Edvardsson Kristina, Egan Nicholas, Taft Angela, Norman Wendy V, Harris Melissa L, Black Kirsten I, Bateson Deborah, Hooker Leesa, Shankar Mridula
Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
SPHERE Centre of Research Excellence in Women's Sexual and Reproductive Health in Primary Care, Department of General Practice, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Int J Epidemiol. 2025 Feb 16;54(2). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaf028.
To explore time trends in abortion based on method used and characteristics associated with method type by uniquely linking social and behavioral data reported by a population-based cohort of young Australian women.
We analysed self-reported data from 16 993 women in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health 1989-95 cohort, aged 18-24 years at recruitment in 2013, linked to abortion data from three population-based administrative data sources.
The incidence of medication abortion increased over time whereas surgical abortion decreased, with similar trends across the largest states. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of having a medication compared with a surgical abortion increased over time [by each 1-year increase in time, 1.33 (95% confidence interval 1.20, 1.48)]. Women who lived in outer regional/remote/very remote areas [AOR 3.51 (2.15, 5.74)] and inner regional areas [1.80 (1.21, 2.69)] had increased odds of a medication abortion compared with women who were living in major cities. Medication abortions were more common than surgical abortions in outer regional/remote/very remote areas from 2017 whereas, in major cities, surgical abortion remained the most common abortion method throughout the study period.
Linkage of government-recorded health events with self-reports demonstrated a shift towards increasing use of medication abortion relative to surgical abortion, with greater increases in nonmetropolitan areas. The strong geographical disparities in abortion method suggest that, for those who are living in nonmetropolitan areas, there may be less opportunity to choose surgical abortion due to limited availability of services, with significant implications for women who present later in pregnancy.
通过将澳大利亚年轻女性人群队列报告的社会和行为数据进行独特关联,探讨基于所用方法及与方法类型相关特征的堕胎时间趋势。
我们分析了澳大利亚妇女健康纵向研究1989 - 95队列中16993名女性的自我报告数据,这些女性在2013年招募时年龄为18 - 24岁,并与来自三个基于人群的行政数据源的堕胎数据相关联。
药物流产的发生率随时间增加,而手术流产减少,最大的几个州呈现相似趋势。与手术流产相比,进行药物流产的调整优势比(AOR)随时间增加[时间每增加1年,AOR为1.33(95%置信区间1.20,1.48)]。与居住在大城市的女性相比,居住在偏远地区/偏远/非常偏远地区的女性[ AOR 3.51(2.15,5.74)]和内陆地区的女性[1.80(1.21,2.69)]进行药物流产的几率增加。2017年起,在偏远地区/偏远/非常偏远地区,药物流产比手术流产更常见,而在大城市,手术流产在整个研究期间仍是最常见的堕胎方法。
政府记录的健康事件与自我报告的关联表明,相对于手术流产,药物流产的使用呈增加趋势,在非大都市地区增加幅度更大。堕胎方法存在明显的地理差异,这表明对于居住在非大都市地区的人来说,由于服务可及性有限,选择手术流产的机会可能较少,这对怀孕后期就诊的女性有重大影响。