• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健不平等与医疗保健提供者:我们也是问题的一部分。

Healthcare inequities and healthcare providers: we are part of the problem.

作者信息

Campbell Crystal N

机构信息

DNP Nurse Anesthesia Degree Program Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing, University of California Davis, 2570 48th Street, Sacramento, CA, 95817, United States of America.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 7;24(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02464-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-025-02464-9
PMID:40197346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11978196/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The United States (U.S.) spends the highest amount on healthcare globally, at $12,434 per capita, yet experiences poor health outcomes, including lower life expectancy and higher rates of preventable mortality. With a life expectancy of 76.4 years, the U.S. lags behind other high-income countries, which have an average of 81.1 years. Health inequities, especially among marginalized racial and ethnic groups, contribute significantly to these disparities. Implicit bias among healthcare providers plays a critical role in perpetuating these inequities, resulting in misdiagnoses, undertreatment, and patient mistrust.

PURPOSE

This paper examines the role of implicit bias in healthcare disparities, its impact on marginalized populations, and the ethical responsibility of healthcare providers in mitigating bias. It explores the neuroscientific and psychosocial mechanisms of implicit bias and its effects on patient outcomes.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted using PubMed, APA PsycNet, JSTOR, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. The search included peer-reviewed articles from 2008 to 2025 discussing implicit bias in healthcare, its effects on marginalized groups, and evidence-based mitigation strategies. Exclusion criteria included responses and commentaries.

FINDINGS

Quantitative findings on implicit bias mitigation strategies show mixed results. Counter-stereotypic strategies and intention-setting interventions reduced Implicit Association Test (IAT) scores by 0.15 at 4 weeks and 0.17 at 8 weeks. However, some strategies, like stereotype replacement and intergroup contact, consistently showed measurable positive effects. Qualitative findings revealed that simulation-based training and perspective-taking significantly increased self-awareness, empathy, and behavioral changes in healthcare providers. Mindfulness meditation and emotional regulation techniques helped reduce stress and bias in high-pressure settings. These findings suggest that while some strategies are effective in the short term, long-term success requires ongoing training, continuous reflection, and practical application in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Health inequities in the U.S. are a public health crisis, disproportionately affecting marginalized groups. These disparities are preventable, yet persistent due to systemic issues. Healthcare providers must address implicit biases and commit to unbiased, ethical care. Institutions must prioritize health equity through inclusive cultures, comprehensive bias training, and accountability, exemplified by efforts like UW Medicine's bias incident reporting.

摘要

背景

美国在全球医疗保健方面的支出最高,人均达12434美元,但健康结果却很差,包括预期寿命较低和可预防死亡率较高。美国的预期寿命为76.4岁,落后于其他高收入国家,这些国家的平均预期寿命为81.1岁。健康不平等,尤其是在边缘化的种族和族裔群体中,是造成这些差距的重要原因。医疗保健提供者的隐性偏见在使这些不平等长期存在方面起着关键作用,导致误诊、治疗不足和患者不信任。

目的

本文探讨隐性偏见在医疗保健差距中的作用、其对边缘化人群的影响以及医疗保健提供者在减轻偏见方面的道德责任。它探讨了隐性偏见的神经科学和社会心理机制及其对患者结果的影响。

方法

使用PubMed、APA PsycNet、JSTOR、ProQuest和谷歌学术进行文献综述。搜索范围包括2008年至2025年的同行评审文章,讨论医疗保健中的隐性偏见、其对边缘化群体的影响以及基于证据的缓解策略。排除标准包括回应和评论。

结果

关于隐性偏见缓解策略的定量研究结果喜忧参半。反刻板印象策略和设定意图干预在4周时将内隐联想测验(IAT)分数降低了0.15,在8周时降低了0.17。然而,一些策略,如刻板印象替代和群体间接触,始终显示出可衡量的积极效果。定性研究结果表明,基于模拟的培训和换位思考显著提高了医疗保健提供者的自我意识、同理心和行为改变。正念冥想和情绪调节技巧有助于在高压环境中减轻压力和偏见。这些发现表明,虽然一些策略在短期内有效,但长期成功需要持续培训、不断反思以及在临床实践中的实际应用。

