• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用基于时间图的卷积神经网络(TG-CNNs)提前1至5年对髋关节和膝关节置换进行初级保健预测。

Primary care prediction of hip and knee replacement 1-5 years in advance using Temporal Graph-based Convolutional Neural Networks (TG-CNNs).

作者信息

Hancox Zoe, Kingsbury Sarah R, Conaghan Philip G, Clegg Andrew, Relton Samuel D

机构信息

School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Aug 1;64(8):4589-4598. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf185.

DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keaf185
PMID:40178991
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12316357/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to predict the risk of requiring a primary hip or knee replacement 1 and 5 years in advance, using clinical codes.

METHODS

Primary care clinical codes, sourced from ResearchOne Electronic Health Records between 1999 and 2014, were used to represent patient pathways prior to hip or knee replacement. Patient records were used to train and test models for hip or knee replacement, 1 and 5 years in advance. Temporal graphs were constructed from clinical codes to predict hip and knee replacement risk, where nodes are clinical codes, and edges are the time between primary care visits. Hip and knee replacement cases were matched to controls by age, sex and Index of Multiple Deprivation. The model was validated on unseen data, with performance measured using area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC), calibration and area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC), recalibrating for class imbalance.

RESULTS

For knee replacement prediction, AUROC was 0.915 (95% CI 0.914, 0.916) (1 year) and 0.955 (95% CI 0.954, 0.956) (5 years) with AUPRCs of 0.353 (95% CI 0.302, 0.403) and 0.442 (95% CI 0.382, 0.503), respectively. For hip replacement prediction, AUROC was 0.919 (95% CI 0.918, 0.920) (1 year) and 0.967 (95% CI 0.966, 0.968) (5 years), with AUPRCs of 0.409 (95% CI 0.366, 0.451) and 0.879 (95% CI 0.833, 0.924), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Hip and knee replacement risk can be predicted up to 5 years in advance, with a temporal-graph based artificial intelligence model achieving the best performance. This may be used for planning preventative treatment or triaging patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在利用临床编码提前1年和5年预测初次髋关节或膝关节置换的风险。

方法

从1999年至2014年的ResearchOne电子健康记录中获取的初级保健临床编码,用于代表髋关节或膝关节置换术前的患者诊疗路径。利用患者记录对提前1年和5年的髋关节或膝关节置换模型进行训练和测试。根据临床编码构建时间图以预测髋关节和膝关节置换风险,其中节点为临床编码,边为初级保健就诊之间的时间。髋关节和膝关节置换病例按年龄、性别和多重剥夺指数与对照组进行匹配。该模型在未见过的数据上进行验证,使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、校准和精确召回率曲线下面积(AUPRC)来衡量性能,并针对类别不平衡进行重新校准。

结果

对于膝关节置换预测,1年时AUROC为0.915(95%CI 0.914,0.916),5年时为0.955(95%CI 0.954,0.956),AUPRC分别为0.353(95%CI 0.302,0.403)和0.442(95%CI 0.382,0.503)。对于髋关节置换预测,1年时AUROC为0.919(95%CI 0.918,0.920),5年时为0.967(95%CI 0.966,0.968),AUPRC分别为0.409(95%CI 0.366,0.451)和0.879(95%CI 0.833,0.924)。

