regarding significant bleeding after office-based procedures like RBL in this population. Future research should prioritize RCT to thoroughly assess the management of HD in these patients, particularly addressing polidocanol foam sclerotherapy, a minimally invasive technique that has previously been shown to be more effective than RBL in the general population and in patients with bleeding disorders.
肝硬化患者痔病(HD)的发病率与普通人群相似,在21%至79%之间。由于需要区分出血是源于痔疮还是肛门直肠静脉曲张,以及每个患者独特的止血平衡,这可能导致肝功能失代偿并随后增加麻醉风险,因此在这些患者中管理这种临床状况具有挑战性。迄今为止,尚无专门针对该主题的系统评价。
这是一项遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南的系统评价。从三个电子数据库中检索研究。评估疗效(症状改善、患者满意度、生活质量改善、疾病复发/手术需求和/或肛门镜检查中痔疮脱垂减轻)和安全性(报告的不良事件)结果。每项研究的数据最初单独描述,然后对多项研究中应用的程序进行比较分析。
纳入六项研究——1项随机临床试验(RCT)、2项前瞻性队列研究、1项回顾性队列研究和2个病例系列。所考虑的技术包括橡皮圈套扎术(RBL)、使用三种药物的注射硬化疗法(IS)——硫酸铝钾和鞣酸(ALTA)、5%油酸乙醇胺(EAO)或氰基丙烯酸正丁酯、痔固定术和栓塞痔技术。RBL分别使63%和73%的患者症状得到显著改善和患者满意度提高,并且90%的患者在仅一次治疗后与一度脱垂减轻相关。最常报告的不良事件包括疼痛(16%)和溃疡/肛裂(1%至17%)。关于IS,所有患者均观察到症状改善。复发率因所用药物而异(EAO:12个月时为13%;氰基丙烯酸正丁酯:12个月时为40%;ALTA:5年时为18%),并且86.7%的患者在初次治疗后脱垂减轻超过一度。最常见的不良事件是疼痛(EAO:63%;氰基丙烯酸正丁酯:60%)。吻合器痔固定术使所有患者症状得到改善,尽管4个月内复发率为25%。采用栓塞痔技术,80%的患者在3个月随访时临床症状改善,无明显不良事件,但复发率为40%。
纳入研究中评估的所有治疗方法在肝硬化患者中似乎都是有效且安全的。这一假设挑战了此前关于在该人群中进行如RBL等门诊手术会导致大量出血的担忧。未来的研究应优先进行RCT,以全面评估这些患者中HD的管理,特别是针对聚多卡醇泡沫硬化疗法,这是一种微创技术,此前已证明在普通人群和出血性疾病患者中比RBL更有效。