• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动应用程序在青少年心理治疗中的应用:心理治疗师观点评估

The Use of Mobile Apps in Adolescent Psychotherapy: Assessment of Psychotherapists' Perspectives.

作者信息

Wüllner Sarah, Hermenau Katharin, Hecker Tobias, Siniatchkin Michael

机构信息

University Clinic of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical School EWL, Protestant Hospital Bethel, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Institute for Interdisciplinary Conflict and Violence Research, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 8;9:e65788. doi: 10.2196/65788.

DOI:10.2196/65788
PMID:40198916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12015344/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapy-accompanying mental health apps can play an important role in the psychotherapeutic treatment of adolescents. They can enhance adolescents' engagement and autonomy, provide immediate support in critical situations, and positively influence the therapeutic working alliance. Nevertheless, mental health apps are rarely used by psychotherapists. Furthermore, due to the limited or nonexistent use of apps in psychotherapy, little is known about the actual barriers and drivers affecting their integration into psychotherapists' daily routines. To better understand how mental health apps should be designed for practical use, it is essential to explore psychotherapists' perspectives on key app features and characteristics, as well as the factors influencing their integration into clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze which app features and characteristics are essential for psychotherapists to use a mobile app in psychotherapy with adolescents and to identify the key drivers and barriers influencing the integration of a psychotherapeutic app from the psychotherapists' perspectives.

METHODS

We conducted 3 feasibility studies using Steps, a transdiagnostic, therapy-accompanying app for adolescents, across 3 different psychotherapeutic treatment contexts: inpatient treatment, treatment in psychiatric outpatient clinics, and outpatient treatment with psychotherapists in private practice. All studies followed a qualitative quasi-experimental design. Participants provided information on their age, occupation, years of work experience, media affinity, attitudes toward psychotherapeutic apps, perceived app quality and feasibility, and the implementation process of the therapy-accompanying app. Qualitative data were analyzed using deductive qualitative content analysis. A total of 40 mental health professionals participated across the 3 studies (study 1: n=18; study 2: n=13; study 3: n=9).

RESULTS

Study participation and app usage rates were low across all studies. Six core features for a transdiagnostic, therapy-accompanying app were identified: mood checks, library, reminders, goals and tasks, emergency kit, and questionnaires. Additionally, the integration of mental health apps into daily routines was influenced by various drivers and barriers. The most significant barriers included technological issues and practical constraints, such as limited time and resources. The most important driver was the perceived improvement in treatment quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, psychotherapists were generally open to using a therapy-accompanying mental health app. However, study participation and app usage remained low. As psychotherapists act as gatekeepers for patients' use of mental health apps, their needs should be prioritized in the development and implementation of such apps.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00031258; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00031258/details.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c03/12015344/b35287987a04/formative_v9i1e65788_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c03/12015344/4637580cc665/formative_v9i1e65788_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c03/12015344/01df17df1a3b/formative_v9i1e65788_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c03/12015344/519fcd826599/formative_v9i1e65788_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c03/12015344/b35287987a04/formative_v9i1e65788_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c03/12015344/4637580cc665/formative_v9i1e65788_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c03/12015344/01df17df1a3b/formative_v9i1e65788_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c03/12015344/519fcd826599/formative_v9i1e65788_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c03/12015344/b35287987a04/formative_v9i1e65788_fig4.jpg
摘要

背景

辅助治疗的心理健康应用程序在青少年心理治疗中可发挥重要作用。它们能提高青少年的参与度和自主性,在关键情况下提供即时支持,并对治疗工作联盟产生积极影响。然而,心理治疗师很少使用心理健康应用程序。此外,由于心理治疗中应用程序的使用有限或不存在,对于影响其融入心理治疗师日常工作的实际障碍和驱动因素知之甚少。为了更好地理解心理健康应用程序应如何设计以实际应用,探索心理治疗师对应用程序关键功能和特性的看法以及影响其融入临床实践的因素至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在分析哪些应用程序功能和特性对于心理治疗师在青少年心理治疗中使用移动应用程序至关重要,并从心理治疗师的角度确定影响心理治疗应用程序融入的关键驱动因素和障碍。

方法

我们使用Steps(一款针对青少年的跨诊断、辅助治疗应用程序)在3种不同的心理治疗环境中进行了3项可行性研究:住院治疗、精神科门诊治疗以及私人执业心理治疗师的门诊治疗。所有研究均采用定性准实验设计。参与者提供了有关他们的年龄、职业、工作年限、媒体亲和力、对心理治疗应用程序的态度、感知的应用程序质量和可行性以及辅助治疗应用程序的实施过程的信息。定性数据采用演绎定性内容分析法进行分析。3项研究共有40名心理健康专业人员参与(研究1:n = 18;研究2:n = 13;研究3:n = 9)。

结果

所有研究中的研究参与率和应用程序使用率都很低。确定了一款跨诊断、辅助治疗应用程序的六个核心功能:情绪检查、资料库、提醒、目标和任务、应急包以及问卷。此外,心理健康应用程序融入日常工作受到各种驱动因素和障碍的影响。最主要的障碍包括技术问题和实际限制,如时间和资源有限。最重要的驱动因素是感知到的治疗质量的提高。