结论

基于时间图的人工智能模型能提前5年预测髋关节和膝关节置换风险,且性能最佳。这可用于规划预防性治疗或对患者进行分类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c2/12316357/1d6452edbe59/keaf185f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c2/12316357/6919307b228b/keaf185f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c2/12316357/4e0c59547c95/keaf185f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c2/12316357/6607051e5f47/keaf185f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c2/12316357/769dd40970bb/keaf185f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c2/12316357/1d6452edbe59/keaf185f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c2/12316357/6919307b228b/keaf185f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c2/12316357/4e0c59547c95/keaf185f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c2/12316357/6607051e5f47/keaf185f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c2/12316357/769dd40970bb/keaf185f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c2/12316357/1d6452edbe59/keaf185f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Primary care prediction of hip and knee replacement 1-5 years in advance using Temporal Graph-based Convolutional Neural Networks (TG-CNNs).使用基于时间图的卷积神经网络(TG-CNNs)提前1至5年对髋关节和膝关节置换进行初级保健预测。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Aug 1;64(8):4589-4598. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf185.
2
Do the Revision Rates of Arthroplasty Surgeons Correlate With Postoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.关节置换外科医生的修正率与术后患者报告的结果测量评分相关吗?来自澳大利亚骨科协会全国关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):98-112. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002737. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Development and Validation of a Convolutional Neural Network Model to Predict a Pathologic Fracture in the Proximal Femur Using Abdomen and Pelvis CT Images of Patients With Advanced Cancer.利用晚期癌症患者腹部和骨盆 CT 图像建立卷积神经网络模型预测股骨近端病理性骨折的研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Nov 1;481(11):2247-2256. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002771. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
5
Epidural analgesia for pain relief following hip or knee replacement.髋关节或膝关节置换术后用于缓解疼痛的硬膜外镇痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(3):CD003071. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003071.
6
Machine Learning Did Not Outperform Conventional Competing Risk Modeling to Predict Revision Arthroplasty.在预测翻修关节成形术方面,机器学习的表现并未优于传统的竞争风险模型。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1472-1482. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003018. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
7
Preoperative education for hip or knee replacement.髋关节或膝关节置换术的术前教育
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 13;2014(5):CD003526. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003526.pub3.
8
Comparing the Quality of Primary Care Electronic Health Record Data in Australia and Canada: Case Study in Osteoarthritis.比较澳大利亚和加拿大基层医疗电子健康记录数据的质量:骨关节炎案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 3;27:e69631. doi: 10.2196/69631.
9
Total hip replacement and surface replacement for the treatment of pain and disability resulting from end-stage arthritis of the hip (review of technology appraisal guidance 2 and 44): systematic review and economic evaluation.全髋关节置换术和表面置换术治疗终末期髋关节炎所致疼痛和残疾(技术评估指南2和44综述):系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jan;19(10):1-668, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta19100.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.

本文引用的文献

1
The Harms of Class Imbalance Corrections for Machine Learning Based Prediction Models: A Simulation Study.基于机器学习的预测模型中类别不平衡校正的危害:一项模拟研究
Stat Med. 2025 Feb 10;44(3-4):e10320. doi: 10.1002/sim.10320.
2
Development and external validation of the eFalls tool: a multivariable prediction model for the risk of ED attendance or hospitalisation with a fall or fracture in older adults.eFalls 工具的开发和外部验证:一种用于预测老年人因跌倒或骨折而导致 ED 就诊或住院风险的多变量预测模型。
Age Ageing. 2024 Mar 1;53(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae057.
3
An interpretable knee replacement risk assessment system for osteoarthritis patients.
一种针对骨关节炎患者的可解释性膝关节置换风险评估系统。
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024 Feb 16;6(2):100440. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100440. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
The Impact of Frailty and Deprivation on the Likelihood of Receiving Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty among People with Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.衰弱和贫困对髋膝关节骨关节炎患者接受初次全髋关节和全膝关节置换术可能性的影响。
J Frailty Aging. 2023;12(4):298-304. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2023.36.
5
Mining for equitable health: Assessing the impact of missing data in electronic health records.挖掘公平健康:评估电子健康记录中缺失数据的影响。
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Mar;139:104269. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104269. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
6
Targeted validation: validating clinical prediction models in their intended population and setting.靶向验证:在目标人群和环境中验证临床预测模型。
Diagn Progn Res. 2022 Dec 22;6(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41512-022-00136-8.
7
Developing and internally validating a prediction model for total knee replacement surgery in patients with osteoarthritis.开发并在内部验证骨关节炎患者全膝关节置换手术的预测模型。
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2022 May 28;4(3):100281. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100281. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
Prediction models for the risk of total knee replacement: development and validation using data from multicentre cohort studies.全膝关节置换风险的预测模型:基于多中心队列研究数据的开发与验证
Lancet Rheumatol. 2022 Feb;4(2):e125-e134. doi: 10.1016/s2665-9913(21)00324-6. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
9
Validation of prediction models in the presence of competing risks: a guide through modern methods.存在竞争风险时预测模型的验证:现代方法指南
BMJ. 2022 May 24;377:e069249. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069249.
10
Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence.基于人工智能的诊断和预后预测模型研究报告指南(TRIPOD-AI)和偏倚风险工具(PROBAST-AI)制定方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e048008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048008.