• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经历患者死亡的护理专业人员中功能失调的大流行悲伤模型

Dysfunctional Pandemic Grief Model Among Nursing Professionals Who Experienced Death of Patients.

作者信息

Chung Seockhoon, Bang Young Rong, Shahrier Mohd Ashik, Hong Youjin, Ahn Junseok

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 86 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.

Life Care Center for Cancer Patient, Asan Medical Center Cancer Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Psychiatr Q. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1007/s11126-025-10142-w.

DOI:10.1007/s11126-025-10142-w
PMID:40183872
Abstract

Dysfunctional grief was not addressed adequately during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to develop a dysfunctional pandemic grief model specific to healthcare workers who experienced patient deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted an anonymous online survey among 568 nursing professionals who had experienced a patient's death while working at three tertiary-level hospitals. We further assessed psychological status using the Pandemic Grief Scale (PGS) for Healthcare Workers, Pandemic Grief Risk Factors (PGEF), Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS), Grief Support HealthCare Scale (GSHCS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Stress and Anxiety in Viral Epidemic-9 (SAVE-9). PGS correlated with PGRF, UGRS, GSHCS, PHQ-9, and SAVE-9 (all p < 0.01). Linear regression analysis revealed that PGRF (𝛽=0.44, p < 0.001), UGRS (𝛽=0.24, p < 0.001), GSHCS (𝛽=-0.09, p = 0.004), and PHQ-9 (𝛽=0.23, p < 0.001) expected pandemic dysfunctional grief. Mediation analysis showed that PGRF directly influenced PGS; UGRS and GSHCS positively and negatively mediated the relationship between PGRF and PGS, respectively. The dysfunctional pandemic grief model shows that it is important to address grief risk factors, manage rumination, and provide effective psychological support to healthcare workers.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,功能失调性悲伤未得到充分关注。本研究旨在构建一个针对在新冠疫情期间经历患者死亡的医护人员的功能失调性疫情悲伤模型。我们对568名在三家三级医院工作时经历过患者死亡的护理专业人员进行了匿名在线调查。我们还使用医护人员疫情悲伤量表(PGS)、疫情悲伤风险因素量表(PGEF)、乌得勒支悲伤反刍量表(UGRS)、悲伤支持医护量表(GSHCS)、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)以及病毒流行中的压力与焦虑-9(SAVE-9)进一步评估心理状态。PGS与PGRF、UGRS、GSHCS、PHQ-9和SAVE-9均相关(所有p<0.01)。线性回归分析显示,PGRF(β=0.44,p<0.001)、UGRS(β=0.24,p<0.001)、GSHCS(β=-0.09,p=0.004)和PHQ-9(β=0.23,p<0.001)可预测疫情期间的功能失调性悲伤。中介分析表明,PGRF直接影响PGS;UGRS和GSHCS分别正向和负向介导PGRF与PGS之间的关系。功能失调性疫情悲伤模型表明,关注悲伤风险因素、管理反刍情绪以及为医护人员提供有效的心理支持非常重要。

