• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期癌症患者自主性偏好指数中文版:基于认知访谈的文化调适研究

The Chinese version of the autonomy preference index for advanced cancer patients: a study on cultural adaptation based on cognitive interview.

作者信息

Yan Chao, Li Yonghong, Ai Ji, Yang Shenghuan

机构信息

Nursing Department, Guizhou Aerospace Hospital, Guizhou Zunyi, 563000, China.

Nursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Guizhou Zunyi, Guizhou, 563000, China.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 2;13(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02391-y.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-025-02391-y
PMID:40176155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11967037/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The global cancer burden is becoming increasingly severe. In the context of patient-centred medicine, respecting patients' autonomy and preferences is of paramount importance. However, there is currently a lack of scientific tools in China to measure the autonomous preferences of advanced cancer patients. We aim to optimise assessment tools for patients' autonomous preferences and validate their effectiveness, thereby filling a gap in related research, in hopes of improving the quality of medical care in China.

OBJECTIVES

① To assess the semantic clarity of entries of the Chinese Autonomy Preference Index (API) and determine whether patients can accurately comprehend their content. ② To validate the application effect of cognitive interviews in the translation of the scale into the Chinese culture and context.

METHODS

In March and April 2023, we selected 17 advanced cancer patients by convenience sampling in Zunyi, Guizhou, China, to participate in this study. We assessed their understanding of each item in the Chinese API scale through cognitive interviews and made the corresponding revisions to the scale items based on the interview results.

RESULTS

The respondents' understanding of various API entries after translation and adaptation was assessed. Based on the interview results, ambiguous entries were revised to create a refined Chinese version of the API. Ultimately, the API comprises two dimensions and 23 entries. The results of the first round of interviews revealed doubts or ambiguities in the semantic expression and understanding of 5 items, which were then revised following discussions by the research team. The second round of interviews confirmed that the interviewees could correctly understand the content of the entries without further modifications.

CONCLUSIONS

① Cognitive interviews can address discrepancies in the understanding of scale items among the target population and mitigate measurement errors stemming from item content ambiguity. ② Targeted questionnaire revisions have improved the accuracy, reliability, and applicability of the Chinese version of the API questionnaire. The Chinese version of the Autonomy-Preference-Index offers clinical healthcare professionals an effective measurement tool to assess the autonomous preferences of advanced cancer patients.

摘要

背景

全球癌症负担日益严峻。在以患者为中心的医疗背景下,尊重患者的自主性和偏好至关重要。然而,目前中国缺乏科学工具来衡量晚期癌症患者的自主偏好。我们旨在优化患者自主偏好的评估工具并验证其有效性,从而填补相关研究空白,以期提高中国的医疗质量。

目的

①评估中文版自主性偏好指数(API)条目的语义清晰度,确定患者是否能准确理解其内容。②验证认知访谈在将该量表翻译至中国文化和背景中的应用效果。

方法

2023年3月和4月,我们在中国贵州遵义通过便利抽样选取了17名晚期癌症患者参与本研究。我们通过认知访谈评估他们对中文版API量表各条目的理解,并根据访谈结果对量表条目进行相应修订。

结果

评估了受访者对翻译和改编后的各种API条目的理解。根据访谈结果,对含糊不清的条目进行修订,创建了一个精简的中文版API。最终,API包括两个维度和23个条目。第一轮访谈结果显示,有5个条目的语义表达和理解存在疑问或含糊之处,研究团队经讨论后对其进行了修订。第二轮访谈证实,受访者能够正确理解条目的内容,无需进一步修改。

结论

①认知访谈可以解决目标人群对量表条目的理解差异问题,并减少因条目内容含糊不清而产生的测量误差。②有针对性的问卷修订提高了中文版API问卷的准确性、可靠性和适用性。中文版自主性偏好指数为临床医护人员提供了一种有效的测量工具,用于评估晚期癌症患者的自主偏好。

相似文献

1
The Chinese version of the autonomy preference index for advanced cancer patients: a study on cultural adaptation based on cognitive interview.晚期癌症患者自主性偏好指数中文版:基于认知访谈的文化调适研究
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 2;13(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02391-y.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
A qualitative interview study exploring patients' views and experiences of treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa in the UK.一项定性访谈研究,探讨英国化脓性汗腺炎患者对治疗的看法和经历。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):85-92. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf046.
8
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
9
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
10
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental Adjustment, Functional Status, and Depression in Advanced Cancer Patients.晚期癌症患者的心理调整、功能状态和抑郁。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 9;20(4):3015. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043015.
2
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
3
DNA Damage Response in Cancer Therapy and Resistance: Challenges and Opportunities.癌症治疗与耐药中的 DNA 损伤反应:挑战与机遇。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 24;23(23):14672. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314672.
4
Molecular approaches in cancer.癌症的分子方法。
Clin Chim Acta. 2022 Dec 1;537:60-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.09.027. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
5
Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022.2022 年癌症治疗和生存统计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Sep;72(5):409-436. doi: 10.3322/caac.21731. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
6
Perceived Dignity of Advanced Cancer Patients and Its Relationship to Sociodemographic, Clinical, and Psychological Factors.晚期癌症患者的尊严感及其与社会人口学、临床和心理因素的关系。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:855704. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.855704. eCollection 2022.
7
The global burden of adolescent and young adult cancer in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.2019年青少年和青年癌症的全球负担:全球疾病负担研究2019的系统分析
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):27-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00581-7. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
8
Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗或纳武利尤单抗对比伊匹单抗治疗晚期黑色素瘤患者的长期结局。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;40(2):127-137. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02229. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
9
Ambiguity and conflict: Dissecting uncertainty in decision-making.歧义与冲突:剖析决策中的不确定性。
Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb;136(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/bne0000489. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
10
Cancer immunotherapies revisited: state of the art of conventional treatments and next-generation nanomedicines.癌症免疫疗法再探讨:传统治疗方法的最新进展和下一代纳米药物。
Cancer Gene Ther. 2021 Sep;28(9):935-946. doi: 10.1038/s41417-021-00333-5. Epub 2021 Apr 9.