Huang Yuru, Burgoine Thomas, White Christine M, Keeble Matthew, Bishop Tom R P, Hammond David, Adams Jean
MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Human Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Nutr J. 2025 Apr 10;24(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12937-025-01119-3.
Governments worldwide have implemented various interventions to improve the healthiness of food offered by out-of-home outlets. However, there is limited evidence on whether healthier menus would influence individual dietary behaviours and quality. In this cross-sectional study, we investigated associations between different measures of the neighbourhood out-of-home food environment, incorporating menu healthiness, and out-of-home meal purchasing and diet quality.
We used a sample of 3,481 adults in Great Britain (GB) with valid home postcodes from the 2021 International Food Policy Study. We linked this sample to a national database of food outlet geographical locations to characterise individuals' exposure to the out-of-home food environment. The exposure metrics included menu healthiness scores, availability, proximity, and relative composition of out-of-home food outlets in various neighbourhood buffers around the home (i.e., 500 - 1600 m). Outcomes considered were out-of-home meal consumption and overall diet quality. Using multiverse analyses, where multiple reasonable analytical choices can be tested, we investigated the associations between different exposure measures and these outcomes.
GB adults had access to an average of 97 (95% CI 91, 104) out-of-home food outlets within 1600 m of their homes. The number of both healthier and less healthy out-of-home food outlets was positively associated with the number of meals purchased out-of-home across all neighbourhood buffers, e.g., every 10 additional less healthy out-of-home food outlets within 500 m of the home corresponded to a 6% (95% CI = 2, 11) increase in the frequency of out-of-home meal purchases in the previous week. Proximity, relative composition, and menu healthiness of neighbourhood out-of-home outlets were not associated with out-of-home meal purchase frequency after adjusting for multiple comparisons. There were no consistent associations between out-of-home food environment exposures and diet quality.
The only aspect of the neighbourhood out-of-home food environment associated with out-of-home meal purchase frequency was the number of out-of-home food outlets. Menu healthiness of out-of-home food outlets was not associated with how often people purchased out-of-home meals or overall diet quality. Interventions focusing on mitigating the proliferation of out-of-home food outlets may be more effective in changing individual dietary behaviour than those focusing on food served.
世界各国政府已实施各种干预措施,以改善户外场所提供食物的健康程度。然而,关于更健康的菜单是否会影响个人饮食行为和质量的证据有限。在这项横断面研究中,我们调查了邻里户外食物环境的不同衡量指标(包括菜单健康程度)与户外就餐购买行为和饮食质量之间的关联。
我们使用了来自2021年国际粮食政策研究的3481名英国成年人样本,其家庭邮政编码有效。我们将该样本与一个全国性的食品场所地理位置数据库相链接,以描述个人接触户外食物环境的情况。接触指标包括菜单健康得分、可及性、距离以及家庭周围不同邻里缓冲区(即500 - 1600米)内户外食物场所的相对构成。所考虑的结果是户外就餐消费和整体饮食质量。我们使用多宇宙分析(可以测试多种合理的分析选择)来研究不同接触指标与这些结果之间的关联。
英国成年人在其家1600米范围内平均可及97家(95%置信区间91, 104)户外食物场所。在所有邻里缓冲区内,更健康和不太健康的户外食物场所数量均与户外就餐购买次数呈正相关,例如,家500米范围内每增加10家不太健康的户外食物场所,前一周户外就餐购买频率就相应增加6%(95%置信区间 = 2, )。在调整多重比较后,邻里户外场所的距离、相对构成和菜单健康程度与户外就餐购买频率无关。户外食物环境接触与饮食质量之间没有一致的关联。
邻里户外食物环境中与户外就餐购买频率相关的唯一方面是户外食物场所的数量。户外食物场所的菜单健康程度与人们户外就餐的频率或整体饮食质量无关。专注于减少户外食物场所扩散的干预措施可能比专注于所提供食物的干预措施在改变个人饮食行为方面更有效。