补充营养援助计划与老年人：一项范围综述方案
The supplemental nutrition assistance program and older adults: A scoping review protocol.
作者信息
Soldavini Jessica
机构信息
Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention and Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
出版信息
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 3;20(4):e0321281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321281. eCollection 2025.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this scoping review is to describe the scope of original published research on SNAP and older adults.
INTRODUCTION
Food insecurity among older adults in the United States is a significant public health issue. Participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the largest nutrition assistance program in the United States, by older adults is lower than the overall participation rate.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
This scoping review will include original research focused on older adults (aged 60 years and older) and participation in SNAP. Studies should address at least one of the following: examining one or more outcomes related to participation in SNAP, facilitators or barriers to SNAP participation, and/or evaluation of a program, policy or other strategy for influencing SNAP participation.
METHODS
Databases to be searched include PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and ProQuest. Sciwheel will be used for deduplicating references that will be imported into Covidence for screening and extracting data. Two independent reviewers will screen titles/abstracts followed by full-text articles to assess whether articles meet inclusion criteria and then complete a data extraction template for each included article. A third reviewer will resolve any discrepancies. The findings will be summarized and presented in tables and narrative form.
目的
本范围综述的目的是描述已发表的关于补充营养援助计划（SNAP）与老年人的原创研究的范围。
引言
美国老年人的粮食不安全是一个重大的公共卫生问题。老年人参与美国最大的营养援助计划——补充营养援助计划（SNAP）的比例低于总体参与率。
纳入标准
本范围综述将包括专注于老年人（60岁及以上）和参与SNAP的原创研究。研究应至少涉及以下一项内容：研究与参与SNAP相关的一个或多个结果、SNAP参与的促进因素或障碍，和/或对影响SNAP参与的项目、政策或其他策略的评估。
方法
将检索的数据库包括PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL和ProQuest。Sciwheel将用于去除重复的参考文献，这些参考文献将导入Covidence进行筛选和数据提取。两名独立的评审员将筛选标题/摘要，然后筛选全文文章，以评估文章是否符合纳入标准，然后为每篇纳入的文章完成一个数据提取模板。第三名评审员将解决任何分歧。研究结果将以表格和叙述形式进行总结和呈现。
Zotero 插件