Prod'homme Chloé, Deschasse Guillaume, Visade Fabien, Hennion Camille, Charpentier Anne, Gaxatte Cedric, Bloch Frederic, Delecluse Celine, Puisieux François, Beuscart Jean-Baptiste
Palliative care unit, Univ. Lille, ULR 2694 METRICS, CHU Lille, Lille, F-59000, France.
University Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694-METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de Santé et des Pratiques Médicales, Lille, France.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05860-6.
End-of-life management in acute geriatric units (AGUs) is frequent but complex. Midazolam is the drug of choice for the management of refractory symptoms (particularly in the context of sedation) at the end of life. The objective of the present ambispective analysis was to investigate the frequency and modalities of midazolam use for palliative care in AGUs in France.
We conducted a prospective study in four AGUs in France, in order to identify patients having received comfort care only and having been treated with midazolam. We then retrospectively documented the modalities of midazolam use, the indications, and the level of effectiveness.
Of the 210 patients identified as having received comfort care only in the AGU, 68 (32.4% (95%CI, 26.1 to 39.2%)) had received midazolam. The indication for midazolam corresponded to sedation in 67.6% of cases. The modalities of midazolam use at the end -of -life were rarely personalized, with low dose levels (less than 0.5 mg/h), mainly subcutaneous administration, and little anticipatory prescribing or dose level titration. The modalities did not appear to vary with the indication (anxiolysis vs. sedation).
The present study is one of the first to have described the frequency and characteristics of palliative midazolam use in the AGU. Our results showed that the end-of-life use of midazolam is rarely personalized, not explicitly documented, and often not compliant with the current guidelines on palliative sedation practices.
NCT02949635. Registration Date: 2016-09-07.
在急性老年病科(AGU)进行临终管理很常见,但也很复杂。咪达唑仑是临终时处理难治性症状(特别是在镇静情况下)的首选药物。本回顾性分析的目的是调查法国急性老年病科中使用咪达唑仑进行姑息治疗的频率和方式。
我们在法国的四个急性老年病科进行了一项前瞻性研究,以确定仅接受舒适护理并接受咪达唑仑治疗的患者。然后,我们回顾性记录了咪达唑仑的使用方式、适应症和有效性水平。
在急性老年病科中被确定为仅接受舒适护理的210名患者中,68名(32.4%(95%置信区间,26.1%至39.2%))接受了咪达唑仑治疗。咪达唑仑的适应症在67.6%的病例中为镇静。临终时咪达唑仑的使用方式很少个性化,剂量水平较低(低于0.5毫克/小时),主要为皮下给药,很少有预先给药或剂量水平滴定。这些方式似乎不因适应症(抗焦虑与镇静)而异。
本研究是最早描述急性老年病科中姑息性使用咪达唑仑的频率和特征的研究之一。我们的结果表明,临终时使用咪达唑仑很少个性化,没有明确记录,并且常常不符合当前关于姑息性镇静实践的指南。
NCT02949635。注册日期:2016年9月7日。