• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How to evaluate the quality of the clinical learning environment in health professions education? Protocol of a systematic review.如何评估卫生专业教育中临床学习环境的质量?一项系统评价方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 4;20(4):e0293773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293773. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of interprofessional competence in undergraduate health professions education: protocol for a systematic review of self-report instruments.本科卫生专业教育中的跨专业能力评估:系统评价自我报告工具的方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 12;9(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01394-7.
3
Effects of Interprofessional Education on Readiness for Interprofessional Learning in Rehabilitation Science Students From Professional Health Care Programs: Protocol for a Systematic Review.跨专业教育对专业医疗保健项目康复科学专业学生的跨专业学习准备的影响:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Nov 20;13:e60830. doi: 10.2196/60830.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
6
Characteristics of Student-Led Clinics in the Allied Health Professions: Protocol for a Scoping Review.学生主导的辅助健康专业临床教学诊所的特征:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Nov 27;13:e58084. doi: 10.2196/58084.
7
Exploring the effectiveness of technology-based learning on the educational outcomes of undergraduate healthcare students: an overview of systematic reviews protocol.探索基于技术的学习对本科医疗保健专业学生教育成果的影响:系统评价综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 23;10(11):e041153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041153.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Facilitator development for pre-registration health professions simulation: a scoping review protocol.预注册卫生专业模拟的促进者发展:一项范围综述方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2025 Apr 1;23(4):812-821. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-24-00130. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
10
Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs.同伴教师培训对卫生专业学生的影响:一项正式课程的系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1356-2.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
3
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
4
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
5
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
6
Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis.超越 PICO:用于定性证据综合的 SPIDER 工具。
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43. doi: 10.1177/1049732312452938. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
7
Assessing nursing student perceptions of the clinical learning environment: refinement and testing of the SECEE inventory.评估护理专业学生对临床学习环境的认知:SECEE量表的完善与测试
J Nurs Meas. 2009;17(3):232-46. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.17.3.232.
8
Italian nursing students' perception of their clinical learning environment as measured with the CLEI tool.意大利护理专业学生对临床学习环境的感知,用 CLEI 工具进行测量。
Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Nov;29(8):886-90. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.016. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
9
Clinical learning environments for student nurses: key indices from two studies compared over a 25 year period.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2007 Jul;7(4):238-46. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
10
Hong Kong nursing students' perception of the clinical environment: a questionnaire survey.香港护理专业学生对临床环境的认知:一项问卷调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2005 Aug;42(6):665-672. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.09.019.

如何评估卫生专业教育中临床学习环境的质量?一项系统评价方案。

How to evaluate the quality of the clinical learning environment in health professions education? Protocol of a systematic review.

作者信息

Walter Matthias M, Rogan Slavko, Schurz Alexander P, Zinzen Evert

机构信息

Science and Research, Physio Insight, Haslach im Kinzigtal, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Department Movement and Nutrition for Health and Performance, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 4;20(4):e0293773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293773. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0293773
PMID:40184416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11970635/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Internships can constitute up to one third of the curriculum and during these internships, the foundation for developing specific health professional competencies is formed. The clinical learning environment (CLE) is a critical determinant of the overall quality of internships in health profession education, shaping students' professional competencies and experiences.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to identify and categorize assessment tools available for evaluating the quality of the CLE in health professions education.

METHODS

This in the International Database of Education Systematic Reviews preregistered systematic review [IDESR000098] will consider peer-reviewed articles in English where instruments are developed and validated to illustrate the quality of the CLE in higher education health professions students. The search strategy will encompass multiple electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, ERIC, Education Research Complete, Education Database, and CINAHL. Studies will be independently assessed for risk of bias using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of PROMs. We will summarize and tabulate the basic characteristics of each identified tool and via a comprehensive table we will summarize the reported psychometric properties.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review protocol will outline a comprehensive approach to identifying and evaluating assessment tools for measuring the quality of the CLE in health profession students. It is assumed that the findings will offer several notable advantages and impacts, which could significantly influence the quality of clinical education for health profession students.

摘要

背景

实习可占课程的三分之一,在这些实习期间,培养特定卫生专业能力的基础得以形成。临床学习环境(CLE)是卫生专业教育实习整体质量的关键决定因素,塑造着学生的专业能力和经历。

目的

本系统评价旨在识别和分类可用于评估卫生专业教育中临床学习环境质量的评估工具。

方法

在国际教育系统评价数据库预先注册的系统评价[IDESR000098]将纳入以英文发表的同行评审文章,这些文章中开发并验证了相关工具以说明高等教育卫生专业学生的临床学习环境质量。检索策略将涵盖多个电子数据库,包括MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、ERIC、教育研究完整版、教育数据库和CINAHL。将使用用于患者报告结局测量工具(PROMs)系统评价的COSMIN偏倚风险清单对研究进行独立的偏倚风险评估。我们将总结并列表展示每个已识别工具的基本特征,并通过一个综合表格总结报告的心理测量特性。

讨论

本系统评价方案将概述一种全面的方法,用于识别和评估测量卫生专业学生临床学习环境质量的评估工具。预计研究结果将带来若干显著优势和影响,这可能会显著影响卫生专业学生的临床教育质量。