• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

洞察中国公共卫生应急响应中的公众情绪与需求:一项微博数据分析

Insight into public sentiment and demand in China's public health emergency response: a weibo data analysis.

作者信息

Wang Yanping, Wei Min, Wang Peng, Gao Yiran, Yu Tian, Meng Nan, Liu Huan, Zhang Xin, Wang Kexin, Wu Qunhong

机构信息

School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, No 157 Bao Jian Road, Harbin, 150081, China.

School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, No 157 Bao Jian Road, Harbin, 150081, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):1349. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22553-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-22553-2
PMID:40211194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11983825/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the COVID-19 pandemic, public sentiment and demands have been prominently reflected on social media platforms like Weibo. Understanding these sentiments and demands is crucial for governments, health officials, and policymakers to make effective responses and adjustments.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to analyze public sentiment and identify key demands concerning COVID-19 policies and social issues using Weibo data, providing insights to improve China's policies and legal systems in public health emergencies.

METHODS

The study used Python tools to collect public opinion data from Weibo regarding policy adjustments, social issues, and livelihood concerns. A total of 50,249 valid comments on 100 blog posts were collected from December 2019 to October 2023 in China. The SnowNLP algorithm was employed for sentiment analysis, Latent Dirichlet Allocation was used for topic clustering, and sampling coding was applied to further explore public demands by condensing the comment texts.

RESULTS

The study categorized 100 blog posts into 23 important topics, with average sentiment scores ranging from 0.24 to 0.66. These scores ranging from 0 to 1 reflect sentiment polarity, where lower values indicate more negative public sentiment. The topics of material safety and information security management had the lowest scores, at 0.24 and 0.34, respectively. The analysis further revealed that the 23 topics could be classified into 57 subtopics, and a total of 101 concepts were identified through coding. The study found that public demands fall into five key categories: transportation and travel security, epidemic protection and health security, law building and policy implementation, social services and public demand, and education demand.

CONCLUSIONS

The study underscores the complexity of public sentiment during the epidemic, with significant concerns about material safety and information security management. Public demands span basic survival needs to higher-order concerns such as education and legal protections. The findings suggest that policy-making processes must become more responsive, transparent, and equitable, incorporating real-time public feedback and ensuring comprehensive policies and legal systems are in place to address multifaceted public demands effectively.

摘要

背景

在新冠疫情期间,公众情绪和需求在微博等社交媒体平台上得到了显著体现。了解这些情绪和需求对于政府、卫生官员和政策制定者做出有效应对和调整至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在利用微博数据分析公众情绪,识别有关新冠疫情政策和社会问题的关键需求,为完善中国公共卫生突发事件的政策和法律体系提供见解。

方法

本研究使用Python工具收集微博上关于政策调整、社会问题和民生关切的民意数据。2019年12月至2023年10月期间,在中国共收集了100篇博客文章的50249条有效评论。采用SnowNLP算法进行情感分析,使用潜在狄利克雷分配进行主题聚类,并应用抽样编码通过浓缩评论内容进一步探索公众需求。

结果

该研究将100篇博客文章分为23个重要主题,平均情感得分在0.24至0.66之间。这些得分范围从0到1反映了情感极性,较低的值表明公众情绪更消极。物质安全和信息安全管理主题得分最低,分别为0.24和0.34。分析进一步表明,这23个主题可分为57个子主题,通过编码共识别出101个概念。研究发现公众需求主要分为五个关键类别:交通出行安全、疫情防护与健康安全、法治建设与政策执行、社会服务与公共需求、教育需求。

