Zhang Jianfei, Wang Wanqi, Peng Yanmin
College of Computer and Control Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, Heilongjiang, China.
School of Medical Imaging and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300204, China.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 2;138:111358. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111358. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
Bipolar disorder subtypes (BIP-I and BIP-II) differ in clinical presentation and genetic basis, yet their patterns of genetic association with educational attainment (EA) remain poorly understood. This study investigated the genetic overlap between BIP subtypes and EA, along with their underlying molecular mechanisms.
Using genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for BIP-I (n = 25,060), BIP-II (n = 6781), and EA (n = 765,283), we estimated genetic overlap using bivariate causal mixed models (MiXeR) and identified shared gene loci through the joint false discovery rate (conjFDR) method.
MiXeR analysis revealed approximately 7.4 K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) shared between BIP-I and EA, accounting for 97.4 % of SNPs influencing BIP-I and 56.5 % of those affecting EA. ConjFDR identified 264 loci commonly associated with BIP-I and EA, including 168 novel loci for both traits. Among the 312 lead SNPs at these loci, 219 exhibited consistent effects, while 93 demonstrated opposing effects. In contrast, only two loci were co-associated between BIP-II and EA. Functional annotation and enrichment analyses showed that most loci shared by BIP-I and EA were located in intronic and intergenic regions, with associated genes enriched in processes such as protein binding and nervous system development.
This study highlights the distinct degrees and patterns of genetic association between BIP subtypes and EA, offering insights into the heterogeneity of BIP and a potential genetic basis for clinical subtyping and personalized treatment strategies.
双相情感障碍亚型(双相I型和双相II型)在临床表现和遗传基础上存在差异,但其与教育程度(EA)的遗传关联模式仍知之甚少。本研究调查了双相情感障碍亚型与教育程度之间的遗传重叠及其潜在的分子机制。
利用双相I型(n = 25,060)、双相II型(n = 6781)和教育程度(n = 765,283)的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据,我们使用双变量因果混合模型(MiXeR)估计遗传重叠,并通过联合错误发现率(conjFDR)方法识别共享基因座。
MiXeR分析显示,双相I型和教育程度之间共有约7400个单核苷酸多态性(SNP),占影响双相I型的SNP的97.4%,以及影响教育程度的SNP的56.5%。ConjFDR识别出264个与双相I型和教育程度共同相关的基因座,包括168个两种性状的新基因座。在这些基因座的312个主要SNP中,219个表现出一致的效应,而93个表现出相反的效应。相比之下,双相II型和教育程度之间仅有两个基因座共同相关。功能注释和富集分析表明,双相I型和教育程度共享的大多数基因座位于内含子和基因间区域,相关基因富集于蛋白质结合和神经系统发育等过程。
本研究突出了双相情感障碍亚型与教育程度之间不同程度和模式的遗传关联,为双相情感障碍的异质性以及临床亚型分类和个性化治疗策略提供了潜在的遗传基础。