Zinellu Angelo, Mangoni Arduino A
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Front Immunol. 2025 Mar 19;16:1479904. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1479904. eCollection 2025.
There is an ongoing search for novel biomarkers to enhance diagnosing and monitoring patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the potential role of the soluble cluster of differentiation 40 (sCD40) and sCD40 ligand (sCD40L), involved in humoral and cellular immune response, as candidate biomarkers of RDs. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to 30 June 2024 for studies investigating circulating sCD40 and sCD40L concentrations in RD patients and healthy controls. We assessed the risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for analytical studies and the certainty of evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group system. Compared to controls, RD patients had significantly higher sCD40L (31 studies; standard mean difference, SMD=0.87, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.13, p<0.001; low certainty of evidence) and sCD40 (five studies; SMD=1.32, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.18, p=0.003; very low certainty of evidence) concentrations. In meta-regression and subgroup analysis, the effect size of the between-group differences in sCD40L was significantly associated with sample size, mean RD duration, specific RD, biological matrix assessed, and analytical method used. By contrast, there were no associations with age, sex, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or glucocorticoids, or geographical location. There were no significant differences in sCD40L concentrations between RD patients with and without active disease (eight studies; SMD=0.12, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.33, p=0.26; very low certainty). By contrast, sCD40 concentrations were significantly higher in RD patients with active disease (three studies; SMD=0.36, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.84, p=0.013; very low certainty). Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggests the potential role of sCD40 and sCD40L as candidate biomarkers to detect the presence of RDs (sCD40 and sCD40L) and monitor disease activity (sCD40). Large, appropriately designed prospective studies in a wide range of RDs are warranted to investigate whether measuring sCD40 and sCD40L can significantly improve the performance of currently available diagnostic criteria and serological biomarkers. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024577430).
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024577430, identifier PROSPERO CRD42024577430.
目前正在寻找新型生物标志物,以加强对风湿性疾病(RD)患者的诊断和监测。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究参与体液免疫和细胞免疫反应的可溶性分化簇40(sCD40)和sCD40配体(sCD40L)作为RD候选生物标志物的潜在作用。我们检索了PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus数据库,从建库至2024年6月30日,查找研究RD患者和健康对照中循环sCD40和sCD40L浓度的研究。我们使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所分析性研究批判性评价清单评估偏倚风险,并使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价工作组系统评估证据的确定性。与对照组相比,RD患者的sCD40L浓度显著更高(31项研究;标准化均数差,SMD = 0.87,95%可信区间0.60至1.13,p < 0.001;证据确定性低),sCD40浓度也显著更高(5项研究;SMD = 1.32,95%可信区间0.45至2.18,p = 0.003;证据确定性极低)。在荟萃回归和亚组分析中,sCD40L组间差异的效应大小与样本量、平均RD病程、特定RD、评估的生物基质和使用的分析方法显著相关。相比之下,与年龄、性别、C反应蛋白、红细胞沉降率、使用改善病情抗风湿药物或糖皮质激素或地理位置无关。有活动性疾病和无活动性疾病的RD患者之间sCD40L浓度无显著差异(8项研究;SMD = 0.12,95%可信区间 -0.09至0.33,p = 0.26;证据确定性极低)。相比之下,有活动性疾病的RD患者sCD40浓度显著更高(3项研究;SMD = 0.36,95%可信区间0.08至0.84,p = 0.013;证据确定性极低)。我们的系统评价和荟萃分析表明,sCD40和sCD40L作为检测RD存在(sCD40和sCD40L)和监测疾病活动(sCD40)的候选生物标志物具有潜在作用。有必要开展大量设计合理的针对广泛RD的前瞻性研究,以调查测量sCD40和sCD40L是否能显著改善现有诊断标准和血清学生物标志物的性能。(国际前瞻性系统评价注册编号:CRD42024577430)