结论

该研究强调了疫情期间公众情绪的复杂性,人们对物质安全和信息安全管理存在重大担忧。公众需求涵盖了从基本生存需求到教育和法律保护等更高层次的关切。研究结果表明,决策过程必须更加及时、透明和公平,纳入实时公众反馈,并确保有全面的政策和法律体系来有效应对多方面的公众需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4956/11983825/963a666dde56/12889_2025_22553_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4956/11983825/8faa05d07738/12889_2025_22553_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4956/11983825/b7219cae62cd/12889_2025_22553_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4956/11983825/ef5332ab0cea/12889_2025_22553_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4956/11983825/0b8157dd94ec/12889_2025_22553_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4956/11983825/963a666dde56/12889_2025_22553_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4956/11983825/8faa05d07738/12889_2025_22553_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4956/11983825/b7219cae62cd/12889_2025_22553_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4956/11983825/ef5332ab0cea/12889_2025_22553_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4956/11983825/0b8157dd94ec/12889_2025_22553_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4956/11983825/963a666dde56/12889_2025_22553_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Insight into public sentiment and demand in China's public health emergency response: a weibo data analysis.洞察中国公共卫生应急响应中的公众情绪与需求:一项微博数据分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):1349. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22553-2.
2
Chinese Public Attitudes and Opinions on Health Policies During Public Health Emergencies: Sentiment and Topic Analysis.中国公众对突发公共卫生事件卫生政策的态度和意见:情感和主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 28;26:e58518. doi: 10.2196/58518.
3
Sentiment Analysis of Texts on Public Health Emergencies Based on Social Media Data Mining.基于社交媒体数据挖掘的突发公共卫生事件文本情感分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Aug 9;2022:3964473. doi: 10.1155/2022/3964473. eCollection 2022.
4
Temporal and Emotional Variations in People's Perceptions of Mass Epidemic Infectious Disease After the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Influenza A as an Example: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis Based on Weibo Data.基于微博数据的主题建模和情感分析:以甲型流感为例探讨 COVID-19 大流行后人们对大规模传染病的时间和情感变化
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 2;25:e49300. doi: 10.2196/49300.
5
Concerns Expressed by Chinese Social Media Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis of Sina Weibo Microblogging Data.新冠疫情期间中国社交媒体用户表达的担忧:对新浪微博数据的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 26;22(11):e22152. doi: 10.2196/22152.
6
Comparison of Public Responses to Containment Measures During the Initial Outbreak and Resurgence of COVID-19 in China: Infodemiology Study.中国 COVID-19 初始爆发和复燃期间公众对遏制措施的反应比较:信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 5;23(4):e26518. doi: 10.2196/26518.
7
Long-term Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Public Sentiments in Mainland China: Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Posts.新冠肺炎疫情对中国大陆公众情绪的长期影响:社交媒体帖子的情绪分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 12;23(8):e29150. doi: 10.2196/29150.
8
Using Social Media to Mine and Analyze Public Opinion Related to COVID-19 in China.利用社交媒体挖掘和分析中国与 COVID-19 相关的公众意见。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 17;17(8):2788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082788.
9
Evolution of Public Attitudes and Opinions Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination During the Vaccine Campaign in China: Year-Long Infodemiology Study of Weibo Posts.中国疫苗接种运动期间公众对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的态度和看法的演变:对微博帖子进行的为期一年的信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 16;25:e42671. doi: 10.2196/42671.
10
Temporal Dynamics of Public Emotions During the COVID-19 Pandemic at the Epicenter of the Outbreak: Sentiment Analysis of Weibo Posts From Wuhan.新冠疫情期间疫情中心地区公众情绪的时间动态:来自武汉微博帖子的情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 18;23(3):e27078. doi: 10.2196/27078.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolving Face Mask Guidance During a Pandemic and Potential Harm to Public Perception: Infodemiology Study of Sentiment and Emotion on Twitter.大流行期间不断变化的口罩指南和对公众认知的潜在危害:Twitter 上情感的信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 27;25:e40706. doi: 10.2196/40706.
2
Well-being variations on students of health sciences related to their learning opportunities, resources, and daily activities in an online and on-crisis context: a survey-based study.健康科学专业学生的幸福感与他们在在线和危机背景下的学习机会、资源和日常活动有关:一项基于调查的研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 18;23(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04011-y.
3
Challenges and future opportunities to unlock the critical supply chain of personal and protective equipment (PPE) encompassing decontamination and reuse under emergency use authorization (EUA) conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic: Through a reflective circularity and sustainability lens.
解锁个人和防护设备(PPE)关键供应链的挑战和未来机遇,涵盖在 COVID-19 大流行期间紧急使用授权(EUA)条件下的消毒和再利用:通过反思性的循环和可持续性视角。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Mar 25;866:161455. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161455. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
4
Does government social media promote users' information security behavior towards COVID-19 scams? Cultivation effects and protective motivations.政府社交媒体是否能促进用户针对新冠疫情诈骗的信息安全行为?培养效应与保护动机。
Gov Inf Q. 2021 Apr;38(2):101572. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101572. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
5
How stock markets reacted to COVID-19? Evidence from 25 countries.股票市场如何应对新冠疫情?来自25个国家的证据。
Financ Res Lett. 2022 Mar;45:102161. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102161. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Cross-platform analysis of public responses to the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence on Twitter and Reddit.跨平台分析公众在 Twitter 和 Reddit 上对 2019 年里德斯克里克地震序列的反应。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):1634. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05359-9.
7
Network Structure and Community Evolution Online: Behavioral and Emotional Changes in Response to COVID-19.网络结构和社区演变在线:对 COVID-19 的行为和情绪变化的反应。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 11;9:813234. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.813234. eCollection 2021.
8
Analysis of public opinion evolution of COVID-19 based on LDA-ARMA hybrid model.基于LDA-ARMA混合模型的新冠疫情舆情演变分析
Complex Intell Systems. 2021;7(6):3165-3178. doi: 10.1007/s40747-021-00514-7. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
9
Emotions during the Covid-19 pandemic: Fear, anxiety, and anger as mediators between threats and policy support and political actions.新冠疫情期间的情绪:恐惧、焦虑和愤怒作为威胁与政策支持及政治行动之间的中介因素
J Appl Soc Psychol. 2021 Aug;51(8):861-877. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12806. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
10
Logic Analysis of How the Emergency Management Legal System Used to Deal with Public Emerging Infectious Diseases under Balancing of Competing Interests-The Case of COVID-19.利益平衡视角下应急管理法律制度应对突发公共卫生事件的逻辑分析——以新冠肺炎疫情为例
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 6;9(7):857. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070857.