Black D, Mann R J, Constine R, Daniels A U
J Hand Surg Am. 1985 Jul;10(4):466-72. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(85)80067-8.
A biomechanical study assessed quantitative differences in the stability that was obtained by five commonly used types of internal fixation employed in metacarpal fractures. The techniques included dorsal plating, dorsal plating combined with an interfragmentary lag screw, crossed Kirschner wires, a single intraosseous wire combined with a single oblique Kirschner wire, and a single intraosseous wire alone. Rigidity and strength in torsion and bending were determined after transverse osteotomy and fixation of the metacarpal were performed. The failure modes for each fixation technique were also observed and described. Significant differences in rigidity were found between the plated configurations (with or without an interfragmentary lag screw) and the wired configurations in both apex dorsal bending and axial torsion. The three wired configurations were not significantly different from each other except in torsion. Analysis of the bending moments that were required to produce both yield and failure in apex dorsal bending and also the energy absorbed to yield showed similar disparity between plated and wired techniques. For metacarpal fixation, dorsal plating with or without lag screws provides significantly more stability than do wired techniques and approaches that provided by intact bones.
一项生物力学研究评估了掌骨骨折常用的五种内固定方式所获得的稳定性的定量差异。这些技术包括背侧钢板固定、背侧钢板联合骨折块间拉力螺钉、交叉克氏针、单根骨内钢丝联合单根斜行克氏针以及单纯单根骨内钢丝。在进行掌骨横向截骨并固定后,测定其扭转和弯曲的刚度及强度。还观察并描述了每种固定技术的失效模式。在背侧顶点弯曲和轴向扭转方面,钢板固定构型(有或无骨折块间拉力螺钉)与钢丝固定构型之间的刚度存在显著差异。除扭转外,三种钢丝固定构型彼此之间无显著差异。对背侧顶点弯曲产生屈服和失效所需的弯矩以及屈服时吸收的能量进行分析,结果表明钢板固定技术与钢丝固定技术之间也存在类似差异。对于掌骨固定,带或不带拉力螺钉的背侧钢板固定比钢丝固定技术以及完整骨骼所提供的稳定性显著更高。