Tran Joshua Yeuk-Shun, Chan Esther Oi-Ching, Wong Cham-Kit, Lam Gloria Yan-Ting, Choi Tsz-Lung, Mak Rex Wang-Fung, Ng Jonathan Patrick, Ho Kevin Ki-Wai, Yung Patrick Shu-Hang, Ong Michael Tim-Yun
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 4;20(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05709-z.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely performed surgical intervention for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, the influence of coronal plane alignment on clinical outcomes remains unclear. This study evaluates whether alterations in the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification, using the same implant system, affect postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA.
We conducted a retrospective review of 202 patients who underwent primary robotic-assisted TKA between 2019 and 2023 using NAVIO or CORI systems and Journey II implants. Patients were classified based on changes in CPAK classification and functional outcomes assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee Society Function Score (KSFS) at multiple postoperative time points. Statistical analyses compared outcomes between groups with changed and unchanged CPAK.
A total of 202 patients were included. Preoperative demographic characteristics were comparable between groups. Functional outcome scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively showed no significant differences between the changed CPAK group and the unchanged CPAK group (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Subgroup analyses further revealed no statistically significant disparities in functional outcomes based on the type or degree of CPAK changes.
Our findings suggest that changes in coronal plane alignment do not adversely affect functional outcomes following robotic-assisted TKA. This implies that alignment strategy may be less critical to patient satisfaction and functional recovery than previously assumed. Implant-induced alignment changes may contribute to comparable clinical outcomes and could be a key factor in patient recovery. Understanding the relationship between CPAK changes and clinical outcomes can inform best practices in knee arthroplasty, ultimately enhancing patient satisfaction and quality of life post-surgery.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)是针对有症状的膝关节骨关节炎(OA)广泛开展的外科手术干预措施。然而,冠状面排列对临床结局的影响仍不明确。本研究评估在使用相同植入系统的情况下,膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)分类的改变是否会影响接受机器人辅助TKA患者的术后结局。
我们对202例在2019年至2023年间使用NAVIO或CORI系统及Journey II植入物接受初次机器人辅助TKA的患者进行了回顾性研究。根据CPAK分类的变化对患者进行分类,并在多个术后时间点使用膝关节协会评分(KSS)和膝关节协会功能评分(KSFS)评估功能结局。统计分析比较了CPAK改变组和未改变组之间的结局。
共纳入202例患者。术前人口统计学特征在各组之间具有可比性。术后6周、3个月、6个月和12个月的功能结局评分在CPAK改变组和未改变组之间无显著差异(所有比较的p>0.05)。亚组分析进一步显示,基于CPAK改变的类型或程度,功能结局在统计学上无显著差异。
我们的研究结果表明,冠状面排列的改变不会对机器人辅助TKA后的功能结局产生不利影响。这意味着排列策略对患者满意度和功能恢复的重要性可能低于先前的假设。植入物引起的排列改变可能有助于获得可比的临床结局,并且可能是患者恢复的关键因素。了解CPAK改变与临床结局之间的关系可为膝关节置换术的最佳实践提供参考,最终提高患者术后的满意度和生活质量。