• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

野猪对美国农作物和畜牧场造成损害的外部性:土地所有者行为和景观异质性的作用。

Externalities in wild pig damages on U.S. crop and livestock farms: The role of landowner actions and landscape heterogeneity.

作者信息

McKee Sophie C, DeLay Nathan D, Mooney Daniel F, Shwiff Stephanie A

机构信息

National Wildlife Research Center, United States of America Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.

Department of Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Apr 10;20(4):e0320316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320316. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0320316
PMID:40209149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11984977/
Abstract

Invasive wild pigs can impose significant economic costs on crop and livestock farms. Many factors influence the incidence and intensity of these losses, making efforts to reduce or eradicate these populations complex. While farm and ranch operators may perceive wild pigs as agricultural pests, other landowners often see them as wild game with recreational value. This study investigates the relationship between landowner practices that attract wild pigs and the likelihood of pig presence and damage on farm and ranch operations. It considers the farmers' own actions that attract wildlife, neighboring landowner actions, the heterogeneity of the surrounding landscape, and county-level factors. The findings show a significant and positive associations between neighbors' actions and the probability of wild pig presence and financial losses from wild pig damage. Additionally, increasingly heterogeneous landscapes may further exacerbate this challenge. This research indicates that the choices made by adjacent property owners can undermine the effectiveness of public and private efforts to manage wild pig populations. Conversely, the impacts of wild pig management likely extend beyond specific management areas. Holistic eradication or population control programs should consider these externalities to adequately and efficiently address their impacts.

摘要

入侵性野猪会给农作物和畜牧场带来巨大的经济成本。许多因素影响着这些损失的发生率和严重程度,使得减少或根除这些野猪种群的努力变得复杂。虽然农场和牧场经营者可能将野猪视为农业害虫,但其他土地所有者通常将它们视为具有娱乐价值的野生动物。本研究调查了吸引野猪的土地所有者行为与农场和牧场运营中野猪出现及造成损害的可能性之间的关系。它考虑了农民自身吸引野生动物的行为、相邻土地所有者的行为、周围景观的异质性以及县级因素。研究结果表明,邻居的行为与野猪出现的概率以及野猪造成损害的经济损失之间存在显著的正相关关系。此外,景观异质性增加可能会进一步加剧这一挑战。这项研究表明,相邻土地所有者的选择可能会破坏公共和私人管理野猪种群努力的有效性。相反,野猪管理的影响可能超出特定管理区域。全面的根除或种群控制计划应考虑这些外部因素,以充分有效地应对其影响。

相似文献

1
Externalities in wild pig damages on U.S. crop and livestock farms: The role of landowner actions and landscape heterogeneity.野猪对美国农作物和畜牧场造成损害的外部性:土地所有者行为和景观异质性的作用。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 10;20(4):e0320316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320316. eCollection 2025.
2
Mixed crop-livestock systems: an economic and environmental-friendly way of farming?种养结合系统:一种经济环保的农业方式?
Animal. 2012 Oct;6(10):1722-30. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000675. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
3
Simulating the Distribution of Individual Livestock Farms and Their Populations in the United States: An Example Using Domestic Swine (Sus scrofa domesticus) Farms.模拟美国个体畜牧场及其种群分布:以家猪(Sus scrofa domesticus)养殖场为例
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 16;10(11):e0140338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140338. eCollection 2015.
4
Highly diversified crop-livestock farming systems reshape wild bird communities.高度多样化的种养结合系统重塑了野生鸟类群落。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Mar;30(2):e02031. doi: 10.1002/eap.2031. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
Perceptions of Wild Pig Impact, Management, and Policy in Alabama.阿拉巴马州野猪影响、管理和政策认知。
Environ Manage. 2024 May;73(5):1032-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01956-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
6
Cultural and regulatory factors influence distribution and trajectory of invasive species in the United States: A wild pig case study.文化和监管因素影响美国入侵物种的分布和轨迹:野猪案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jul 15;338:117742. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117742. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
7
Changes in wild pig (Sus scrofa) relative abundance, crop damage, and environmental impacts in response to control efforts.野猪(Sus scrofa)相对丰度、作物损害及环境影响随控制措施的变化情况。
Pest Manag Sci. 2023 Dec;79(12):4765-4773. doi: 10.1002/ps.7671. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
8
Determinants of persistence and tolerance of carnivores on Namibian ranches: implications for conservation on Southern African private lands.纳米比亚牧场中肉食动物的持久性和耐受性的决定因素:对南部非洲私人土地保护的启示。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052458. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
9
Relevance of farm-scale indicators and tools for farmers to assess sustainability of their mixed crop-ruminant livestock systems.农场规模指标和工具对农民评估其混合作物-反刍动物牲畜系统可持续性的相关性。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 10;950:175218. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175218. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
10
Risk factors for farm-level African swine fever infection in major pig-producing areas in Nigeria, 1997-2011.1997-2011 年尼日利亚主要养猪地区农场层面非洲猪瘟感染的风险因素。
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Nov 1;107(1-2):65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Agricultural and Ecological Resources Safeguarded by the Prevention of Wild Pig Population Expansion.通过防止野猪种群扩张来保障农业和生态资源。
Biology (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;13(9):670. doi: 10.3390/biology13090670.
2
Optimising response to an introduction of African swine fever in wild pigs.优化对野猪中非洲猪瘟引入的反应。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Sep;69(5):e3111-e3127. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14668. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
3
Effects of social structure and management on risk of disease establishment in wild pigs.社会结构和管理对野猪发病风险的影响。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Apr;90(4):820-833. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13412. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
4
Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management.更好地将集体行动理论应用于入侵物种管理的研究和治理的机会。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Apr;33(2):275-287. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13266. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
5
Cross-species transmission potential between wild pigs, livestock, poultry, wildlife, and humans: implications for disease risk management in North America.野生猪、家畜、家禽、野生动物和人类之间的跨物种传播潜力:对北美的疾病风险管理的影响。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 10;7(1):7821. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07336-z.
6
Evidence of leptospirosis in the kidneys and serum of feral swine (Sus scrofa) in the United States.美国野猪(Sus scrofa)肾脏和血清中钩端螺旋体病的证据。
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Jan;145(1):87-94. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816002247. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
7
Evaluating the risk of pathogen transmission from wild animals to domestic pigs in Australia.评估澳大利亚野生动物向家猪传播病原体的风险。
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Jan 1;123:39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.017. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
8
Using economic instruments to develop effective management of invasive species: insights from a bioeconomic model.利用经济手段制定有效的入侵物种管理策略:来自生物经济模型的启示。
Ecol Appl. 2013 Jul;23(5):1086-100. doi: 10.1890/12-0649.1.
9
Crop damage and livestock depredation by wildlife: a case study from Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India.野生动物对农作物的损害和对牲畜的掠夺:来自印度南达维生物圈保护区的案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2002 Nov;66(3):317-27. doi: 10.1006/jema.2002.0587.