相似文献

1
Dysfunctional Pandemic Grief Model Among Nursing Professionals Who Experienced Death of Patients.经历患者死亡的护理专业人员中功能失调的大流行悲伤模型
Psychiatr Q. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1007/s11126-025-10142-w.
2
Healing Through Loss: Exploring Nurses' Post-Traumatic Growth After Patient Death.在失去中疗愈:探寻护士在患者死亡后的创伤后成长
Psychiatry Investig. 2025 Jan;22(1):40-46. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0253. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
3
Validation of the Korean version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale and its relationship with COVID-related hypochondriasis among healthcare workers who witnessed patient deaths.乌得勒支悲伤沉思量表韩文版的验证及其与目睹患者死亡的医护人员中与 COVID 相关的疑病症的关系。
Brain Behav. 2023 Oct;13(10):e3203. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3203. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
4
Validation of the Pandemic Grief Risk Factors and Its Relationship With Work-Related Stress and Grief Reaction Among Healthcare Workers Who Witnessed Patient Deaths.验证大流行病悲伤风险因素及其与目睹患者死亡的医护人员工作相关压力和悲伤反应之间的关系。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Mar 25;39(11):e102. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e102.
5
Validation of the healthcare workers' version of the Pandemic Grief Scale among frontline nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea.韩国新冠疫情期间一线护理专业人员中《大流行悲伤量表》医护人员版的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 30;14:1121546. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1121546. eCollection 2023.
6
Validation of the Grief Support in Healthcare Scale among frontline nursing professionals working in COVID-19 inpatient wards in Korea.韩国新冠肺炎住院病房一线护理专业人员中《医疗保健领域悲伤支持量表》的效度验证
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 20;14:1097022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1097022. eCollection 2023.
7
Grief Response of Nursing Professionals Is Associated With Their Depression, Loneliness, Insomnia, and Work-Related Stress While Working in COVID-19 Inpatients Wards.护理专业人员在新冠病毒住院病房工作时的悲伤反应与他们的抑郁、孤独、失眠及工作相关压力有关。
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Apr;20(4):374-381. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0375. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
8
Assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the German version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS).悲伤相关反刍的评估:德国版乌得勒支悲伤反刍量表(UGRS)的验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 9;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1630-1.
9
Measuring dysfunctional grief due to a COVID-19 loss: A Turkish validation study of the Pandemic Grief Scale.测量 COVID-19 相关丧失导致的功能失调性悲伤:大流行悲伤量表的土耳其验证研究。
Death Stud. 2022;46(1):25-33. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2021.1897179. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
10
Rumination in bereaved parents: Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS).丧亲父母的沉思:瑞典版乌得勒支悲伤沉思量表(UGRS)的心理测量评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 19;14(3):e0213152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213152. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Enduring Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Physicians in Pakistan: A Mixed-Methods Study.新冠疫情对巴基斯坦医生心理健康的持久影响:一项混合方法研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;13(16):2009. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162009.

本文引用的文献

1
Healing Through Loss: Exploring Nurses' Post-Traumatic Growth After Patient Death.在失去中疗愈:探寻护士在患者死亡后的创伤后成长
Psychiatry Investig. 2025 Jan;22(1):40-46. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0253. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
Validation of the Pandemic Grief Risk Factors and Its Relationship With Work-Related Stress and Grief Reaction Among Healthcare Workers Who Witnessed Patient Deaths.验证大流行病悲伤风险因素及其与目睹患者死亡的医护人员工作相关压力和悲伤反应之间的关系。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Mar 25;39(11):e102. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e102.
3
Validation of the Korean version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale and its relationship with COVID-related hypochondriasis among healthcare workers who witnessed patient deaths.
乌得勒支悲伤沉思量表韩文版的验证及其与目睹患者死亡的医护人员中与 COVID 相关的疑病症的关系。
Brain Behav. 2023 Oct;13(10):e3203. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3203. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
4
Validation of the Grief Support in Healthcare Scale among frontline nursing professionals working in COVID-19 inpatient wards in Korea.韩国新冠肺炎住院病房一线护理专业人员中《医疗保健领域悲伤支持量表》的效度验证
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 20;14:1097022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1097022. eCollection 2023.
5
Validation of the healthcare workers' version of the Pandemic Grief Scale among frontline nursing professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea.韩国新冠疫情期间一线护理专业人员中《大流行悲伤量表》医护人员版的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 30;14:1121546. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1121546. eCollection 2023.
6
Pandemic grief risk factors and prolonged grief disorder in bereaved young adults during COVID-19.COVID-19 大流行期间,丧亲的年轻成年人的悲伤风险因素和延长悲伤障碍。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Oct;21(5):836-842. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000160.
7
'Doing the best we can': Registered Nurses' experiences and perceptions of patient safety in intensive care during COVID-19.“尽力而为”:新冠肺炎疫情期间重症监护病房注册护士对患者安全的体验和看法。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3371-3384. doi: 10.1111/jan.15419. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
8
A longitudinal study of depression, anxiety, and stress among Indians during COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间印度人抑郁、焦虑和压力的纵向研究。
Psychol Health Med. 2023 Jan;28(1):60-68. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2021.2023751. Epub 2022 Jan 2.
9
Development of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-9 (SAVE-9) Scale for Assessing Work-related Stress and Anxiety in Healthcare Workers in Response to Viral Epidemics.开发用于评估医护人员应对病毒流行时与工作相关的压力和焦虑的压力与病毒流行焦虑量表-9(SAVE-9)。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Dec 6;36(47):e319. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e319.
10
Risk factors for dysfunctional grief and functional impairment for all causes of death during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of meaning.新冠大流行期间,所有死因导致的功能失调性悲伤和功能障碍的风险因素:意义的中介作用。
Death Stud. 2022;46(1):43-52. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2021.1974666. Epub 2021 Sep 11.