• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction.

作者信息

Hart J, Berndt R S, Caramazza A

出版信息

Nature. 1985;316(6027):439-40. doi: 10.1038/316439a0.

DOI:10.1038/316439a0
PMID:4022134
Abstract

Studies aimed at characterizing the operation of cognitive functions in normal individuals have examined data from patients with focal cerebral insult. These studies assume that brain damage impairs functions of the cognitive processes along lines that honour the 'normal' pre-morbid organization of the cognitive system. For example, detailed study of individual brain-damaged patients has revealed apparently selective disruption of cognitive functions such as auditory/verbal working memory, phonological processing ability, grapheme-to-phoneme translation procedures and semantic processing. Warrington et al. have studied patients with even more fine-grained selective disturbances of the semantic system. The most selective deficits have been reported for four patients who were significantly better at identifying inanimate objects than they were at identifying living things and foods. These patterns of selective deficit after localized brain damage provide important information about the normal organization of the lexicon, and ultimately about how components of the lexical system are related to particular neural substrates. Here, we report a case study of a patient demonstrating a very selective disturbance of the ability to name items from two related semantic categories. Despite normal performance on a large battery of lexical/semantic tasks, the patient shows a consistent and striking disability in naming members of the semantic categories of 'fruits' and 'vegetables'. The selectivity of this deficit supports a category-specific organization of the mental lexicon, and suggests independence of the processing routes involving naming and name recognition.

摘要

相似文献

1
Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction.
Nature. 1985;316(6027):439-40. doi: 10.1038/316439a0.
2
Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain.大脑中名词和动词的词汇组织
Nature. 1991 Feb 28;349(6312):788-90. doi: 10.1038/349788a0.
3
Category specific dysnomia after thalamic infarction: a case-control study.丘脑梗死术后特定类别命名障碍:一项病例对照研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(9):1385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.12.001. Epub 2005 Feb 5.
4
Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying reading and naming: evidence from letter-by-letter reading and optic aphasia.阅读与命名背后的认知和神经机制:来自逐字母阅读和视觉性失语症的证据。
Neurocase. 2005 Oct;11(5):325-37. doi: 10.1080/13554790591006320.
5
Lexical-semantic deficits in two patients with dominant thalamic infarction.两名优势丘脑梗死患者的词汇语义缺陷
Neuropsychologia. 1997 Feb;35(2):211-9. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00069-3.
6
Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits.为什么动词像无生命的物体?语法范畴和语义范畴缺陷。
Brain Lang. 2000 May;72(3):246-309. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2292.
7
Distinct loci of lexical and semantic access deficits in aphasia: Evidence from voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping and diffusion tensor imaging.失语症中词汇和语义通达缺陷的不同位点:基于体素的病变-症状映射和扩散张量成像的证据。
Cortex. 2015 Jun;67:37-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
8
Semantic control and modality: an input processing deficit in aphasia leading to deregulated semantic cognition in a single modality.语义控制与模态:失语症中的输入加工缺陷导致单一模态下的语义认知失调。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Aug;51(10):1998-2015. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.030. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
9
Lexical-semantic deficits in processing food and non-food items.处理食物和非食物物品时的词汇语义缺陷。
Brain Cogn. 2016 Dec;110:120-130. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
10
Posterior cerebral artery infarcts and semantic category dissociations: a study of 28 patients.大脑后动脉梗死与语义类别分离:28例患者的研究
Brain. 2009 Apr;132(Pt 4):965-81. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp013. Epub 2009 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Basque-Spanish Bilingual Aphasia: A Case-Study to Reveal Frequency-Based, Language-Agnostic Lexical Organization in Bilinguals.巴斯克语-西班牙语双语失语症:一项揭示双语者基于频率、与语言无关的词汇组织的案例研究。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2025 Jun 23;6. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00170. eCollection 2025.
2
Automatic engagement of limbic and prefrontal networks in response to food images reflects distinct information about food hedonics and inhibitory control.边缘系统和前额叶网络对食物图像的自动参与反映了关于食物享乐主义和抑制控制的不同信息。
Commun Biol. 2025 Feb 20;8(1):270. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07704-w.
3
Task-based activation and resting-state connectivity predict individual differences in semantic capacity for complex semantic knowledge.
基于任务的激活和静息状态连接可预测复杂语义知识的语义容量的个体差异。
Commun Biol. 2023 Oct 9;6(1):1020. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05400-1.
4
No fruits without color: Cross-modal priming and EEG reveal different roles for different features across semantic categories.无颜色,不成果:跨模态启动和 EEG 揭示跨语义类别不同特征的不同作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0234219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234219. eCollection 2021.
5
The spatiotemporal neural dynamics underlying perceived similarity for real-world objects.现实物体感知相似性的时空神经动力学。
Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 1;194:12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.031. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
6
This shoe, that tiger: Semantic properties reflecting manual affordances of the referent modulate demonstrative use.这只鞋,那只老虎:反映所指对象手动可及性的语义属性调节指示词的使用。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 7;14(1):e0210333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210333. eCollection 2019.
7
Methodological issues and controversies in research on cognitive disorders.认知障碍研究中的方法学问题与争议
Dement Neuropsychol. 2010 Oct-Dec;4(4):268-276. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642010DN40400004.
8
Brain activation of semantic category-based grouping in multiple identity tracking task.多身份追踪任务中基于语义类别的分组的脑激活情况
PLoS One. 2017 May 15;12(5):e0177709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177709. eCollection 2017.
9
We are what we eat: How food is represented in our mind/brain.我们吃什么,我们就是什么:食物在我们脑海/大脑中的呈现方式。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):1043-54. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0908-2.
10
Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond.关于概念本质的争论:符号、具身化及其他。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):941-58. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1045-2.