结论

美国的健康不平等是一场公共卫生危机,对边缘化群体的影响尤为严重。这些差距是可以预防的,但由于系统性问题而持续存在。医疗保健提供者必须解决隐性偏见问题,并致力于提供无偏见的道德护理。机构必须通过包容性文化、全面的偏见培训和问责制来优先考虑健康公平,华盛顿大学医学中心的偏见事件报告等努力就是例证。

相似文献

1
Healthcare inequities and healthcare providers: we are part of the problem.医疗保健不平等与医疗保健提供者:我们也是问题的一部分。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 7;24(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02464-9.
2
A decade of studying implicit racial/ethnic bias in healthcare providers using the implicit association test.十年来,研究人员一直使用内隐联想测验(IAT)来研究医疗服务提供者中隐含的种族/民族偏见。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;199:219-229. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 4.
3
Mindfulness practice: A promising approach to reducing the effects of clinician implicit bias on patients.正念练习:一种减少临床医生内隐偏见对患者影响的有前景的方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):372-376. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Implicit Racial/Ethnic Bias Among Health Care Professionals and Its Influence on Health Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review.医疗保健专业人员中的隐性种族/民族偏见及其对医疗保健结果的影响:一项系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Dec;105(12):e60-76. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302903. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
6
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.医疗保健专业人员中的隐性偏见:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8.
7
Development of an instrument to measure awareness and mitigation of bias in maternal healthcare.开发一种衡量孕产妇保健中偏见意识和缓解偏见的工具。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Apr;5(4):100872. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100872. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
8
Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and Research Needs.消除医疗保健中的显性和隐性偏见:证据和研究需求。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:477-501. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-103528. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
9
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
10
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Inflammation: The Cause of All Diseases.炎症:百病之源。
Cells. 2024 Nov 18;13(22):1906. doi: 10.3390/cells13221906.
2
Association between experiencing low healthcare quality and developing dementia.经历低质量医疗保健与患痴呆症之间的关联。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):2126-2132. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18842. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
Perceptions of healthcare professionals and students about interventions addressing implicit bias and microaggression: A mixed-studies systematic review.医疗保健专业人员和学生对解决内隐偏见和微侵犯干预措施的看法:混合研究系统评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Nov;73:103820. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103820. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
4
Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.卫生专业人员的无意识偏见:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 12;20(16):6569. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20166569.
5
The Economic Burden of Racial, Ethnic, and Educational Health Inequities in the US.美国种族、民族和教育健康不平等的经济负担。
JAMA. 2023 May 16;329(19):1682-1692. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.5965.
6
"Is it time to throw out the weighing scales?" Implicit weight bias among healthcare professionals working in bariatric surgery services and their attitude towards non-weight focused approaches.“是时候扔掉体重秤了吗?” 从事减肥手术服务的医疗保健专业人员中潜在的体重偏见及其对非以体重为重点的方法的态度。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Dec 14;55:101770. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101770. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Implicit Racial Bias, Health Care Provider Attitudes, and Perceptions of Health Care Quality Among African American College Students in Georgia, USA.美国乔治亚州非裔美国大学生的隐性种族偏见、医疗服务提供者态度和对医疗质量的看法。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Oct;10(5):2600-2612. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01439-8. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
8
Mandated Implicit Bias Training for Health Professionals-A Step Toward Equity in Health Care.对医疗专业人员的强制性隐性偏见培训——迈向医疗保健公平的一步。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Aug 5;3(8):e223250. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3250.
9
Can mental healthcare for Muslim patients be person-centred without consideration of religious identity? A concurrent analysis.穆斯林患者的精神卫生保健能否不考虑宗教身份而以患者为中心?一项同期分析。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Oct;64:103449. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103449. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
10
Examining the Impact of Implicit Bias Education in Healthcare Students.考察医学生隐性偏见教育的影响。
J Allied Health. 2022 Fall;51(3):234-237.