• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产麻醉对新生儿脑电图的影响。

Effects of anaesthesia for caesarean section on the computerized EEG of the neonate.

作者信息

Hollmén A I, Eskelinen P, Tolonen U, Arranto J, Sulg I, Jouppila R, Jouppila P

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1985 Mar;2(1):39-51.

PMID:4018040
Abstract

The effects of anaesthetic techniques and drugs on 18 neonates born after elective Caesarean section were studied, employing computerized EEG. Three different groups, epidural, spinal and general anaesthesia, were compared with each other and with a control group after normal vaginal delivery. A new computerized EEG method, Zero Band Power Rate (ZBPR) analysis, was devised for this study and implemented together with conventional spectral EEG estimates of five frequency bands. ZBPR analysis was found to be much more sensitive than conventional spectral analyses for detecting differences between the study groups. Significant differences occurred between the general anaesthesia group and the epidural and control groups and also between the spinal group and the epidural and control groups. No significant difference was seen between the epidural group and the control group. Significant differences were attributed to the clinical use of two drugs: thiopentone in the general anaesthesia group and ephedrine in the spinal group. The effects of these drugs on the neonatal EEG were reflected in decreased ZBPR values, particularly during sleep.

摘要

采用计算机化脑电图技术,研究了麻醉技术和药物对18例择期剖宫产出生新生儿的影响。将硬膜外麻醉、脊髓麻醉和全身麻醉三个不同组相互比较,并与正常阴道分娩后的对照组进行比较。本研究设计了一种新的计算机化脑电图方法——零频段功率率(ZBPR)分析,并与传统的五个频段的脑电图频谱估计方法一起实施。结果发现,ZBPR分析在检测研究组之间的差异方面比传统频谱分析更为敏感。全身麻醉组与硬膜外麻醉组及对照组之间以及脊髓麻醉组与硬膜外麻醉组及对照组之间均出现显著差异。硬膜外麻醉组与对照组之间未见显著差异。显著差异归因于两种药物的临床使用:全身麻醉组中的硫喷妥钠和脊髓麻醉组中的麻黄碱。这些药物对新生儿脑电图的影响表现为ZBPR值降低,尤其是在睡眠期间。

相似文献

1
Effects of anaesthesia for caesarean section on the computerized EEG of the neonate.剖宫产麻醉对新生儿脑电图的影响。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1985 Mar;2(1):39-51.
2
General anaesthesia versus epidural anaesthesia for primary caesarean section--a comparative study.全身麻醉与硬膜外麻醉用于初次剖宫产的比较研究
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1992 Jan;9(1):15-21.
3
Epidural block with ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective caesarean section: maternal cardiovascular parameters, comfort and neonatal well-being.罗哌卡因和布比卡因用于择期剖宫产的硬膜外阻滞:产妇心血管参数、舒适度及新生儿健康状况
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Jan;20(1):7-12. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002649.
4
Neonatal wellbeing after elective caesarean delivery with general, spinal, and epidural anaesthesia.择期剖宫产采用全身麻醉、脊髓麻醉和硬膜外麻醉后的新生儿健康状况。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1993 May;10(3):175-81.
5
An observational study of anaesthesia and surgical time in elective caesarean section: spinal compared with general anaesthesia.择期剖宫产麻醉与手术时间的观察性研究:脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉的比较
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Oct;18(4):352-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
6
A randomized trial comparing low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and conventional epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severe preeclampsia.一项比较低剂量腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉与传统硬膜外麻醉用于重度子痫前期剖宫产的随机试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2005;56(2):155-62.
7
Effect of anaesthetic agents administered to the mothers on transcutaneous bilirubin levels in the neonates.母亲使用的麻醉剂对新生儿经皮胆红素水平的影响。
Acta Paediatr. 2010 Jul;99(7):993-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01761.x. Epub 2010 Apr 26.
8
Anaesthesia mode for caesarean section and mortality in very preterm infants: an epidemiologic study in the EPIPAGE cohort.剖宫产麻醉方式与极早产儿死亡率:EPIPAGE队列中的一项流行病学研究
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009 Apr;18(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.11.005. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
9
Low-dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a comparison of three plain local anesthetics.低剂量腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉用于剖宫产:三种普通局麻药的比较
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2006;57(1):39-43.
10
[Effectiveness of obstetric epidural analgesia. II. Caesarean section].
Reg Anaesth. 1982 Oct;5(4):73-7.