Suppr超能文献

用于肾结石光谱分析的人工智能:在临床实验室中使用人工智能算法进行质量保证。

Artificial Intelligence for Kidney Stone Spectra Analysis: Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Quality Assurance in the Clinical Laboratory.

作者信息

Day Patrick L, Erdahl Sarah, Rokke Denise L, Wieczorek Mikolaj, Johnson Patrick W, Jannetto Paul J, Bornhorst Joshua A, Carter Rickey E

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Feb 8;1(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.01.001. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a set of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms could be leveraged to interpret Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra and detect potentially erroneous stone composition results reported in the laboratory information system by the clinical laboratory.

BACKGROUND

Nephrolithiasis (kidney stones) is highly prevalent, causes significant pain, and costs billions of dollars annually to treat and prevent. Currently, FTIR is considered the reference method for clinical kidney stone constituent analysis. This process, however, involves human interpretation of spectra by a qualified technologist and is susceptible to human error.

METHODS

This prospective validation study was conducted from October 29, 2020, to October 28, 2021, to test if the addition of AI algorithm overreads to FTIR spectra could improve the detection rate of technologist-misclassified FTIR spectra. The preceding year was used as a control period. Disagreement between the AI overread and technician interpretation was resolved by an independent human interpretation. The rate of verified human misclassifications that resulted in revised reported results was the primary end point.

RESULTS

Spectra of 81,517 kidney stones were reviewed over the course of 1 year. The overall clinical concordance between the technologist and algorithm was 90.0% (73,388/81,517). The report revision rate during the AI implementation period was nearly 8 times higher than that during the control period (relative risk, 7.9; 95% CI, 4.1-15.2).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that an AI quality assurance check of human spectra interpretation resulted in the identification of a significant increase in erroneously classified spectra by clinical laboratory technologists.

摘要

目的

确定是否可以利用一组人工智能(AI)算法来解读傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)光谱,并检测临床实验室在实验室信息系统中报告的潜在错误的结石成分结果。

背景

肾结石非常普遍,会引起严重疼痛,每年治疗和预防的费用高达数十亿美元。目前,FTIR被认为是临床肾结石成分分析的参考方法。然而,这个过程需要由合格的技术人员对光谱进行人工解读,容易出现人为错误。

方法

这项前瞻性验证研究于2020年10月29日至2021年10月28日进行,以测试在FTIR光谱中添加AI算法解读是否能提高技术人员错误分类的FTIR光谱的检测率。前一年作为对照期。AI解读与技术人员解读之间的分歧通过独立的人工解读来解决。导致报告结果修订的经核实的人为错误分类率是主要终点。

结果

在1年的时间里,共审查了81,517颗肾结石的光谱。技术人员与算法之间的总体临床一致性为90.0%(73,388/81,517)。AI实施期间的报告修订率几乎是对照期的8倍(相对风险,7.9;95%CI,4.1-15.2)。

结论

本研究表明,对人工光谱解读进行AI质量保证检查可显著提高临床实验室技术人员错误分类光谱的识别率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21f7/11975758/25dbcb093f0f/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验