Farghadani Maryam, Mozafari Safura, Riahinejad Maryam, Haghighi Mashid, Samani Reza Eshraghi, Taravati Amir Mohammad, Rostami Koushan, Shahrokh Seyedeh Ghazal, Sadeghian Arezoo
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Hezar Jerib Ave, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Adv Biomed Res. 2025 Jan 30;14:6. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_283_24. eCollection 2025.
Diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) is a new imaging tool for the diagnosis of breast lesions. This study aims to compare DWIBS with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) sequences.
Eighty consecutive patients underwent both CE-MRI and DWIBS images. DWIBS was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively using the apparent diffusion coefficient mapping. A threshold of 1.44 × 10 mm/s was considered as a cutoff value between malignant and benign lesions. CE-MRI images were evaluated based on a combination of kinetic and morphological information and reported using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon. Statistical analysis was performed for both sequences based on pathologic findings as a gold standard.
Fifty-five out of 80 lesions (69%) were benign, and 25 malignant lesions (31%) have been reported. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for CE-MRI were 100, 38, 42, and 100%, respectively, and those for DWIBS were 77, 70, 53, and 87%, respectively. By comparing DWIBS and CE-MRI data, no statistically significant difference was reported.
DWIBS can be used as an effective alternative for breast CE-MRI in cases of contradictions of IV contrast injection.
背景体部信号抑制扩散加权成像(DWIBS)是一种用于诊断乳腺病变的新型成像工具。本研究旨在比较DWIBS与对比增强磁共振成像(CE-MRI)序列。
连续80例患者接受了CE-MRI和DWIBS检查。使用表观扩散系数图对DWIBS进行定性和定量评估。将1.44×10⁻³mm²/s的阈值视为恶性和良性病变之间的临界值。基于动力学和形态学信息的组合对CE-MRI图像进行评估,并使用乳腺影像报告和数据系统词典进行报告。以病理结果作为金标准对两种序列进行统计分析。
80个病变中有55个(69%)为良性,报告了25个恶性病变(31%)。CE-MRI的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100%、38%、42%和100%,DWIBS的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为77%、70%、53%和87%。比较DWIBS和CE-MRI数据,未报告有统计学显著差异。
在静脉注射造影剂存在矛盾的情况下,DWIBS可作为乳腺CE-MRI的有效替代方法。