Suppr超能文献

产前护理期间的风险分层未能识别出大多数经历不良妊娠结局的母亲:一项来自肯尼亚卡卡梅加县的前瞻性研究。

Risk stratification during antenatal care failed to identify most mothers who experienced adverse pregnancy outcomes: A prospective study from Kakamega County, Kenya.

作者信息

Cooper Jan E, Kruk Margaret, Kapaon David, Opondo Kennedy, Nzinga Jacinta, Kosgei Rose J, Croke Kevin

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Trop Med Int Health. 2025 Jun;30(6):531-538. doi: 10.1111/tmi.14110. Epub 2025 Apr 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Risk stratification of pregnancies informs clinical care globally. Yet recent research has cast doubt on the ability of currently used population-level risk measures to accurately predict poor outcomes at the individual level. We examine the assumption that existing forms of risk stratification can successfully identify women likely to develop complications during delivery in a rural setting in Kenya.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study of 19,653 pregnant women in Kakamega County in Western Kenya. Women were contacted three times during the perinatal period and surveyed about provider-identified risks and self-assessed concerns about pregnancy complications, delivery process outcomes, and adverse delivery outcomes. Measures of risk were derived from women's self-reporting. We compared delivery process outcomes and adverse delivery outcomes between high- and low-risk pregnancies, and between women with and without expressed concerns about delivery complications. Delivery process outcomes included intrapartum referral, unplanned caesarean section, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, or admission to an intensive care unit. Adverse delivery outcomes included stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and maternal mortality. We reported means and confidence intervals for each category, and tested for differences using bivariate linear regression.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight percent of pregnancies had at least one risk factor consistent with a high risk pregnancy; the remaining 62% were low risk by this criteria. Rates of most adverse process outcomes and delivery outcomes were higher among pregnancies with known risks. However, 64.5% of maternal deaths and 54.8% of all deaths in the sample took place among pregnancies characterised as low risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk stratification using existing indicators of risk during pregnancy is inadequate to identify women at risk of adverse health outcomes in this setting.

摘要

引言

妊娠风险分层为全球临床护理提供依据。然而,最近的研究对目前使用的人群水平风险测量方法在个体层面准确预测不良结局的能力提出了质疑。我们检验了现有风险分层形式能否成功识别肯尼亚农村地区分娩期间可能出现并发症的妇女这一假设。

方法

我们对肯尼亚西部卡卡梅加县的19653名孕妇进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。在围产期对这些妇女进行了三次随访,并就医疗服务提供者确定的风险以及她们对妊娠并发症、分娩过程结局和不良分娩结局的自我评估担忧进行了调查。风险测量指标来自妇女的自我报告。我们比较了高风险和低风险妊娠之间,以及对分娩并发症有或没有表达担忧的妇女之间的分娩过程结局和不良分娩结局。分娩过程结局包括产时转诊、计划外剖宫产、输血、子宫切除术或入住重症监护病房。不良分娩结局包括死产、新生儿死亡和孕产妇死亡。我们报告了每个类别的均值和置信区间,并使用双变量线性回归检验差异。

结果

38%的妊娠至少有一个与高风险妊娠一致的风险因素;根据这一标准,其余62%为低风险。大多数不良过程结局和分娩结局的发生率在已知有风险的妊娠中更高。然而,样本中64.5%的孕产妇死亡和54.8%的所有死亡发生在被归类为低风险的妊娠中。

结论

在这种情况下,使用孕期现有风险指标进行风险分层不足以识别有不良健康结局风险的妇女。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e7a/12136940/3e6805938a1f/TMI-30-531-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验