结论

总体而言,心理治疗师通常对使用辅助治疗的心理健康应用程序持开放态度。然而,研究参与率和应用程序使用率仍然很低。由于心理治疗师是患者使用心理健康应用程序的把关人,在开发和实施此类应用程序时应优先考虑他们的需求。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册中心DRKS00031258;https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00031258/details。

相似文献

1
The Use of Mobile Apps in Adolescent Psychotherapy: Assessment of Psychotherapists' Perspectives.移动应用程序在青少年心理治疗中的应用:心理治疗师观点评估
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Apr 8;9:e65788. doi: 10.2196/65788.
2
Exploring Psychotherapists' Attitudes on Internet- and Mobile-Based Interventions in Germany: Thematic Analysis.探索德国心理治疗师对基于互联网和移动设备的干预措施的态度:主题分析。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 7;8:e51832. doi: 10.2196/51832.
3
Benefits and Barriers to mHealth in Hypertension Care: Qualitative Study With German Health Care Professionals.移动医疗在高血压护理中的益处与障碍:对德国医疗保健专业人员的定性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 10;12:e52544. doi: 10.2196/52544.
4
Insights Into How mHealth Applications Could Be Introduced Into Standard Hypertension Care in Germany: Qualitative Study With German Cardiologists and General Practitioners.关于移动健康应用程序如何引入德国标准高血压护理的见解:对德国心脏病专家和全科医生的定性研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Mar 28;13:e56666. doi: 10.2196/56666.
5
Mobile applications in adolescent psychotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.移动应用程序在 COVID-19 大流行期间的青少年心理治疗中的应用:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 14;12:1345808. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1345808. eCollection 2024.
6
The Factors of the Psychotherapists' Attitude Towards Technology: Combining Attitudes Towards Technology and Technology Readiness Models.治疗师对技术态度的影响因素:结合技术态度和技术准备模型。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Sep-Oct;31(5):e3055. doi: 10.1002/cpp.3055.
7
Provider Perspectives on the Use of Mental Health Apps, and the BritePath App in Particular, With Adolescents at Risk for Suicidal Behavior: Qualitative Study.提供者对心理健康应用程序,特别是BritePath应用程序在有自杀行为风险的青少年中的使用看法:定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Feb 26;12:e64867. doi: 10.2196/64867.
8
Psychotherapists' perspectives on collaboration and stepped care in outpatient psychotherapy-A qualitative study.心理治疗师对外科门诊心理治疗中的协作和分级护理的看法——一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 5;15(2):e0228748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228748. eCollection 2020.
9
A Conversational Artificial Intelligence Agent for a Mental Health Care App: Evaluation Study of Its Participatory Design.一款用于心理健康护理应用程序的对话式人工智能代理:其参与式设计的评估研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Dec 1;5(12):e30053. doi: 10.2196/30053.
10
The Acceptability, Engagement, and Feasibility of Mental Health Apps for Marginalized and Underserved Young People: Systematic Review and Qualitative Study.边缘化和服务不足的年轻人使用心理健康应用的可接受性、参与度和可行性:系统评价和定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 30;26:e48964. doi: 10.2196/48964.

本文引用的文献

1
Mobile applications in adolescent psychotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.移动应用程序在 COVID-19 大流行期间的青少年心理治疗中的应用:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 14;12:1345808. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1345808. eCollection 2024.
2
Effectiveness of Online and Remote Interventions for Mental Health in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新冠大流行背景下儿童、青少年和青年心理健康的在线和远程干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Feb 5;11:e46637. doi: 10.2196/46637.
3
[Efficacy of internet-based interventions for depression available in Germany-A systematic review and meta-analysis].
[德国可用的基于互联网的抑郁症干预措施的疗效——系统评价与荟萃分析]
Nervenarzt. 2024 Mar;95(3):206-215. doi: 10.1007/s00115-023-01587-0. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
4
Exploring Adolescents' Attitudes Toward Mental Health Apps: Concurrent Mixed Methods Study.探索青少年对心理健康应用程序的态度:同步混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 15;8:e50222. doi: 10.2196/50222.
5
Rates of attrition and engagement in randomized controlled trials of mindfulness apps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.正念应用程序随机对照试验中的损耗率和参与率:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Behav Res Ther. 2023 Nov;170:104421. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104421. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
6
E-mental health in Germany - what is the current use and what are experiences of different types of health care providers for patients with mental illnesses?德国的电子心理健康——目前的使用情况如何,以及不同类型的医疗服务提供者对精神疾病患者的经验有哪些?
Arch Public Health. 2023 Jul 17;81(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01150-y.
7
Impact of virtual reality applications in the treatment of anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.虚拟现实应用在焦虑障碍治疗中的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;81:101893. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101893. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
8
Therapist-supported Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy yields similar effects as face-to-face therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗师支持的基于互联网的认知行为疗法对精神疾病和躯体疾病产生的效果与面对面治疗相似:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;22(2):305-314. doi: 10.1002/wps.21088.
9
Attitudes of Children, Adolescents, and Their Parents Toward Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review.儿童、青少年及其家长对数字健康干预措施的态度:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 2;25:e43102. doi: 10.2196/43102.
10
Drop-out and ineffective treatment in youth with severe and enduring mental health problems: a systematic review.青少年严重且持久的心理健康问题中的辍学和无效治疗:系统评价。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;33(10):3305-3319. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02182-z. Epub 2023 Mar 7.